Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2005, 09:45 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ca.
Posts: 332

Classifieds Rating: (0)
best inj. constant vs flow for ve tables

I just fired up the 730 swap...and that damn surging idle is gone!!!!
OK, now I'm deciding on the best inj. constant to use before I start in on the ve tables. I know a lot of folk here prefer to not fudge a lot on the inj. constant to try to get the ve tables close; but rather put in the actual flow rating and then adjust the ves as much as they may need it.
I'd like to use the "actual flow" method (advantages??/comments??).
I'm using accell 30lbers (rated at 43.5psi) and started with inj. constant of 30.8 but it was way fat....so went to 38lb constant and still had to lean the idle out by 15%! (oh yea-my press is 42 with vac and 46 without.)
So would it be better to go back to 30.8 and just have to really lean out the 40kpa ranges????
It just seems like a lot of leaning of the ve table to use the actual inj. rating.....
I'd really appreciate some input before I get too far......
Thanks!
__________________
86 383 roller, superam, super charged, self tuned prom, always need tires.
drive it is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 10:02 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,692
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
Well, first off, to set the pressure right at 43.5, do it without vacuum on the regulator.

Second, a cam larger than stock will require less VE than stock at low RPMs, higher than stock at high RPMs. The bigger (lopeyer sounding at least) cams will require the least idle VE in general.

For best results (as long as you don't hit code limitations), just use the actual calculated flow of the injectors and engine displacement. This way you can change injectors in the future or pressure, and just use math to get it back to decent (though low PW's will haunt you when changing injectors).
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2005, 01:17 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ca.
Posts: 332

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by RednGold86Z
Well, first off, to set the pressure right at 43.5, do it without vacuum on the regulator.

Second, a cam larger than stock will require less VE than stock at low RPMs, higher than stock at high RPMs. The bigger (lopeyer sounding at least) cams will require the least idle VE in general.

For best results (as long as you don't hit code limitations), just use the actual calculated flow of the injectors and engine displacement. This way you can change injectors in the future or pressure, and just use math to get it back to decent (though low PW's will haunt you when changing injectors).
OK, I'll go with the actual rated flow for inj. constant-it just was really taking me off guard as to how much I'm having to decrease the idle area ves!!!! And it's a pretty conservative cam...228/222 at 50 with 114lsa.
Thanks!
drive it is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2005, 03:12 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: best inj. constant vs flow for ve tables

Quote:
Originally posted by drive it

I'd like to use the "actual flow" method (advantages??/comments??).
Use the injector flow rate, and set the fuel pressure to the recommended PSI.

The adjust the tables as necessary.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 12:44 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ca.
Posts: 332

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Re: best inj. constant vs flow for ve tables

Quote:
Originally posted by Grumpy
Use the injector flow rate, and set the fuel pressure to the recommended PSI.

The adjust the tables as necessary.
It sounds like if you input the inj flow rate, with a modded engine, then usually the lower ve table will need to be reduced and the upper ve table increased yes???

With actual inj. value I'm finding the whole ve table is wayyy rich;hmmm; possibly these inj were mislabeled as 30lbers and are actually 36lbs....using 36 inj constant seems to end up with ve tables as above.....
drive it is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 12:24 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,616
Car: 91 Red Sled
Engine: 01' LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to JPrevost
To know if you're close with the injector constant and the VE just log a wideband with your open loop AFRs. I also use the old "VE shouldn't be more than x%" rule and when it approaches 95% on a n/a <400hp sbc I go back and increase the injector size and do a shift on the ve tables. That tends to work out well when you don't know for sure what size the injectors are. I know with TBI you just adjust the bpc until you don't see any 95+ ve, that's how I've been doing it.
JPrevost is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 07:40 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ca.
Posts: 332

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by JPrevost
To know if you're close with the injector constant and the VE just log a wideband with your open loop AFRs. I also use the old "VE shouldn't be more than x%" rule and when it approaches 95% on a n/a <400hp sbc I go back and increase the injector size and do a shift on the ve tables. That tends to work out well when you don't know for sure what size the injectors are. I know with TBI you just adjust the bpc until you don't see any 95+ ve, that's how I've been doing it.
So basically you disable closed loop and then adjust the inj constant so that the wide band shows its close to 14.7:1, yes???

Which brings me to another related question-if you dial in the ve tables, and then find that open loop is too rich so then adjust open loop-will that then effect the closed loop ve tables and vice versa.....

Thanks for all the info, I'll keep absorbing....
__________________
86 383 roller, superam, super charged, self tuned prom, always need tires.
drive it is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 07:59 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 2,933
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 3.8K stall 3 diskLU
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break

Classifieds Rating: (0)
One thing I can relate to this is using the correct fuel pressure and injector constant as a starting point.
If you fudge it and boost the fuel pressure, anytime you need limp mode you risk flooding. I don't know if the limp settings in the resistors will account for anything but "stock" sized injectors so with the 30's the risk may still be there.
I've fouled my plugs too many times because of this and am going to go back this year and start from scratch.
good luck!
JP86SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 07:59 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
383, point, starting, table, tbi, ve
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details