Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2005, 02:16 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
NETRES part #???

Any one have a valid GM part # for the NETRES chip.
I run the 7747 and have searched by the number off the chip, the chip numbers listed on Ludis' site and the GMECM site.
I have not been able to get any of the number to cross on the partsdirect or other parts sites.

There's lots of V6 chips in the JY but the V8 7747's are getting a little scarce.

Anyone work at a GM dealership that can tap some resources??

Thanks.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
Bill
USN-1
77 Innocenti (mini) 1275cc 7747 TBI/DIS
75 scout XLC 345/727/JP-D300/3.73's/33's/SOA/EFI
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 03-24-2005, 01:57 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
anyone?
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 02:11 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,206
Engine: 355ci DIY twin T3 60 trim

Classifieds Rating: (1)
What you wrote doesn't make sense. Clearly state your question.
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 03:33 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
OK, I'll try it again.

There are 2 removeable chips under the cover in the 1227747 ECM.
1 contains the bin file and is a 2732 chip.

The other one is the NETRES chip or limp home chip.
There are 2 of them that I know of. 1 for the V6 and 1 for V8's.

I am looking for the GM part number for the V8 chip.
So I can go online or to any GM dealer and give them the number and they can look it up and order it.

Right now the number on the top of my chip is 16060837.

DIY-EFI list this...54995 Custom limp home fuel controller chip

And Ludis list this....CALPAK IDs: “Z”: 16051637
Which I think is the number for the V6 chip.

I know of several people that have picked up V6 7747 ECM's and just swapped the chips for the V8. The chip was only about $14.
But I can not locate the part number now!!

HTH to clearify

Thanks

Last edited by Bill usn-1; 03-25-2005 at 03:35 AM.
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 09:17 AM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 8,688
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I can't help with the part number. However, you may be able to use the term CALPAK and an app such as a '90 full size van with a 305 or 350 in it (IIRC vin K).

The other thing is that the V6 CALPAK will work on an 8 cylinder application. There isn't any cylinder select function to worry about. The V6 CALPAK will provide slightly larger PW's then the V8 CALPAK while in limp mode. There is a write up someplace that describes the function of the various resistors. These would need to be modified anytime the stock injectors or fuel pressure is changed.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 12:38 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks RBob.
I and others I know have ran into misfires and poor running when trying to use the V6 chip.
So to avoid problems I always use the V8 chip.
Are there any base line parameters that are used from the Calpak in any of the normal operations?
How about start up?

Can you completely remove the calpak on the 7747 and not affect the operation?

I never thought it made a difference which one you used till guys using the V6 ecm on thier V8 (with a new BIN)were having a hard time getting it to run right until they changed it out.
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 01:23 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 8,688
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Removing the CALPAK will cause an eror code to be thrown and a solid SES. Don't know how it affects ECM operation.

Now I'm curious about running a V6 calpak on an 8 and having problems. I'm need to review my notes on these things and maybe even try a V6 calpak on a live engine. I can't see it being a difficult issue to correct.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 03:48 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
A couple years ago I swapped one out myself on a motor I had a good tune on.
I didn't see any difference.
But then I had a guy I was helping via email and he couldn't get it to stop loading up. He swapped out the V6 calpak and it ran fine????

Since then I just always use the V8 calpak.

Not knowing code, I'm dependent on guys like you.

Thanks for anything you can provide to clearify.
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 09:49 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: PA
Posts: 921

Classifieds Rating: (1)
16060836 is the one.

16060837 is the number of the chip without the plastic carrier and IIRC its a GM internal number.
Brent is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 12:06 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks,
That did it!!!

Item Number List Core Price Price
16060836 $21.07 $0.00 $15.80
Electrical - Ignition system - Module - Calpak
Stamped 16060837 1988 - 1991
Add to Cart Contact Us
16060836 $21.07 $0.00 $15.80
Electrical - Ignition system - Module - Calpak
Stamped 16060837 1992 - 1993
Add to Cart Contact Us
16060836 $21.07 $0.00 $15.80
Electrical - Ignition system - Module - Calpak
Calpak 1992 - 1995

And it works for the 16051637/6

The best prices I found were on http://www.gmpartsdirect.com/

Last edited by Bill usn-1; 03-26-2005 at 01:13 PM.
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 04:40 PM   #11
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 8,688
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by Bill usn-1
A couple years ago I swapped one out myself on a motor I had a good tune on.
I didn't see any difference.
But then I had a guy I was helping via email and he couldn't get it to stop loading up. He swapped out the V6 calpak and it ran fine????

Since then I just always use the V8 calpak.

Not knowing code, I'm dependent on guys like you.

Thanks for anything you can provide to clearify.
I wonder if the other folks were in limp mode. In that case, yes, they would load up the engine. In reviewing my notes there is pin 9 that is very much different between the two. On a V8 it is open, on a V6 it is 4.6K to ground.

That calpak pin (9) goes to the RFD which also has a cap to ground and a pullup to ignition switched 12 volts (according to the schematics). In my notes I have a question mark as to what it is for. If it does make a major change then cutting pin 9 on the V6 calpak takes care of it.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 06:51 AM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Al Udeid, Qatar-Worldwide service
Posts: 160
Car: IH Scout
Engine: 345 V8 TBI
Transmission: 727

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Since I wasn't there I can't verify if they were.
From their description it sounded like they weren't in limp-home?

Do you know if there are any other values that are different between the 2 calpaks?
cutting pin 9 would be a good test for a bench.

I think I have a V6 calpak so as soon as my truck arrives over here, I will do a little experimenting.

Thanks for the research RBob.

And the PN Brent.
Bill usn-1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 08:43 AM   #13
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 8,688
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by Bill usn-1
Do you know if there are any other values that are different between the 2 calpaks?
cutting pin 9 would be a good test for a bench.
The mux select, rfd enable, and calpak present resistors are the same. The 9 RFD programming resistors are different. If the engine is stock, the injectors are stock, then using a V8 calpak is the best bet. Once anything changes then it doesn't matter. This is because the calpak calibration no longer matches the stock engine. It is interesting that GM used the same calpak for the 305, 350, and 454 engines in vans, f-body's, and Caprices.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
16051637, 16060837, 345, calpak, camaro, chip, codes, engine, gm, home, limp, netres, poor, resistor, running, scout, v6, v8
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.