Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-29-2005, 01:34 PM   #1
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
165 ECM, $32B vs #6E, TunerPro 4 and MAF tables

PLEASE, don't make me do another search, I have searched for the past two days and I really cannot decifer where to start. If you insist on forcing me to "search", give me some search words that will point me in the right direction.

I have read TRAXIONS article, several times, I have programmed before, but I was using TuerCat and a PocketProgrammer.

I have also read the "Not so 'Black magic'..." article several times and I finally realize that is for the SD system, so the info is different for MAF. I found some good info on the $32B and tuning a little with that, but again it was for TunerCat and I am having difficulty translating some of the table names for applicability in TunerPro.

With that said, I recently purchased an AutoProm because my PP would not work with Win XP without paying $20 for upgraded software. (So I spent 10times more on the AutoProm because I could do everything in one package).

THE ROOT OF THIS THREAD:

I have a stable and very drivable modified ARAP BIN I have been running on a mildly modified 305 for a few years. Yet I notice my BLM is at 108 under some conditions.
What table(s) do I adjust to start with?
Since I want to lean out the engine do I increase the values or decrease them?

In the articles I have also found several things...
1) There are many ways to achieve the same results, but through different means (But I think that was for SD) Is that also true for MAF?
2) Someone else preferrs to force the car into Open loop to adjust peramiters to set the BLM to +/-4 128. Should I raise my Closed Loop temp up to 220°F so I am not in Closed loop to adjust my MAF, or is that something you want to do only with SD and your ability to adjust PW (pulse width)? (I guess yes)

IN SHORT:
To adjust my 165 $6E ARAP BIN in TunerPro 4, which tables should I concentrate on for getting my Baseline to 128? If I had to guess its "Maximum AirFlow vs RPM." Am I on track or not?

Thanks.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
87 FORMULA - 5.1 LB9/A4 T-tops 3.73 Modified (Yellow/Black)
87 FORMULA - 5.0 LB9/M5 T-tops 3.45 (Yellow/Gray)
89 FORMULA 350 - CONVERTIBLE 3.27 All original (Red/Gray)
www.3rdgenformula.com
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-29-2005, 01:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Once you open TC, you'll see *Mas Air Flow* 1-5.

Within each of those selections, you'll see counts vs Airflow.

Airflow will be expressed in gms/sec, and that's what you can edit.

So if at an airflow of 60 grms/sec your a little lean, you'd look until you found 60 gm/sec, which would be table 3. Then when you see 59. 1 @ 864, you'd want to raise that, a a few grms/sec, and the adjacent entries a couple. The take a test drive, to see if you went to far or not enough. Keep repeating this until you get the BLs you want.

The MAF systems, IMO, are best run in closed loop. That allows the ecm to help fill in for slightly different ariflows at different RPMs. The MAPs allow for that in the way the tables are designed.

The best way to get going is to get a noteboook, and start making small changes, and noting what happens. After a while it will become rather intutive, but getting it *down* initially is a PITB.
Grumpy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 02:11 PM   #3
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Grumpy, thanks for the reply, Although I want to be clear on this:
I figure were talking about the tables, but there is 6 tables on mine, I have MAF table #1 thru #6. The relationship is Volts in one column, and Grams/sec. Grams/Sec is adjustable, is that the same thing as your referring to? (I found 59.01 so I am thinking so, but my volts is 2.47 for 59.01, thats no where close to 864)

864 or any number clse to it makes no sence to my information, so I am thinking it must be a calculation or a conversion... Or I am really lost...

THanks again.

John

Last edited by okfoz; 06-29-2005 at 02:17 PM.
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 03:11 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 6,475
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to 3.8TransAM Send a message via Yahoo to 3.8TransAM
Yes,

The gram/sec is what u want to raise or lower correspondingly to whether you are rich or lean.

U said u were at 108 at a few points.

Basically u need to find the corresponding airflow(gm/sec) and then raise it slightly and then repeat your testing until u get that 124-128 range and you should be good from there.

later
Jeremy
3.8TransAM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 03:37 PM   #5
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
thanks thats EXACTLY what I needed
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 05:35 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 8,688
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Lower the gms/sec vs volts with the BLM below 128. Lower airflow, less fuel added.

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 05:41 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 6,475
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to 3.8TransAM Send a message via Yahoo to 3.8TransAM
lol

How the heck did I let that one slip in?

Yes Rbob is right.

Lowering it will decrease fuel and raising it will increase fuel.

sorry for the mistake/typo

jeremy
3.8TransAM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 08:14 AM   #8
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
WHAT THE HECK!!!



You mean I would have been making my car more rich, scratchimg my head and not understanding what I did wrong...

John
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 08:41 AM   #9
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 6,475
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to 3.8TransAM Send a message via Yahoo to 3.8TransAM
I am always happy to help confuse someone, the more the merrier:-)

Actually havent done a ton of MAF stuff other than playing with a friends 89 GTA and my TTA(not MAF anymore).

U should also try searching under MAF tables and scalar(s) as we well.

Should net you more info

later
Jeremy
3.8TransAM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 03:37 PM   #10
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 8,600
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: Yet another 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Also make sure the end value in each table matches the starting value in the next table. These are teh points at which the tables are stitched together. Another helpful thing is to do a least squares curve fit using the governing equation for an air meter between known values to smooth the table. This can be a bit tricky so you can just carefully eyeball it. One thing you dont want is sudden changes from one cell to the next. This will cause the engine to do strange things like buck and surge when it crosses between each cell.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 04:05 PM   #11
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
I will keep that in mind, and thanks for the cross-table info. If I remember the tables right I did notice that there was some repeted values from one to the next.

John
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 01:18 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 87
Car: 86 Corvette
Engine: 350 vortec lt4 intake hotcam

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It doesn't take much to change it so go just a little at a time. Also I had low blms at idle and lowering the values didn't help. Then I discovered A lean misfire leaves unburned fuel in the exhaust and the o2 sensor sees it as a rich condition. And make sure all ignition parts are good before you start changing fuel values or you will be going in circles like I did. A bad coil ground and I burned about a twenty chips before I found it and had to start over.
Larry is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.