Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2005, 06:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,150

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Effects of the running the wrong knock sensor?

I was checking the voltages again...

I found out that I'm only getting about 2.5V DC (.04V AC @2000rpm) at circuit GF9- the knock sensor wire.

The AC Delco Port Fuel injection manual says I should see 9.2V DC (.08V AC @2000 rpm ±100rpm).

Before I run out and buy another knock sensor, what would this cause?

Thanks...
__________________
ZZ4, MiniRam EFI manifold, AFR heads



See me in Chevy High Performance and Camaro Performers
ULTM8Z Website
Handy DIY tuning tools and factory BINs
ULTM8Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 10:47 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,391
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
The AC Delco Port Fuel injection manual is incorrect. The DC voltage you read is correct.

This is based on my memory of your setup being SD with a '7730 ECM. . . Correct?

RBob.
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 12:07 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,150

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah, it's a 7730...

Shoot!!

I thought I had found the smoking gun!!

Back to the drawing board...


EDIT: what about the AC voltage?
__________________
ZZ4, MiniRam EFI manifold, AFR heads



See me in Chevy High Performance and Camaro Performers
ULTM8Z Website
Handy DIY tuning tools and factory BINs
ULTM8Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2005, 09:45 PM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NJ/PA
Posts: 1,006
Car: Yes
Engine: Many
Transmission: Quite a few

Classifieds Rating: (0)
the AC signal is very dynamic and hard to measure without an oscilloscope. basically, the sensor will resonate at a specfic band of frequencies when you tap on it. it would look like a burst of voltage of short duration, whenever you tapped on it, and can vary quite a bit. I think i remember seeing that it can get up over 10 volts when you rap it really good.
jwscab is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 04:49 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
91L98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,142
Car: Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I've been following the 'saga' for a while now, and haven't had much advice to give, but i can imagine that this must be very frustrating.

I have one thought:

Have you thought about grabbing a bone stock, TPI intake setup? lower, runners, plenum, TB, fuel rails, the whole deal. They can be bought or pieced together fairly affordably, and then re-sold when testing is done. Bolt the whole thing on and see how it runs. Maybe you could even find someone to loan one to you.

Since there have been questions about miniram airflow distribution, and it was posted a while back that on LT1 cars (again a short runner intake), that #2 had to be run the richest, and #2 is the one you're having problems with...maybe your particular cam profile is causing some kind of wave/reversion/something in the #2 runner. who knows. but since the miniram is apparently the only common thread, methinks it's time to try another intake setup.

and if THAT did not solve it, I think I'd pull the motor and inspect the ring package on #2 VERY carefully (end gap, thickness, etc.) I would think that there are ring problems that could pass a static leakdown test just fine. For example, on my '71 406, when total seal sent me 1/16" top rings for a 5/64 ringland piston, it was NOT caught during assembly. Compression tested great, but blew blue smoke everywhere. Put in a set of sealed power moly rings of the correct size..problem solved.
__________________
1991 Z28
L98/G80/G92/J65
LT1 injectors, DIY PROM, t-56, AS&M siamese runners, accel intake, F1 GS-D3's
* 14.46 @ 93.36mph, 1.98 60' 7/5/02 (stock)
* 14.89 @ 96.76mph, 2.51 60' 7/7/04 (T56, AS&M SS runners, accel intake)
...guess I need to work on that rear suspension!
1971 RS
406/4spd...a work in progress..
in the 13's @ 107mph without a posi, it's a start.

Last edited by 91L98Z28; 07-03-2005 at 04:54 PM.
91L98Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 09:11 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,150

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 91L98Z28
I've been following the 'saga' for a while now, and haven't had much advice to give, but i can imagine that this must be very frustrating.
Whatever it turns out to be, I just know it's going to be something so stupid, I'll have to leave this board in shame!


Quote:
Originally posted by 91L98Z28


I have one thought:

Have you thought about grabbing a bone stock, TPI intake setup? lower, runners, plenum, TB, fuel rails, the whole deal. They can be bought or pieced together fairly affordably, and then re-sold when testing is done. Bolt the whole thing on and see how it runs. Maybe you could even find someone to loan one to you.

Since there have been questions about miniram airflow distribution, and it was posted a while back that on LT1 cars (again a short runner intake), that #2 had to be run the richest, and #2 is the one you're having problems with...maybe your particular cam profile is causing some kind of wave/reversion/something in the #2 runner. who knows. but since the miniram is apparently the only common thread, methinks it's time to try another intake setup.

and if THAT did not solve it, I think I'd pull the motor and inspect the ring package on #2 VERY carefully (end gap, thickness, etc.) I would think that there are ring problems that could pass a static leakdown test just fine. For example, on my '71 406, when total seal sent me 1/16" top rings for a 5/64 ringland piston, it was NOT caught during assembly. Compression tested great, but blew blue smoke everywhere. Put in a set of sealed power moly rings of the correct size..problem solved.
Yeah, I've definitely thought about doing that. Trying to locate a loaner manifold is somewhat of a challenge. I have a couple of buddies that I thought would know where to find one, but to no avail.

I tend to lean away from the cam/manifold combination as the problem since the ZZ4 cam I used to have was displaying the same symptoms. Two cams in a row interacting negatively with the Miniram seems like long odds to me.
__________________
ZZ4, MiniRam EFI manifold, AFR heads



See me in Chevy High Performance and Camaro Performers
ULTM8Z Website
Handy DIY tuning tools and factory BINs
ULTM8Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 09:33 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,150

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The resistance on my knock sensor is the following:


3.2 kOhms when I back probe the connector (connector plugged into the ECM).

17.7 kOhms when I probe the connector (connector unplugged from ECM) This is essentially the sensor itself (minus the couple of milliohms from the wire lead, of course)


Aren't the MAP cars supposed to have 3.9kOhms on the sensor itself?

Some search results I found on it...

http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthre...highlight=100k

http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthre...ght=knock+100k

http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthre...ght=knock+100k
ULTM8Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:41 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 2,933
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 3.8K stall 3 diskLU
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I checked mine when I first bought it and it did measure out to 3.89 KOhms. That was the 350 sensor. GM# 10456549 for 92' Camaro.
JP86SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 12:41 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
10456549, 730, 86, chevy, circuit, diy, gen, gm, knock, rear, sensor, shorted, test, testing, wrong
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details