Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2006, 07:38 PM   #51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 584
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kevm14
Wow, that's interesting. I'll let the Impala SS community know, if they care. It's only a 5.6% difference in flow but I do remember people saying they had to adjust the offset tables to get it just right. Unless I missed something, 39psi was "common knowledge." You know how "common knowledge" can be...
kevm14 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 08:02 PM   #52
TGO Supporter/Moderator
 
anesthes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 6,170
Car: '79 Z28
Engine: 400 bored .060 over, forged
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 8.5" 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Quote:
Originally posted by kevm14
Wow, that's interesting. I'll let the Impala SS community know, if they care. It's only a 5.6% difference in flow but I do remember people saying they had to adjust the offset tables to get it just right. Unless I missed something, 39psi was "common knowledge." You know how "common knowledge" can be...
I think it all stems from people assuming the injectors were rated at whatever rail pressure the fords used. I remember some guys on here calling me retarded for saying I think thats false, so finally I sent a set, then another set to be checked. Then some others did the same..

Im not shy around here, and alot of people dislike me for it. But whatever. I always try to do and say what I feel is right.

Here is a link to one of my posts. There were some followups about a year later in another thread, but I can't find it:

http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/show...hreadid=219294

-- Joe

Last edited by anesthes; 02-02-2006 at 08:06 PM.
anesthes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2006, 10:32 PM   #53
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,916
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Did some ECM tuning this weekend to see if it is possible to get this setup to work with new Ford 42#/hr green tops.
355ci
730 ECM w/ $58 BBZB 749 code
216@.050" cam (both I & E), -4* overlap @.050"
LT1 intake, 48mm TB
two T3 .63 A/R corks in the exhaust

Worked with various spark & fuel tables. The most influencial table was the BPW linearity table. Second most was the closed throttle VE table.
Tuning started with a BPW of 1.5ms. That is, two 1.5ms squirts every 720*. WBO2 AFR was about 13.0. The min BPW tables were set at .5 to enter single fire mode. In the end, the BPW was 1.2ms +/- .2ms at 750 rpm. Timing set at 26* w/r/t TDC.
Idle fluctuated about 100 rpm. When the coolant fan kicked on it would cause the stall saver to engage sometimes. Overall, not very good but streetable. Turning the idle to 800-850 rpm helped but sounded like it was too high of an idle. BPW were about 1.3ms. The BPW is VERY sensitive at idle. Changing closed throttle VE by .3 made a huge difference in AFR and idle quality.

In the end, this shows that saturated using double fire batch is a waste of time when big injectors are installed. Sure, it runs decent. But BPW that low even with "linear saturated injectors" are very close to the borderline of not turning on. If they get slightly clogged it throws the fuel WAY off. It is a marginal setup.

I am going to try going using the single fire mode to get the idle BPW up in the 2.0ms range. This is the only way I see it working properly. The issue then becomes the transistion between single fire to batch fire. New tables to mess with I guess.

This all applies to double fire batch mode. SEFI does not apply.
Figured I would post in case anyone is looking to install saturated injectors with double fire ECM.
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 03:54 PM   #54
Senior Member
 
vernw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas, TX area
Posts: 3,205
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by anesthes
I think it all stems from people assuming the injectors were rated at whatever rail pressure the fords used. I remember some guys on here calling me retarded for saying I think thats false, so finally I sent a set, then another set to be checked. Then some others did the same..

Im not shy around here, and alot of people dislike me for it. But whatever. I always try to do and say what I feel is right.

Here is a link to one of my posts. There were some followups about a year later in another thread, but I can't find it:

http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/show...hreadid=219294

-- Joe
Yep, I'm one of those folks who sent some SVO 30's to Rich at CruizinPerformance.com, and he tests them at 43 PSI, not the 39 Fords are supposed rated at. And guess what? Mine all tested between 30 and 31 after being cleaned, etc.

SVO 30's are 30lb/hr at 43.5 PSI, no question.
vernw is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2006, 04:32 PM   #55
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,916
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Is www.cruizinperformance.com still in business? The page comes up as unknown. I have a set of P&H that I want to get cleaned & flowed.

Anyone else out there do a good job at cleaning them?

Thanks,
J
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 08:36 AM   #56
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NJ/PA
Posts: 1,006
Car: Yes
Engine: Many
Transmission: Quite a few

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think your website is wrong.

should be www.cruzinperformance.com

jwscab is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 10:18 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 457

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vernw
Yep, I'm one of those folks who sent some SVO 30's to Rich at CruizinPerformance.com, and he tests them at 43 PSI, not the 39 Fords are supposed rated at. And guess what? Mine all tested between 30 and 31 after being cleaned, etc.

SVO 30's are 30lb/hr at 43.5 PSI, no question.
I recently had a set of 19 lb. SVO's cleaned by Rich. Look at the pic and judge for yourself.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Injector Flow.JPG (64.8 KB, 27 views)
__________________
If it doesn't make it go fast, stop fast, or look cool, its fluff!
HaulnA$$ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 12:21 PM   #58
Supreme Member
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 2,932
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 3.8K stall 3 diskLU
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Mine were the same as Vern's.
43.5 psi gets 30-30.5 lbs/hr across the board on the red tops.
Confirmed again.
JP86SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2006, 12:21 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
22, 58, 60, adder, bigger, bpw, constant, gm, injector, injectors, low, offset, pulse, table, voltage, width
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details