Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2006, 02:57 PM   #1
Member
 
87 Vette Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 180
Car: 1987 Corvette
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: ZF 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
$32B to $6E Questions (in TunerPro RT)

I am in the process of adjusting a $6E bin (APYP) for my '87 vette using TunerPro. Coming from a $32B mask, there are a few parameters listed in TunerPro for $6E that I am not entirely sure of their function or if changes need to be made. I tried using the regular search and advanced search for "$6E", "checksum", etc. but kept getting a "sorry, no matches" message. I am sure this has been discussed at length here, but hopefully someone can help .

1. For the "Mask ID (Set to AA to disable Checksum)" - should I set to "AA" or leave at "6E"? What does disabling the checksum do?

2. What is the "ALDL Spark Adder" parameter?

3. What is the "Trans TPS filter coef."?

4. Should I leave the "Calc BPW (Don't Use Table)" flag checked?

5. What is the "Spark Correction - LV8 vs. Coolant Temp" table for?

6. Is there any other basic information (regarding going from $32B to $6E) I should know? Changes that need to be made?

I've read about the scaler tables and disabling the EGR in the stickies above, so I have an understanding there. Many of the other parameters seem to be fairly intuitive. There is a lot more to work with in $6E, which is a little overwhelming for a novice like myself coming from $32B, but I can already see the benefits of being able to work with these additional parameters.

Thanks very much for your help!
Dan
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
87 Vette Owner is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 04-23-2006, 10:45 PM   #2
TGO Supporter
 
Mangus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,812
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Hello -

1) Set it to AA and forget it.
2) Set the ALDL spark adder to 0. If set to anything else, when the 10k resistor is in place to connect to the ALDL data stream, that number of degrees is added to the spark output. This is generally undesireable, so setting it to zero means your spark output isn't touched during ALDL monitoring/logging.
3) I'm not sure (I drive a manual)
4) Yes. $6E doesn't actually have a table, so this flag isn't very useful. Leave it in the "don't use table" state and use the MAF tables for adjusting fuel. The MAF tables are counter-intuitive at first, but you'll get it with some experimentation (and reading).
5) It adds or removes spark (+ is add, - is remove) from the final spark value at the given load value and the given temperature. So if the base table has, say, 38 degrees entered at 2000 RPM and 160 LV8, and the you're running at 200 degrees F, and the spark correction table has +4 entered in it at 200 degrees and 160 LV8, then the final spark output will be 38 + 4 or 42 degrees. This table allows you to change the spark output to correct for engine efficiency, performance, knock, etc, at varying temperatures.
6) Not really. Almost everything else (including everything above, actually) is very similar if not identical in functionality.

M
Mangus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 05:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,659
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
I've been assuming the Trans TPS Filter coefficient value is for Transient Throttle filter comparisson (Fast filter - minus - slow filter = trans TPS). Filter being %change vs change (if the signal increases by 5 units, and the filter is at 50%, then the filter value will increase by 2.5 units).
If you have 2 filters (one large, one small) on the same signal (one to cancel noise, the other to make a "delta"), a step change in the signal can be used to create a nice hump with decay in the "delta" filter value by just subtracting one from the other.
This hump with decay can then be used as your delta TPS, which is used for acceleration enrichment, which gives a nice peak and decay of fuel.
__________________
-Jeremy- EFI Calibration Engineer, Director of R&D, Software Designer (Fuel Injection Technologies - dianpen.com) - still in China since Nov '04!!!
86 Z28 - rusty, tired, and in storage - 89 GTA with plans, but - also in storage now needs paint - badly, 79 Malibu classic with 91 L98, 4L60, 3.73
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:48 PM   #4
Member
 
87 Vette Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 180
Car: 1987 Corvette
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: ZF 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks Mark - I really appreciate it! The TunerPro RT / AutoProm combination is great!

RednGold86Z - have you made changes to the "Trans TPS filter coef." parameter with noticeable improvements?

Thanks again!
Dan
87 Vette Owner is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 10:48 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Camaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 342
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 2.73 :(

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Camaero Send a message via Yahoo to Camaero
Thanks for the information! I was just coming on hear to ask this very question. I am completely new and have not even burnt one prom yet. Would you guys reccomend sticking with the 32b for now or going to this right away? I hear you have to discon your cold start injector? Would somebody explain?

Thanks!
Camaero is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 01:30 PM   #6
Member
 
87 Vette Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 180
Car: 1987 Corvette
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: ZF 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I am very new myself, but from everything I've read, switching to $6E is the way to go, as it is an improvement over $32B. There are a few more variables to look at (and learn, as you can tell from my post ), but most are self explanatory.

As I understand it, $32B handles cold start enrichment via the extra cold start injector (which I believe is NOT controlled by the PROM). $6E handles cold start enrichment via the 8 regular injectors (there is no 9th inj), and this parameter can be adjusted in the bin.

When switching from $32B to $6E, I've read that some people disconnect the cold start injector, others have left it with no issues. I guess it depends on how the car performs and how the cold start enrichment is set up in $6E.
87 Vette Owner is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
adder, aldl, spark, tunerpro
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.