Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2008, 01:56 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Greetings:

Observation:

WOT at 2000 rpm and 82 gr/sec my stock 350 and my modified 383
both hit the max air flow vs rpm table (89 gr/sec) and ride all the way to 255.

Tried two Bosch and a wells type all read the same.

I would have thought the 350 would have been lower and never hit the max table till 255.

What do you think?


Question:


Does anyone have WOT data log of a stock 305, 350 or modified 383 ?
Needs to have at least rpm, tps and gps.
If the Max air flow vs rpm table has been altered I would like to know that.

If so can you send it to me?

I have datamaster and excel so any of these format's would work (.uni .csv .text .xls .ods)

I want to plot a graph RPM vs Gr/Sec to see what is “normal” vs “modified”. Comparing to Max air flow vs rpm table.

Thanks
pandin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 02:22 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,618
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

max airflow vs rpm table can be moddified to allow the computer to read more air at certain rpms.


a more modified engine will pull in much more air than a stocker, so you need to adjust that table to allow the ecm to read more air at those lower rpms.

a hot 383 will max an air flow sensor at 255gr/s at sometimes 4000-5000 rpms.

I know my HSR bolt on L98 wouldnt go over 205gr/s at 5000 rpms. Table value i'm not sure of at this moment but it is well over that. So the ecm is capable of reading more air and making changes
Orr89RocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2008, 03:46 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

I understand that the table can be changed. am getting prominator for the 383.

The question is at lower gr/sec flows (wot) why would a stock 350 tpi flow enough air to be near the Max air flow vs rpm limit @ 2000 rpm ?

If the max air flow table is reached, then the ecm will limit fuel at that gr/sec.
This will make for lean/rich spots in the factory tune. The view on this board is that a stock 350 will not reach this limiting table. It looked like mine did so I was tring to get some hard data to see if this is so.

I am looking for someone else's data log on a stockish 305 or 350 to compare to.

It has to do with the maf calibration, I think, which would be nice to know when tuning. After reading posts where tuner's have adjusted the lower maf scaler tables for rich/lean and got no change.

I got a bunch of Maf's all read differant at max flow 187 200 205 255.
also they hit this number at differant rpm's.

Maybe someone who is tuning with only one maf would get some insight to the variances with age that maf sensors show.

Thanks for the reply.
pandin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 12:33 PM   #4
doc
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 2,136
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

pandin, I hope you dont mine me posting here.

Is the max air flow VS RPM table "looked" at continually?????

I have been under the impression that it was backup in case the MAF malfunctions.

If it is looked at continually, if the MAF reading is above the value in the max air flow VS RPM table (for a given RPM) does the fueling equation use the value from the table????
doc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 12:50 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,920
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Quote:
Originally Posted by pandin View Post
I understand that the table can be changed. am getting prominator for the 383.

The question is at lower gr/sec flows (wot) why would a stock 350 tpi flow enough air to be near the Max air flow vs rpm limit @ 2000 rpm ?
It is all about volumetric efficiency(VE). 383ci more airflow potential, but probably has a bigger cam. This would make the 350 and 383 flow the same air at 2K RPM. At higher RPMs (3500-7000+), the 383 will outflow the 350 with the proper cam and equiv. intake & exhaust.

Your 2K RPM CFM points being the same is due to VE (cam,heads,intake).
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 07:52 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Greetings Doc and junkcltr glad to have you join my post.

For anyone following this.

Check out RBob under tech boards-DIY prom-Prom tuning Guide book and Faq-Chapter 5 Tuning Articles broken down by ECM-165-Maf Miscellanea-

First Post by RBob:

"This value is then tested against a maximum value. The maximum
is from a lookup based on RPM." (Max Air Flow vs RPM? pandin) "If the calculated value is greater then the max allowed by RPM then the max value by RPM is used as the gms/sec term.

Otherwise the calculated value is used as the gms/sec term."


Also RBob 3rd Post

"10) The gms/sec term is then tested against a
maximum airflow based on RPM. This is from the
table as descibed in a previous post.

-done calculating the gms/sec term-"

He goes on to explain LV8 math.

Thank you RBob for all the knowledge.

If a stock 350 can bump this table then everybody that is using a maf is affected, to some degree, by it. It will shorten the pulse width (lean) when against the table.

Wrong time of year to test this. but was looking for somebody that maybe had a data log saved from the past.

Last edited by pandin; 02-21-2008 at 08:07 PM.
pandin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 01:43 AM   #7
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Shouldnt be bumping your head on that table at the lower RPM's with a stockish 350. I looked at some older log files and I wasnt hitting it with a modded 350 until the 170 gm/s range, so around the 3200+RPM mark. My supercharged 305 was hitting it way before that, I saw some defaults down in the 2300RPM area and that wasn't at WOT.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 10:12 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Thanks madmax

What was the moded 350 gr/sec at 2000 rpm ?

Last edited by pandin; 02-22-2008 at 10:41 AM.
pandin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 10:57 AM   #9
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Mid 70's.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:44 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Max air flow vs rpm $32 $32B $6E

Thanks
pandin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:44 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
32b, 6e, air, airflow, engine, flow, maf, max, maximum, reach, rpm, spreadsheet, table, vs, wont
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details