Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-2008, 02:13 PM   #1
pfk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to pfk Send a message via MSN to pfk Send a message via Yahoo to pfk
Injector Flow Rate vs (Injector Constant vs Vacuum) MAF code

I am making some adjustments to may MAF bin and have a question about the Injector Constant vs Vacuum(VacAFPR) table.

In my SD bin, I purposely fudged the Injector Flow Rate to give me more range with my VE table. Now that I have the VAFPR hooked up, I was going to use the table to put in the actual amounts,obviously it is going to affect my VE table significantly.

so here's the thing

Here's the table with actual values with 90# injectors calculated at 85%DC

0 Kpa 37psi 18.55g/s
10 Kpa 36psi 18.3g/s
20 Kpa 35psi 18.04g/s
30 Kpa 34psi 17.78g/s
40 Kpa 31psi 16.98g/s
50 Kpa 30psi 16.7g/s
60 Kpa 29psi 16.42g/s
70 Kpa 27psi 15.85g/s
80 Kpa 26psi 15.55g/s

In order to keep the VE table usable up to 100Kpa, I had my Flow Rate set at 10g/s (14 was ok but I wanted to leave room for the s/c so I went with more)

What would be the best way to go about this? should I fudge the table to coordinate with the old 10g/s flow rate or should I edit my VE table to match the actual flow rate?

The next question would be is does the MAF code, while running in SD mode due to MAF failure,use the VAPFR table?

Last edited by pfk; 02-25-2008 at 02:22 PM. Reason: accidently submitted before finishing
pfk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 04:18 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Re: Injector Flow Rate vs (Injector Constant vs Vacuum) MAF code

The VAFPR corrections where mainly for high winding NA setups that need lots of pressure to keep the PW down at high RPMs. They can be used with the SC setup, but after the MAP maxes out, the tables will flatline at 0 kPa VAC while the FP will keep rising a few PSI as the boost builds. You can likely just work the corrections into the MAF table at high airflows and it will roughly correct for the VAFPR pressure increase. Worst case will be a few % rich at WOT when the boost raises the pressure. The table is used at all times, even during a MAP failure. The n-alpha MAP will be used to approximate the vacuum.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 08:35 PM   #3
pfk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to pfk Send a message via MSN to pfk Send a message via Yahoo to pfk
Re: Injector Flow Rate vs (Injector Constant vs Vacuum) MAF code

I am back at it again with the VAFPR...

I read through the disassembly several times and got all of my sensor data working like I would like it to, in fact, I have gone back and changed it several times since.

I decided to get a different VAFPR so that I know that it will operate properly (the one I was using was made for lower pressures and adapted)

I started back with the stock LS1 MAF table (it does work well as is) and had a discovery that my 90# injectors were in fact 80# injectors. Then found out that the calculator I was using for the flow rates was using a different conversion factor. Changed it to the norm and corrected the flow table to match, but am still having trouble dialing it in.

I added a display for the Injector Flow Rate value so that I can try and decipher what is going wrong, and to my surprise I saw the display go over the highest point on the table.

I have tunerpro grabbing 2 bytes of info at 0257 and displaying it with a factor of 0.000305. For the most part it is working as it should but then at times it is displaying 19.99 :think:

I tried searching through the source code for any place that uses the info at 0257 and 0258, and all I could come up with was

Code:
;-[Gms/cyl fuel] / injector flowrate
;    
    LDD    0,Y            ;Load two upper bytes of fuel/cyl 
    LDX    L0257            ;Load inj flowrate x 3276.8
    FDIV                ;Upper two bytes of gms fuel/inj. flowrate
    STX    4,Y            ;Save result 
    LDD    2,Y            ;Load in lower two bytes
    LDX    L0257            ;Inj flowrate x 3276.8
    IDIV                ;Lower two bytes / inj. flowrate
    XGDX                ;Get result into D
    ADDD    4,Y            ;Add in previous result
    BCC    LFUEL01            ;Bra if no overflow
;
    LDD    #$FFFF            ;Clear overflow
and

Code:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;-Look up the injector flowrate based on vac
;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;
    LDAA    L01EC            ;Load kPa vac
    LDAB    LINJP01            ;Filter coeff. for vac used in lookup
    LDX    L01E0            ;Stored vac kPa for lookup, filtered
    JSR    LF0F6            ;Filter routine
;
    STD    L01E0            ;Save updated filtered vac kPa
    LDX    #LINJP00        ;Load injector flowrate
    JSR    LD2D00            ;16 bit 2D lookup
;
    STD    L0257            ;Save it, injector flowrate x 3276.8
I do not see anything that would do anything to the values recorded so once again I'm confused.

I just finished remapping my ALDL xmission table again and will be saving another log shortly, if I still have the same result, I will post a small chunk of it to show what it is I'm talking about.
pfk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 01:14 AM   #4
pfk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to pfk Send a message via MSN to pfk Send a message via Yahoo to pfk
Re: Injector Flow Rate vs (Injector Constant vs Vacuum) MAF code

Well I don't know what to say, I guess I must have screwed something up when I made my last changes to the xmission table. After this remap, everything appears to be operating normally.

I ended up removing the vac/boost reference to the vafpr,and doing a run. Everything worked out fine, but I had to change the air flow values again. I was hoping to get the injector flow rate to work so that I could leave the MAF table alone, but couldn't do it. I'll keep going on this bin for a couple of days and maybe start fresh again but at least I have another drivable bin.
pfk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 01:14 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
air, code, constant, diy, flow, fuel, gs, injector, kpa, maf, map, rate, rates, vacuum, vafpr
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details