aiight so im in the middle of the process of tuning my combo and i need a wb02.. will a faster sample rate of the wb02 help in my mpg tuning or what? like i noticed the lc1 is slower than say some others. how will the more sample rate be better as far as accuracy? or is it not something to worry about? i need to decide on a wb02 as its the final thing i need.

I have a LC-1, and running through logworks the sample rate seems instantanious, when I log the WB through the WUB for my ebl, I have to slow down the sample rate as it it way to fast, meaning when I look at a datalog, which is broken down into like 1/12 of a second, the afr isn't steady, ex.

1min 1sec =12.1
1min 1sec =12.8
1min 1sec =12.2
1min 1sec =12.4

etc till it hits the next second, slowing the sample rate down give me a better average representation of the AFR. Just my experiance. Now if you have a WBo2 for each cylinder, then the faster rate would be more beneficial IMO, since you could see variances from cylinder to cylinder.

I heard the LC-1 had a fast sample rate & also more accurate than the other WBO2's...

Be sure to follow the grounding / wiring instructions for best results....

I'll be getting one soon too...

Rafael

aiight so it looks like the lc1 its going to be, thanks.