Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-04-2008, 11:25 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13

Classifieds Rating: (0)
mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

I'm currently trying to get the OD hac by dimented to assemble, and am eccountering the exact same problems as junkcltr (see post 325 and 327 of tbi guys its time to update) with the program being offset and extended adresses being coded as direct adress. Ive run the file through the mini ide under windows and under dos as suggested by dimented but am getting the same results. Dimented has suggested adding a constant byte to correct the problem. I'm not sure what is meant by a constant byte, or how it is to be used, should it be placed in the .asm file or formatted into the mini ide. definatly would apprreciat the help. thanks
BIG 'G' is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 01:37 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,657
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 2.77's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to dimented24x7
Re: mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

Is it just a few of the addresses being different? I remember fixing a few errors in the original code that used the incorrect addressing modes where used in several places.
dimented24x7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 11:18 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: mini IDE assembly problems w/$0D

Actually their are quite a few differences, I found four corrections you made at C322, C338, C754, and C77D where you switched from extended to direct addressing. This was offsetting the bin by a total of 4 lines (or maby bytes) which is what i was seeing when comparing bins in tuner pro. Your refference to the constant byte was throwing me off, thought i was making a mistake when converting it to a bin. Turns out my mistake was not re calcing the check sum which changed due to your corrections. I have fixed the checksum and now have the reassembled bin working . Thanks for your help dimented
BIG 'G' is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 11:18 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details