Ive read where that if your logging your blm to 128, than you would be actually lean on your fueling [ I AM ] --- I use the V.E. fixer most of the time to adjust my fueling after a logging,,, So if above is true can you in the main ? table in your cells, change it from 128 to say 125 and then log and adjust,---Dont have ve fixer here now in front of me, so i hope im clear.

you mean change the numbers to 125 instead of 128 in the table.well anywhere that is not 128 will not be in closed loop anywhere that is will be so no.but you should be able to change the O2 swing voltage to make it richer at 128 I think.plus are you logging with 160 baud aldl or 8192 I dont have a camaro but i do run an delco ecu based V6 car and tune with blm's its an 808 ecu similar to 165 only no 8192 baud uart chip and when logging with 160 baud and the 10k resistor the timing in my bin is restricted to 10 degrees under 2000 revs it took me a while to realise this and it was ruining my blm's due to the timing locked at 10 degrees i was tuning for perfect blm's then when i removed the aldl cable and resistor it would be lean as so i set the diagnostic rpm to 0 and all fixed can log without rich blm's may not be your issue but least it bumped your post if it isnt.silly kiwi from newzealand hehe

Im 160 baud.--Was just curios as what it would do changing VE TABLE [Wide Aver Int Table] to 125,, instead of 128.----Im a little lost as to why you said it would be in open loop ??--Last summer i was lean after logging blm to 128,,I then raised my 02 ,rich/mean/lean tables to get it richer.--Car responded well,, but after driving for ? a day it would loose its power gain i had,from raising the 02 switch.-??? relearning i guess ???? ---Well car will be out shortly and going to install my new 90 lb injectors and start from scratch.