Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2009, 03:04 PM   #1
TGO Supporter
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 5,344

Classifieds Rating: (0)
IAT/CTS Blend Q?

I added IAT control last year. Never tuned it. Used EBL.bin table values. This morning cold environmental temps are 40F. IAT shows 55F in CL . 20 miles later IAT is showing 80F. Now my BLM's are showing 140-155 in some cells others are 130-140. I expected higher BLM since very cool air today.

Should I adjust the IAT/CTS table?

I see 16 grams being 96% so I assume that might be idle scenario and biased to coolant temp for final pulse width. Now at other end gm/sec at 255 shows 70% of coolant so now I assume that is a whole lot of cool air. Should I ADD or increase by say 5% from 128-255 gram/sec to IAT/CTS table?

during drive I checked AE. On a decent throttle stab it was lean. So I added 10% to AE CTS mult.

Now I did correct the BPC since I upped FP from 19 lbs to 23.5 but I dont think that affected above.
Ronny is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 05:02 PM   #2
TGO Supporter
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 5,344

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: IAT/CTS Blend Q?

This is what I need answered: please..

I see 16 grams being 96% so I assume that might be idle scenario and biased to coolant temp for final pulse width. Now at other end gm/sec at 255 shows 70% of coolant so now I assume that is a whole lot of cool air. Should I ADD or increase by say 5% from 128-255 gram/sec to IAT/CTS table?
Ronny is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 09:43 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 11,386
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: IAT/CTS Blend Q?

If you wern't running an IAT previously, then added it and changed the blend to use the IAT, the AFR should be richer (not leaner). There reason is that the IAT/CTS value as used in the PW calculation will be a colder temperature.

Colder air, more fuel is added.

Since you changed the fuel pressure, FPR spring, and the BPC, that may be where the real issue is.

RBob.
__________________

www.DynamicEFI.com

'92 Camaro in Dark Green Gray Metallic
RBob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:38 PM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
Ronny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 5,344

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: IAT/CTS Blend Q?

I believe your last statement is correct. What I did was use Dom's calculated values for that table. Thanks again Dom. I dont have notes with me today but I believe he has same injectors(80's), CID and was using 20 lbs FP. I then recalculated 0 VAC/100 MAP values for BPC for 23.5 lbs FP. Then I changed the 10-90 VAC values by interpolating. I do not have a MightyVAC so I believed that to be best? My OL warm up period is now lean on WB. Once fully heat sinked then the idle OL is good. So maybe I should increase the BPC/VAC tables by 10% at 10-90 only leaving 0 VAC as is??? That should deliver more fuel. It is 30F these mornings in WI...
Ronny is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:38 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
blend, cts, iat, iatcts, values
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details