Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2009, 06:53 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
"sniffer" test done today, got some questions

Today I made the yearly "sniffer" test we have in Sweden.
I whas a bit worried as I have change so many things on the car since last year.
BUT im a bit confused about the results.
Lets start with my engine before the questions.

Vette -91
CSB355
9.8:1 comp
All forged internals.
Converted LT1 intake.
1:6 rrs
Full length headers, dual 2,5" with metallic race cats.
LT4 hotcam
JEGS Canfield 197cc heads
Malloy 6al ign box
6 spd manual

I tune the car myself, and im between 122-129 on the L-term BLMs.

The "sniffer" test here is first at idle, then "raised idle" to around 1500-2000rpm.

With everything hooked up my HC whas way to high.

HC: 350 ( 100 )


In other words, I did not pass.

BUT, what I did then, whas to Disconnect the EST. To get only base timing ( 8 degrees ). And the results where astonishing.

HC: 020
LAMBDA 1.02

So with this, I passed. ( This is even better results then on my Audi community car ).

With the EST connected I use 25 degrees at idle rpm, closed tps tabel.
And the car seems to like it, well atleast the drivability is good and idle is stabel.
But what can be wrong here?
Throw me a bone on what to look for. I havent got a clue.
Could my base tming be off? Im glad that I passed the test, but im also whery confused with the results.

Thanks

Anders

Last edited by devilfish; 06-03-2009 at 12:51 PM.
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 11:02 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,692
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
Re: "sniffer" test done today, got some questions

Cold cat? Did you have the engine running quite a while before the test, and let the RPM stay high a while before sticking the probe in the pipe? Running low timing has several benefits for an emission test - hotter exhaust = hotter cats, later timing means quench areas are exposed when the flame finally arrives, hotter exhaust = more afterburn, all reduce HC well and a little bit CO.

I think you wrote down the CO wrong, but not sure. Is it supposed to say .4 and .35 %, or is it 4% and 3.5%? Option A means just high HC, option B means it's running very very rich for what should be a closed loop system.
__________________
-Jeremy- EFI Calibration Engineer, Director of R&D, Software Designer, System Department Manager (Fuel Injection Technologies - dianpen.com) - Living in China since Nov '04!!!
86 Z28 - rusty, tired, needs to be put to sleep - 89 GTA 5.7L needs new paint and the parts on the shelf installed, 79 Malibu Classic with '91 L98, 4L60, 3.73
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 12:49 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 613

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: "sniffer" test done today, got some questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by RednGold86Z View Post
Cold cat? Did you have the engine running quite a while before the test, and let the RPM stay high a while before sticking the probe in the pipe? Running low timing has several benefits for an emission test - hotter exhaust = hotter cats, later timing means quench areas are exposed when the flame finally arrives, hotter exhaust = more afterburn, all reduce HC well and a little bit CO.

I think you wrote down the CO wrong, but not sure. Is it supposed to say .4 and .35 %, or is it 4% and 3.5%? Option A means just high HC, option B means it's running very very rich for what should be a closed loop system.
Thanks for the answer.

Coolant temp where 208 degrees Fahrenheit. I made several high rpm runs before I drove in to do the test.
Im sorry about the numbers, I wrote those wrong, I dont know what I got those numbers from?!?
Right now I cant fint the document, I get back to the exact numbers for CO and CO2500.
BUT what I remeber is, that HC whas the thing that stood out.
At idle I hade 350HC and at 2500rpm 170 HC.
And the trend whas that if we increased rpm the HC got better, and as the HC got better all the other values got better as well.
But we couldent get under 170.

And then when I disconnected the EST, the idle RPM droped, SES light came on, and the HC value just dropped like a stone.
Aswell as all the other values. And HC stayed on 20, both at idle and at 2500rpm.

Another thing, can it possible be a leaking intake gasget, that make the 02 read "wrong" ? I got a tiny amount of bucking at low rpm/low map. That I havent been abel to tune out 100%. Perhaps its related?
Thanks..

Last edited by devilfish; 06-03-2009 at 03:38 PM.
devilfish is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 12:49 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
hc, high, message, page, rpm, sniffer, test
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details