Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2009, 01:27 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 53
Car: Chevy Suburban-ish "Camaro" 1991
Engine: 383
Transmission: 4L80e

Classifieds Rating: (0)
BLM cell, BLM #, VE table???

As I am hopefully learning more and diving deeper into tuning I have a question/discussion related to the interaction of the BLM Cell, BLM readings, and the VE table.
If I understand it right, there are 19 cells that make up the BLM Cell table. Is that to say that there are only 19 learned BLM numbers at any given time? For Example: By observation, I see that at cruise the ECM is typically in cell 5. I also see that within cell 5 (holding a steady throttle) I could have a nice steady Integrator at 128, then if I change load (speed up or slow down a bit but still in cell 5) the Integrator will drop/rise and pull the BLM down/up. What this tells me is that my VE table is not optimized in the range of Cell 5 – Is that correct? Is it that each BLM Cell has a range of VE points and those VE points each have to be optimized for a 128 BLM reading? If not optimized, as you change load within a BLM Cell the integrator/BLM will always be running up and down to correct fuelling.
If what I am exploring above is correct, then I think that I have discovered why I have been having a difficult time stabilizing the Integrator/BLMs at certain points. I have been chasing a stable setting at low RPM/Loads but probably only looking at too narrow a region of VE cells. As I chase 128 in one part of a BLM cell I do not correct the rest of it, so the integrator is constantly running up and down.

Hopefully I am on the right track with this. I am looking for feedback so that I can continue to learn more about how these systems are designed and operate.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Keith91sub is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 10-02-2009, 08:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
bl85c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 1,345
Car: '85 maro
Engine: LB8
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: BLM cell, BLM #, VE table???

There's 16 BLM cells. The way the rpm/load constants are set determines how those cells cover the motor's normal operating range. Not all are used either, only 5 are typically used and even then only 2 are saved after shutdown. There's no dedicated connection between the ve table and blm cells, the two simply overlap based on the rpm/load constants used. When you tune the ve table you tune every entry not groups based on what blm cell it's in, although that would be a good way to rough in a tune. Tuning needs to be done steady state in each entry (which is why an emulator Kicks a$$) until it's 128/128 everywhere. The tune will vary a bit based on weather so most people won't tune closer than +-2 counts. You might lock the blm to 128 and just use the int to make tuning a little simpler.
__________________
1985 Camaro LB8 smoothed & balanced to perfection. Abscence of excess is excellence.



________________________________________________________
Increasingly I find the difference between a 'fact' and an oppinion is the number of people who believe it.

Last edited by bl85c; 10-02-2009 at 08:16 PM.
bl85c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 11:07 PM   #3
doc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 1,991
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: BLM cell, BLM #, VE table???

As given above, there are 16 fuel trim cells (FTC). They are arranged in a 4 x 4 pattern, based on engine RPM and MAF air flow. Now, I am tuning a MAF car, your FTC boundaries might be set up on engine RPM and engine load, if you are tuning a speed density car. There is a unique BLM and INT value for each FTC. The ideal values or baseline is the value 128. If you have BLM values between 122 and 134, consider your ECM tuned perfectly. For you, a higher VE value in the VE table will add more fuel, while the opposite is true. Therefore, if you have a BLM value of 155, the ECM is adding value on top of the base fuel calculation, to get you to stoich. In order to bring the BLM value down closer to 128, you should increase the values in the VE table that match up with the FTC that is at 155. Also, it is important to note that the BLM value is kept in memory for the next startup, while the INT value is set back to 128 when you shut the engine off.
__________________
'87 L98 TPI IROCZ, 395cu.in. ZZ4 block (.030" over bore), ported Holley StealthRam; 3.875" Callies DragonSlayer crank, 5.85" Eagle H-beam rods, 14cc dished SRP pistons part# 148988, AFR190 heads, 3.70 rear gears, 224*/230* 114*LSA 0.530/0.536 lift CompCams cam, 1.6 roller rockers, 3000 Art Carr TC, SLP 1 3/4" headers, SLP cat-back, no cat, no AC, MAF w/o screens, 30#/hr Ford injectors, 52mm TB with airfoil, TB coolant bypass, Lay Ind. ram air kit, SS Brakes 1LE upgrade 12" rotors dual piston calipers, turbo TransAm fuel pump, K.Brown weld-on subframes. Rear tires: P295/35R18 BFG Drag Radials.
Best ET 12.12 sec @ 110.55 mph @ Milan.
With 395, ET 12.197 sec @ 113.65 mph @ Milan.
With 350, ET 12.97sec @ 105mph M/T ET Streets.
Best with HSR: ET 12.385 sec @ 108mph @ OSW.
doc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > DIY PROM

Tags
128, blm, blms, boundaries, cell, cells, constantly, ecm, int, reading, tables, tpi, tune, tuning, ve
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.