DIY PROMDo It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
Yesterday I posted in another thread that my MAT reading was 392*. I checked this afternoon with the harness disconnected from the sensor and got the same reading (I suspected this would be the case). The laptop I was using locked on me so I grabbed my other that has TPv4 installed. Using v4, the MAT reads correctly (87.xx*).
I compared the ADS to current ADX and couldn't really see any differences, but I also know nothing about the guts of how the programming works.
Any ideas to what my issue may be?
This ad is not displayed to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________ Dustin
'87 MCSS
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad. Click here to register for free!
If so look at the equasion for the MAT, when I first started using V5, I imported the ADS I had been using in V4, and the MAT value was stuck at -40, no matter what, so I replaced the MAT sensor, instead of switching back to V4. ( :facepalm: ), but still showed the same -40 value, turned out that the MAT equasion was imported wrong. I was using $59, but the same thing may be happening to you.
__________________ If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Last edited by Six_Shooter; 10-12-2009 at 07:46 PM.
I did that, but, like I said, I couldn't really see any differences.
Did you look at the "conversion tab"? It's at the bottom of that pop-up screen, and has teh equasion right at the top of the tab. If all you saw was the name of the variable and adress for it, along with min and max values you weren't on the right tab.
According the ADS file that I imported, the MAT uses only a lookup table and no equation; this was the same with both the ADS (v4) and the ADX (v5). Would I be fine to give it the same equation at the Coolant Temp Sensor?
I just did an import myself of an S_AUJP .ads, using the latest version of V5 and the "equasion" comes up as "87" for me, this is NOT an equasion. The equasion should be " X ", without the quotation marks.
__________________ If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
