Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2004, 05:30 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: long island NY
Posts: 180

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to mess21
LS1 5.7 vs 6.0???

whats the differences between the 5.7 LS1 out of f-y bodys and the 6.0 out of the trucks??? i'm really only asking about the short block since i will be changin the intake which i know is different and the cam and heads which i'm guessing are different??? also are there different 6.0 engines like trucks compared to SUVs???

thanx for any info
__________________
92 Z-28 1LE purple haze metalic
tranny-trans-go shift kit, corvette servo, deep pan, b&m console megashifter
full hotchkis rear
jet stage 2 chip
k&n's
160* stat
16" centerline 5stars
autometer gagues include 5"sport-comp tach
ultra-lights:
air-fuel ratio
electrical oil pressure
mess21 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 05:59 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I don't know all the ins and outs on this yet but I too am considering an LS1 type engine and here is what I have found. There are no bolt up issues or differences between the truck 6.0 and the car 5.7 aside from the oil pan needing to be matched to application. The truck 6.0 engines consist of two types. One has cast iron heads and the other has aluminum heads. The cast iron head mills are lousy and should be viewed as a short block throw away the heads... but the aluminum head versions have incredible performance pontential. From what I have read the head design is very simlar to the LS6 head found in the Z06 vettes. The hard part is finding one. They come in Denali yukons and Escalades for sure and there may be some that were used in pick ups but I have heard conflicting opinions on that. Regardless an aluminum head 6.0 is the one to find. I am sure there is more but thats what I have found thus far.
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 06:29 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
tamatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,571
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to tamatt27 Send a message via Yahoo to tamatt27
I THINK the truck 6.0 has an iron block. The only aluminum 6.0 is the LS2, I think!
tamatt27 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 06:45 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,167

Classifieds Rating: (21)
Simply put the 5.7 LS1 out of a 2000+ Camaro/Firebird is the best choice when looking at an LSx Engine for a thirdgen
__________________
FLYNLOW92rs is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 07:23 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 829

Classifieds Rating: (0)
http://www.gm.com/automotive/gmpower...ehicle/lq9.htm

Correct on the Block being IRON other wise they are basically the LS2 block in Iron form. and If what I read about resleeving an LS block is like 2K then .... if you want a 6 liter (MPFI LS STYLE) it could be more worth while (to get the LQ4/9) but you would give up the aluminum block for IRON .... wouldn't be a bad swap, but you would have more custom work cause it came out of a truck, which now adays has no relation to a 3rdgen.
Drakar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 10:48 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
There was a great article in last months Hot Rod or Car Craft or? I read so many I can't find which one has it . Anyways they had a real specific breakdown of all the new gen engines from GM right down to the Northstar caddy motors about which one to use etc. and thats where I learned about the alum head 6.0 truck heads having amazing potential. If you search on camaroz28.com you will find some info on these heads as well. When it comes to making horsepower theres no replacement for displacement

cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2004, 10:36 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: South of Heaven, North of Hell
Posts: 1,152
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: .040" over 350
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt with 3.45s

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I read that the iron block truck engines weigh only 65 pounds more than the equivalent aluminum block, fully dressed. I assume that is with the aluminum heads.

SLP has some 402 short blocks. They dropped a 4" stroke crank in a block. Add some good heads, a truck intake and you have one heck of an engine.

One recent mag, might have been Super Chevy, did a test on intakes. The truck intake, because it's taller, put out more power than any other (Weiand has a great looking polished aluminum intake, but at about $1,000, it's too expensive.)
Parrydise7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2004, 11:57 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 44
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: A4...soon M5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to kin's87GTA
This is weird because tonite I was flipping through the Sept. 04 Chevy High Performance (the one with Kandiedz's car in it) and on page 122 they have an article called "My Great 408". Here's a quick summary of the article. Early LS engine trucks were equipped with the LQ4 and LQ9 iron-block engine with a standard bore of 4.000 inches and stroke of 4.000 inches (382 ci). Bored to 4.030 in with the 4.000 stroke, you get 408 ci. The 6.0 liter block weighs 180 lbs, while the ls1 block weighs 87 lbs. All ls1 parts carry over except for windage tray and oil-can pickup. CHP then procedes to do a total cost $8500 buildup that gives max hp 592@6300 and torque 553@4700. Hope that helps!

Matt
kin's87GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 05:37 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 3,109
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Z28ricer
Quote:
Originally posted by kin's87GTA
This is weird because tonite I was flipping through the Sept. 04 Chevy High Performance (the one with Kandiedz's car in it) and on page 122 they have an article called "My Great 408". Here's a quick summary of the article. Early LS engine trucks were equipped with the LQ4 and LQ9 iron-block engine with a standard bore of 4.000 inches and stroke of 4.000 inches (382 ci). Bored to 4.030 in with the 4.000 stroke, you get 408 ci. The 6.0 liter block weighs 180 lbs, while the ls1 block weighs 87 lbs. All ls1 parts carry over except for windage tray and oil-can pickup. CHP then procedes to do a total cost $8500 buildup that gives max hp 592@6300 and torque 553@4700. Hope that helps!

Matt
The truck 6.0's have the same stroke as the 5.7 and 5.3, 3.622, the 6.0 is 364 Ci , adding the 4" crank and .030 over takes em to 408, they do not have a 4" stroke crank already or they would be over 400 ci stock.
Z28ricer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 11:18 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,952
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Truck engines tend to go cheaper than F-body ones at the junkyard. A quick search on www.car-parts.com junkyard stuff shows 6.0L truck engines available. I like the truck wiring harness PCM location better also, wish I'd thought of that when I did my LS1 swap. The truck has it up front under the batt tray, nice location on a 3rd gen also.
__________________
-------------------------------------------
'82 Z28
'01 LS1, Davis T56
kevinc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 04:43 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 509
Car: '82 Trans Am
Engine: Blown 540 BBC
Transmission: TH475
Axle/Gears: Dana 60, 4.10 w/spool

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Be aware that there are different variations of both the 5.7 and 6.0 GEN III engines, depending upon what model (F, Y body or truck) and what year it is. The '01 and later 6.0 engines all have Corvette style aluminum heads and the actual LS1 Corvette camshaft. I got one in my HD2500, and the 3 ton beast scoots pretty good. In essence, the 6.0 liter is mechanically just a larger displacement LS1 Corvette engine, but with an iron block and a different intake manifold. It's a great engine, if you can find one. The high output LQ9 6.0 engines (345 hp rated) are essentially the same as the regular LQ4 6.0 engines, except for slightly higher compression and full floating pistons. The power difference is mainly in the cal.
__________________
MCM

The TA in action
Motor City Mike is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 06:07 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: long island NY
Posts: 180

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to mess21
Quote:
Be aware that there are different variations of both the 5.7 and 6.0 GEN III engines, depending upon what model (F, Y body or truck) and what year it is. The '01 and later 6.0 engines all have Corvette style aluminum heads and the actual LS1 Corvette camshaft. I got one in my HD2500, and the 3 ton beast scoots pretty good.
what is the code for that 6.0 truck engine the one with the alum heads and vette cam?
mess21 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:03 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Simply put the 5.7 LS1 out of a 2000+ Camaro/Firebird is the best choice when looking at an LSx Engine for a thirdgen
Why? I am trying to learn as much as I can about these engines, because I think I may try a carb'd one for my next swap. From what I have read so far, the truck engine would be better, maybe with some modifications. More cubes = more potential. Or is there some limiting factor in the 6.0 truck models?
ljnowell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:04 PM   #14
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The best thing about the aluminum head truck engine is although the cam may be the same as an LS1 the heads are suposedly very similar to the LS6 ZO6 Vette so the pontential is there for serious power with little more than a cam swap and good tuning. Especially when you consider the ZO6 is rated at 405 horse
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:09 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 509
Car: '82 Trans Am
Engine: Blown 540 BBC
Transmission: TH475
Axle/Gears: Dana 60, 4.10 w/spool

Classifieds Rating: (0)
All of the 6.0L Gen III engines are either RPO LQ4 or LQ9. Only the '01 and later LQ4's come equipped with the Vette parts, while all the LQ9's (which are much more scarce) come with the same good Vette style heads and cam.
__________________
MCM

The TA in action
Motor City Mike is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:20 PM   #16
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have only seen the aluminum head version in Escalades or Denali's do you know if they put them in regular trucks too?
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:48 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 509
Car: '82 Trans Am
Engine: Blown 540 BBC
Transmission: TH475
Axle/Gears: Dana 60, 4.10 w/spool

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 87roc_t56
I have only seen the aluminum head version in Escalades or Denali's do you know if they put them in regular trucks too?
Yes, my '01 HD2500 has 'em (LQ4). The Denali's and Escalades have the LQ9 engine, which all have the aluminum heads also. As I had previously said, all '01 and later LQ4's (available in "reqular" full size trucks) have the aluminum heads and the LS1 Vette cam also.
__________________
MCM

The TA in action
Motor City Mike is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 07:50 PM   #18
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Sweet Thanks dude:lala:
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2004, 01:02 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: P'cola
Posts: 646
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4 that will magically turn into a 6 speed one day.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by ljnowell
Why? I am trying to learn as much as I can about these engines, because I think I may try a carb'd one for my next swap. From what I have read so far, the truck engine would be better, maybe with some modifications. More cubes = more potential. Or is there some limiting factor in the 6.0 truck models?
Because he just spent 10K on his LS1 engine and has to justify it. You are right though, more cubes equals more power potential. The Iron block has more power potential than the LS1, why do you think the LS2 is 6.0L?? Just about everything is interchangeable from the LS1 to the 6.0L. Grab a 6.0L short block, some 5.3L aluminum heads (also from a truck), and a good camshaft and you could make some really good power....even moreso if you stroke it or bore it. Basically if you want a good bang for buck, the 6.0L short block would be the way to go. If you have an almost unlimited budget, get a LS6 block, and go for the 427 Lingenfelter kit.

Last edited by 305RSlc; 07-15-2004 at 01:04 AM.
305RSlc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 09:07 PM   #20
KiLLJ0Y
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

my 03 Yukon with the 5.3 has aluminum heads.. ive put a cold air intake and a CJS full exhaust on it(would sound bad *** on an LS1 F-body too) and its fast.. i love the Kon now.. really woke it up. and yep its 2 wheel drive
vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2004, 11:32 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 87roc_t56
There was a great article in last months Hot Rod or Car Craft or? I read so many I can't find which one has it . Anyways they had a real specific breakdown of all the new gen engines from GM right down to the Northstar caddy motors about which one to use etc. and thats where I learned about the alum head 6.0 truck heads having amazing potential.

I tried searching out the articles you mentioned here and I had no luck.
Any chance you could locate a link to those or give some more specific information?
I'm a noob to the whole LS1, LS6 etc. scene and still a bit confused about what's what and where it comes from, and it sounds like this article could be helpful.

Thanks
Streetiron85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2004, 01:52 AM   #22
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have since looked all over and I still cannot find it. I am pretty certain it was Hot Rod May or June issue from this year or possibly Car Craft but there was also info on Ford and Mopar engines so it was not a Chev only mag. I only buy the ones that interest me so i can't nail it down by which months are missing as each month i get different ones. I have two brothers and many passerby's at the shop and this isn't the first time that i cannot find something i know I have If I run accross it i will update this thread. Wish I could be of more help.
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2004, 03:12 PM   #23
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Aha! I found it finally. April 2004 Hot Rod issue. Junkyard Jewels article. Streetiron85 you have a PM
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2004, 05:14 PM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: long island NY
Posts: 180

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to mess21
ok so the weight of the alum 5.7 block is 87lbs and the 6.0 iron is somethin like 180. how much does the L98 weigh? i think i read in another post that the all alum LS1 actually raises the front of the car do to the less weight. also for all those intrested the newest issuse of chevy hi performance has a nice build up on both a 6.0 iron block and a 5.7 alum block. i aslo found out the the 6.0L in 2003+ trucks is also all alum
mess21 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2004, 09:56 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 87roc_t56
Aha! I found it finally. April 2004 Hot Rod issue. Junkyard Jewels article. Streetiron85 you have a PM
For some reason I didn't recieve that PM.
Thanks for locating the article for us tho.
Streetiron85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2004, 11:53 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: P'cola
Posts: 646
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4 that will magically turn into a 6 speed one day.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by mess21
ok so the weight of the alum 5.7 block is 87lbs and the 6.0 iron is somethin like 180. how much does the L98 weigh? i think i read in another post that the all alum LS1 actually raises the front of the car do to the less weight. also for all those intrested the newest issuse of chevy hi performance has a nice build up on both a 6.0 iron block and a 5.7 alum block. i aslo found out the the 6.0L in 2003+ trucks is also all alum
I believe an empty bare SBC weighs like 150lbs....maybe I'm a bit off, don't know for sure. But yes, the weight, or lack thereof, of the LS1 will raise the car anywhere from 1/2" to 1" from what people have said. And yes, CHP did a 408cid iron block truck engine with aluminum heads I think, and made almost 600 streetable hp...I think it was like 594...I'll look it up later though. That's a very impressive N/A hp number from any engine that can still be driven daily.
305RSlc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 08:13 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 87roc_t56
Aha! I found it finally. April 2004 Hot Rod issue. Junkyard Jewels article. Streetiron85 you have a PM
I found a Junkyard Gems article, and some other interesting stuff, but nothing in there about genIII blocks.
Still no PM either.
Makes me wonder if maybe there are other PMs I'm missing too, because of some glitch.
Streetiron85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 09:27 AM   #28
Supreme Member
 
cam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 2,052
Car: 1987 Iroc + 1989 R7U 1LE Players
Engine: 6.2L L92 and LB9 5.0L
Transmission: T56 and WC T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You have another one
cam- is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 09:27 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Tags
57, 60, block, budget, build, chevy, dressed, engine, fully, lq9, ls1, pounds, stroke, weighs, weight
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details