 | |
11-27-2004, 09:28 AM
|
#101 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Posts: 1,077
Car: '87 Mustang LX Engine: 5.0 Transmission: T-5 | Quote: Originally posted by flyitlikustolit Isn't the eagle piece steel? | The Eagle cranks are cast.
Crower may be coming out with a steel 4.25" crank early next year. |
| |
11-29-2004, 12:19 PM
|
#102 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 776
Car: 1982 Trans Am Engine: 383 chevy Transmission: T-5 Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10-bolt, posi, 3.42 ratio | I know it's cast.... but is it cast steel or cast iron? |
| |
11-29-2004, 03:03 PM
|
#103 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 2,249
Car: 1987 Trans Am Engine: 455 Transmission: TH400 | Pretty sure they're cast steel...should be better than cast iron, at least. I should have been clearer in my post; I'm old school, and sometimes refer to forged cranks as "steel" cranks, even though the newer "cast steel" cranks sort of confuse things.
Last edited by LT1guy : 11-29-2004 at 03:05 PM.
|
| |
11-30-2004, 11:27 AM
|
#104 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: back in VA
Posts: 4,338
Car: 94 Camaro / 99 GPGT / 06 CTS Engine: 3.4 / 3800 II / 3.6 Transmission: T-5 / 4T60E /5T40E Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / 3.23 open / 3.42 posi | I an back issue of HPP, they did an article on how to 455 your 400. They liked the stock nodular iron crank, as it had a little flex and wouldn't break as fast as a stiff forged crank could. I'll see abot finding it & scannig it for y'all. |
| |
11-30-2004, 07:24 PM
|
#105 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 776
Car: 1982 Trans Am Engine: 383 chevy Transmission: T-5 Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10-bolt, posi, 3.42 ratio | sweet. Am I wrong in thinking you can easily use a stock 455 crank in a 400 block? the main journal sizes are different, and everything I've read or heard (mostly heard) says to sell it and buy a new one, because the bearings won't fit right, and it'll cost too much money to machine. is this true? or is it really worth using the crank i have? also, will the stock crank take 700 HP N/A? |
| |
12-01-2004, 09:47 AM
|
#107 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Dallas, Ga
Posts: 84
Car: 88 Formula Engine: soon pontiac 400 Transmission: turbo 350 | The problem you are gonna have when trying to use a 455 crank turned down to fit in the 400 block is the thrust bearing clearance issue. Custom bearings to fix the problem runs about $150.00. Plus the cost of machine work on the crank. If a 455 crank is used in a 400 block with stock rods , you dont have to get customs pistons, just get the appropiate 455 piston with the right size bore. But you would have to clearance the block for the added crank throw. My opinion would be to buy the Eagle crank & bbc 6.8 rods and Ross pistons to do the conversion. Much more reliable and stronger than using a 20 yr old stock crank that has been modified. Especially if you plan to make some brute power.
__________________ |
| |
12-05-2004, 11:26 PM
|
#108 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 776
Car: 1982 Trans Am Engine: 383 chevy Transmission: T-5 Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10-bolt, posi, 3.42 ratio | thanks for the help guys. I'll get the eagle stroker kit. |
| |
12-06-2004, 12:18 PM
|
#109 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 2,249
Car: 1987 Trans Am Engine: 455 Transmission: TH400 | Speaking of brute power...anyone else see the new Tiger heads? 400+ cfm!!!!! A little pricey though at over $5000, but at least more parts are becoming available for our engines. |
| |
12-06-2004, 01:18 PM
|
#110 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Dallas, Ga
Posts: 84
Car: 88 Formula Engine: soon pontiac 400 Transmission: turbo 350 | Quote: Originally posted by LT1guy Speaking of brute power...anyone else see the new Tiger heads? 400+ cfm!!!!! A little pricey though at over $5000, but at least more parts are becoming available for our engines. | Havent seen those yet.
__________________ |
| |
12-07-2004, 05:52 PM
|
#111 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 2,249
Car: 1987 Trans Am Engine: 455 Transmission: TH400 | They're advertised in the new HPP. There is also an article on the new KRE heads, with drag results comparing with worked 6Xs. |
| |
12-09-2004, 12:32 AM
|
#112 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: D/FW texas
Posts: 1
Car: 1983 trans am Engine: 469ci Pontiac Transmission: th350 | Quote: Originally posted by SOLID LIFTER The Eagle cranks are cast.
Crower may be coming out with a steel 4.25" crank early next year. | Right after the AMC! |
| |
12-09-2004, 09:47 PM
|
#113 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: back in VA
Posts: 4,338
Car: 94 Camaro / 99 GPGT / 06 CTS Engine: 3.4 / 3800 II / 3.6 Transmission: T-5 / 4T60E /5T40E Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / 3.23 open / 3.42 posi | Quote: Originally posted by LT1guy They're advertised in the new HPP. There is also an article on the new KRE heads, with drag results comparing with worked 6Xs. | KRE, that's that Ohio place I couldn't remember  |
| |
01-05-2005, 03:23 PM
|
#114 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Davis, IL
Posts: 107
Car: 91 Camaro RS Engine: SBC Transmission: 700r4 | Sweet swap...I wanted to put a poncho engine in my 84 Z...Im considering it as the next engine for my 91RS. With all the parts and build up info that has come out for these engines I think they would make killer street racing engines. Ya cant tell the CID from the outside cuz they all look the same and weight really wouldn't be a problem with aluminum heads. Anyhow, great swap and good info. Its always nice to see alternative engine swaps.
Last edited by BaddAzzRS : 01-05-2005 at 03:26 PM.
|
| |
01-18-2005, 02:51 PM
|
#115 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 32
| I'm suprised at some many knowledgable Pontiac guys here!
A Torker II would be a good intake and have 1 1/2" better hood clearance than the Performer RPM pictured.
There was a gut running a third gen Firebird in the NMCA street classes running in the 9s with a fairly stock drivetrain.
As was said the thrust bearing width is the problem adding to the swap of a 455 crank turned down into a 3" main block like a 400.
The 6X -4 heads are the more desireable heads and ARE off a 350 or a 78/79 220 hp TA 6.6 motor. They are around 93cc compared to a 98-100cc 6x-8. Put a 455 right at 9.5:1.
No forged or billet cranks unless you get a $2500 custom one but the cast cranks will get you plenty of HP. The big weakness problem besides the cast rods(lots of affordable steel rods now adays) is the block . Big rollers can break out the lifter bores and need bracing. With the new IA block it is braced and you can make a 505 ci Pontiac motor.
Down side is the head flow. Close to what racing SBC flow to feed 455 or more ci!
Edelbrock now has a EFI manifolds based on the shorter Torker II and just out one on the Victor and fuel rails for both,no compleete systems yet. The Torker II uses a special shorter injector that Edelbrock uses on many of their systems.
Alot of cool stuff out for the "traditional" Pontiac motor. And thye look cool in a third gen also. |
| |
01-23-2005, 12:40 AM
|
#116 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: back in VA
Posts: 4,338
Car: 94 Camaro / 99 GPGT / 06 CTS Engine: 3.4 / 3800 II / 3.6 Transmission: T-5 / 4T60E /5T40E Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / 3.23 open / 3.42 posi | fwiw, my 77T/A had the 6x-4 heads. might 've been the W-72 option |
| |
02-08-2005, 04:05 AM
|
#117 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | finally got the driveshaft made and got it rolling down the road. only have one thing to say. OMG!!! lol. |
| |
02-08-2005, 08:02 AM
|
#118 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Dallas, Ga
Posts: 84
Car: 88 Formula Engine: soon pontiac 400 Transmission: turbo 350 | have you put a hood on it yet?
i test fitted my motor in mu Formula and it looks like I'm going to have clearance problems with the air cleaner and alternater bracket. |
| |
02-08-2005, 07:39 PM
|
#119 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | there is an clearance problem with the alternator bracket. you could cut a 1/2" from the alternator bracket but i do not like that idea. for some reason the site is not lettin me attach the pic i have with the hood on.
Last edited by Kross4031 : 02-09-2005 at 03:31 AM.
|
| |
02-09-2005, 09:12 PM
|
#120 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | pic |
| |
02-14-2005, 06:37 AM
|
#121 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: back in VA
Posts: 4,338
Car: 94 Camaro / 99 GPGT / 06 CTS Engine: 3.4 / 3800 II / 3.6 Transmission: T-5 / 4T60E /5T40E Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / 3.23 open / 3.42 posi | all you need is just the right scoop....... maybe a cowl induction one, just close enough to the windshield to be functional, yet drivable in rain if need be......  |
| |
02-15-2005, 10:07 PM
|
#122 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | yeah .. 3" cowl would work, but 6" would be better. hell if i had the cash i would stick an 871 blower on it and have the butterflies above the roof line... the more motor the better, at least in my book. ya know .. that might be my next add on. what's another 3-4k ... lol |
| |
02-19-2005, 11:48 AM
|
#123 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Chucks SC
Posts: 7
Car: 70GTO/79Formula/98Formula Engine: 455/467/LS1 Transmission: TH400/4L60E | Wow you guys got Skip to reply. So have you had it to a track yet, or just been bombin around the street? I almost have mine street ready, still needs a bunch of tunning and a few more parts. The Eagle crank and rods make for an awesome setup. They are inside the 400 block out in the parkin lot now. JBP did most of my machinework and CNC ported the heads, I would love to drop that thing in something lighter, and 3rd gens can get lighter than 2nd gens can cheaper.
There is no way the Victor/Dominator is going to fit under the hood of any stock body/suspension F body. Mine sits about 3" higher than the fenders and a 4" cowl barely covers it.
Get some times from that thing, and 500hp is soooo easy to get from a 455 its scary. |
| |
02-21-2005, 01:52 PM
|
#124 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | had it dyno'd at 447 h.p. with very little mod's. it's not street ready .. still need a few more things. but i did have it down the road a bit and there is nothing that car can do to keep the tires planted. lemme rephrase that.. unless i tub it.
Last edited by Kross4031 : 02-21-2005 at 06:37 PM.
|
| |
03-21-2005, 06:10 PM
|
#125 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: back in VA
Posts: 4,338
Car: 94 Camaro / 99 GPGT / 06 CTS Engine: 3.4 / 3800 II / 3.6 Transmission: T-5 / 4T60E /5T40E Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / 3.23 open / 3.42 posi | any times yet......from track or speeding tickets???  |
| |
03-21-2005, 06:33 PM
|
#126 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Michigan
Posts: 81
Car: 86 IROC Engine: Pontiac 455 Transmission: TH350 | not yet .. i plan to have it ready for the road in a month ... |
| |
03-24-2005, 10:14 PM
|
#127 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 776
Car: 1982 Trans Am Engine: 383 chevy Transmission: T-5 Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10-bolt, posi, 3.42 ratio | anybody know where i can find a bellhousing and a flywheel to bolt a t56 to a poncho? or is this impossible ? i think mcleod makes all the parts, but i'm not sure. just trying to figure out how i'm gonna contain the power. I make just tick my th350 on my poncho and swap in a t56 in my chevy powered bird.
any thoughts? Mcleod's website is down, so i couldn't find anything. |
| |
03-25-2005, 07:46 AM
|
#128 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 2,249
Car: 1987 Trans Am Engine: 455 Transmission: TH400 | McLeod makes everything...the modular bellhousing, dual disc clutch (had one in my SS...nice!), hydraulic throwout bearing, master/slave cylinders, etc. This is the route I'm taking, after lots of thought. Mine is going to use either Wilwood or Tilton master cylinders though (for brake and clutch), since I'm going with aftermarket pedals (with a dash-adjustable balance bar).
High Performance Pontiac has done articles on the T56 swap before...PM me your address and I'll send you copies (don't have a scanner right now). |
| |
04-12-2005, 06:11 PM
|
#129 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: N. Syracuse, NY
Posts: 83
Car: 99 Subaru, 92 GMC Van, 95 Bonnie Engine: LOTS of them Transmission: LOTS of those too. | sticky? Really not much info in here to be considered a sticky.. I was expecting something like pics of brackets, info, measurements, etc. Sources would be nice for parts. I have an 86 TA with a Pontiac 400 about to go in it. have already run into problems, although minor, but none the less, hold ups.
One of the biggest points no one mentioned is that even a pontiac 400 motor with some VERY mild mods will most likely snap rear ends like twigs. My 400 used to be in a 73 catalina and in bone stock 2 bbl, single 2.5" exhaust format, had PLEEEEENTY of torque to roast the tires on a 4800lb car.
Anyways.. if this sticky were redone with all the good information put in it, it'd be great.. just seems too confusing reading thru all the "big block - small block" BS arguments and which is better, chevy, ford, blah blah.. Pontiacs are far easier to work on than ALOT of engines out there. the thing no one can argue though is pontiacs had more torque than any manufacturer in bone stock trim.
but anyways.. I'm trying to take pics of my swap as I go and write down pertinent info to hopefully add to this sticky. otherwise, I'll just write my own article on what I did.
Thanks for the opening pics though. |
| | | | |