Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-2009, 04:50 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
New2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,257
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: LT1 383 Soon
Transmission: Built T-56 Soon
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 Bolt Tru Trac 4.10 Soon

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via MSN to New2Chevy
Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

As I continued my research on what 383 parts to buy, I found that the Dart Pro 1 200 head is recommended for my 383, but if I were to go with an RHS Pro Action head, RHS recommends their 220 head for the 383. I thought this was interesting and also a little mind boggling. I guess the two heads flow DIFFERENTLY, therefore, necessitating a bigger intake port on the RHS head, to satisfy the 383's breathing requirements?? Seems kinda weird, to me, and both are aluminum heads.

Last edited by New2Chevy; 08-02-2009 at 05:40 PM.
New2Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 05:40 PM   #2
On Probation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 5,261
Car: '84 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LQ9 w/ Wegner LS6 heads
Transmission: 4L60E, seeking good used NV3550HD
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, posi, swapping to 8.5"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

no, that's not the issue. If you're going to do a 383, first decide between long-runner TPI versus either a short runner efi or carb. If you're going long-runner, that limits the rpm range, and a 180cc head might do, a 195-200 cc head would be more than enough. But between a 200 or a 220, that depends mostly on your rpm range. If you want 6500+ rpm frequently, a 215+ cc head from either of them would be the choice. Pick your induction, rpm range and cubic inches, then buy the best heads you can afford, then choose cam and gears.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2009, 08:00 PM   #3
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,966
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

Head flow data, Not all heads are the same and it's not just about flow numbers.
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tablehdc.htm
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2009, 12:27 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
New2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,257
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: LT1 383 Soon
Transmission: Built T-56 Soon
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 Bolt Tru Trac 4.10 Soon

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via MSN to New2Chevy
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

Ok, thanks guys. I'm definitely going with a mini ram intake, so it seems I'll need the 220 from RHS, from what they said. To add to what Atilla The Fun said above, TPIS told me I would only need the 200 in the Dart head, and that would make 530 hp on my particular setup, with the mini ram, with an rpm range going up to 7200. Why would RHS say I need their 220, and then TPIS says I only need the 200 in the Dart head? This is the issue that is confusing. I mean...TPIS knows fuel injection stuff very well, and I believed them when they told me the Dart 200 is a good choice. It's just weird that I would need to go up to 220 in the RHS head, according to RHS, with everything else the same on my setup. I'm confused. I guess I could go with the RHS 220 and get the engine tuned and just see what happens.

Last edited by New2Chevy; 08-05-2009 at 01:12 AM.
New2Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2009, 12:50 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
New2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,257
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: LT1 383 Soon
Transmission: Built T-56 Soon
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 Bolt Tru Trac 4.10 Soon

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via MSN to New2Chevy
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

I'll go with the RHS 200 because it's better to go smaller than too big, when it comes to intake runner volume. I don't want to have to rev my engine up to 8000 rpms, to get my power where I want it.

Last edited by New2Chevy; 08-05-2009 at 01:12 AM.
New2Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 05:08 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ogden UT
Posts: 742
Car: '88 Camaro (Gone...)

Classifieds Rating: (15)
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

Did you ever get these, and if so how do you like them? I'm looking at the RHS 200's, but there's not a lot of people running them, so not much info out there.
Primetime91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 11:08 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
New2Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,257
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: LT1 383 Soon
Transmission: Built T-56 Soon
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 Bolt Tru Trac 4.10 Soon

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via MSN to New2Chevy
Re: Interesting note about RHS Vs. Dart Head

I am far away from building an engine big enough to utilize these heads, so I have not got them yet.
New2Chevy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 11:08 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Tags
200, action, dart, data, flow, forum, head, heads, pro, pro1, racing, reviews, rhs, service, tpis
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details