Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-04-2009, 11:58 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
last_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 74
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
lm7

how come i dont see more of y'all goin for the 325 or 5.3 liter version of the lq4? it makes very good power and is just as responsive as the 6 liter but weights less. on top of that is about half as expensive! i have certainly changed my mind from the 6.0L LQ4 too the 5.3L LM7... If I cant sway your opinion maybe this carcraft article can:

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html

Happy trails and god bless third gens everywhere!

This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
last_ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 09-04-2009, 01:53 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
1A Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lowell, MA
Posts: 441
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Carbed
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

a lot of the guys have been going with the genIII-genIV blocks recently. I think you'll see more people going for the less powerful version only because they are quite plentiful (meaning very cheap ). Since they are easy to find and cheap to get, there's more money to improve it to similar or better power levels.

I'm still hunting a lsx family block myself. we shall see what the next few days shall bring......
__________________

1987 Trans Am, work in progress
2008 Pontiac G8
Retired: 1984 Camaro "ZF" 2.8L, 1989 Camaro RS
Customer Service Manager, 1A Auto Parts
1A Dan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2009, 03:32 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
last_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 74
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1A Dan View Post
I'm still hunting a lsx family block myself. we shall see what the next few days shall bring......
Well then, happy hunting friend!
last_ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:19 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

The LM7 doesn't weigh less than the LQ4. Get real. But I did go with the LM7, and I don't regret it.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:21 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

The LM7 weighs the same as the LQ4. Get real. But I did get the LM7, and I don't regret it.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 09:26 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
chevyowner02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingsport Tenn
Posts: 843
Car: 1992 camaro
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to chevyowner02
Re: lm7

I was thinking about the LM7 when the LT1 gose south, but around here the 6.0 is $300-400 more. Plus if I have to use f-body brackets,oil pan and so on I belive I'll spent the extra to get the 6.0 the 5.3 is a good choice though.
chevyowner02 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 07:40 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
last_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 74
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun View Post
The LM7 weighs the same as the LQ4. Get real. But I did get the LM7, and I don't regret it.
where do you get your data from? cause if you're right i will probly change my mind to a 6 liter.
last_ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 10:05 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

If anything, the 5.3 is slightly heavier. Forgetting the undesirable pre-'01 versions, all the iron truck blocks use the same water jackets, same exterior, same iron, same everything, except the 6.0 blocks are bored larger, which removes more heavy iron. Yes, the larger aluminum pistons add part of that weight difference back. Both also use aluminum heads, but the 6.0 uses larger valves that are just slightly heavier. Lastly, the 6.0 has slightly heavier counterweights on the crank, to offset those pistons. The end result is the LM7 comes out within 5 pounds of the LQ4. Around here, the 6.0L is only $300 more, but they're in short supply, you have to prepay the entire $800 to get on the waiting list. Screw that. Especially if you want forged pistons, just have the 4.8/5.3 block bored. I've already taken one 5.3 block to 4", no problem.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 11:21 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
last_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 74
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atilla the Fun View Post
Around here, the 6.0L is only $300 more, but they're in short supply, you have to prepay the entire $800 to get on the waiting list. Screw that. Especially if you want forged pistons, just have the 4.8/5.3 block bored. I've already taken one 5.3 block to 4", no problem.
"I've already taken one 5.3 block to 4", no problem." That was gonna be my next question! Very cool, so for my purposes the 5.3 would be better anyway cause im obviously going to bore it. Now, would it be better to play it safe and only take it up to 5.7 total displacement? And I am of the understanding that the '03 or above is the way to go.

Thanks again!
last_ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 01:53 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: lm7

Stopping at 3.903"-3.905", depending on pistons, is the smart move if you're trying for much more than about 500 HP, but going to 4" is proving safe making 492 HP @ 6300 rpm. Also stop at 3.905" if you're going to turbocharge, supercharge, run nitrous, or use it in a high-loasd application such as a work truck. Pre-'01 versions should be avoided. If you decide you want 4", have the cylinder walls sonic-checked first, to be sure they're thick enough. Pre'01 blocks need to be tested before trying for 3.898", and can NOT go to 4".
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Tags
1988, 53, 700r4, block, differences, engine, gen, liter, lm7, lq4, power, short, swap
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.