Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2009, 10:49 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 24
Car: 1988 rs
Engine: 327
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
intake manifold choice

Well, my first v8 swap happened to be very interesting. Basically, i got a non running 88 rs with the 305tbi. I also had an unknown sbc that was going in. Long story short, i learned a lot about cams, timing, intakes, exhaust, fuel systems, and carburetors. After many months of tweaking and wondering why it wasn't running right i finally found out all the specs to the motor.

3970010 block w/327 large journal forged crank, speedpro forged dome top pistons, 462 camel hump heads, ported w/ 2.02/1.60 stainless, weiand single plane with 3/4" raised plenum, 650 holley dp, t-5 w/ 4.10's. Cam is a crane cams mechanical flat tappet #111411 292/300 adv. dur, 256/264 dur @ .050, .545/.563 lift, 105 LSA.

I removed the ecu, wires, sensors, a/c condenser. I put in an all new fuel system and dual 2.5" exhuast w/ headers, magnaflow mufflers and no cats.

I've had a hell of a time getting it to idle right, and to be street friendly. freaking hell.

Which brings us to my main question: What difference will i see switching to an Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap?? A bunch of forums say that it is good for all around power, but how will it do with a cam who's operating power band is 4200-7200??? And how about a top end?? i have become quite used to taking it to 7000rpm just because it sounds good and it has ridiculous power.

-Josh
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
1988 Camaro RS. Color - Faded blue. 19 years old, daily driver to work and school. Runs like a champ... 80% of the time.

Last edited by 327sleeper88; 09-28-2009 at 11:26 PM.
327sleeper88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 09-29-2009, 02:23 AM   #2
Member
 
Camarslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 104
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 305 HO, 408 under construction
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Camarslow
Re: intake manifold choice

Welcome to the forums.

I checked Edelbrock's website, it says that the Performer RPM Air Gap is supposed to make power between 1500-6500 rpm, however iirc from people writing in to chevy magazines I read, those ratings are for a 350 c.i.d. engine (someone chime in if I'm wrong). If I'm correct that intake should probably rev to 7000 when installed on your 327.
__________________
Chuck Norris, he doesn't sleep, he just waits.
Camarslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 03:54 PM   #3
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 33,342
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: 86 LG4-> ZZ3(LS1)/mild 396
Transmission: TH700(T56)/TH400
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt 3.23(4.10)/8.2" 10-bolt4.11

Classifieds Rating: (3)
The Performer RPM's powerband is a function of the runner length, so being on a smaller engine won't make it rev any higher (unlike a camshaft - but even then, it wouldn't be a 500 RPM difference, maybe 100 RPMs).

Bottom line is there isn't an intake out there that will make that engine street-friendly. The cam is the reason for that. Not that you couldn't drive it on the street, but the power will always come in at a high RPM.

A Victor Jr. is the right intake for that cam. If you want it to be more street friendly, put in a smaller cam and then install the Performer RPM.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:21 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 24
Car: 1988 rs
Engine: 327
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: intake manifold choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
The Performer RPM's powerband is a function of the runner length, so being on a smaller engine won't make it rev any higher (unlike a camshaft - but even then, it wouldn't be a 500 RPM difference, maybe 100 RPMs).

Bottom line is there isn't an intake out there that will make that engine street-friendly. The cam is the reason for that. Not that you couldn't drive it on the street, but the power will always come in at a high RPM.

A Victor Jr. is the right intake for that cam. If you want it to be more street friendly, put in a smaller cam and then install the Performer RPM.
The current intake i have is a weiand single plane, but just not with the space underneath (like the victor jr.). I was looking at the rpm air gap so i could increase manifold vacuum at idle by a little.
327sleeper88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 02:35 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 24
Car: 1988 rs
Engine: 327
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Carb jetting with different manifold.

If i change to the performer rpm air gap, will i need to re-jet my carb? It is currently a holley 650dp #4777-c, jetted 70-70, w/#28 shooters(but really sould be #35).

Is there a general rule from going from a single plane to a dual plane??

Advice much appreciated!

thanks, Josh
__________________
1988 Camaro RS. Color - Faded blue. 19 years old, daily driver to work and school. Runs like a champ... 80% of the time.
327sleeper88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 12:12 PM   #6
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 33,342
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: 86 LG4-> ZZ3(LS1)/mild 396
Transmission: TH700(T56)/TH400
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt 3.23(4.10)/8.2" 10-bolt4.11

Classifieds Rating: (3)
I wouldn't say there is a general rule, but plan on adjustments and possible rejetting.

The dual plane intake won't have a significant effect on your idle vacuum. It's the cam that is causing low idle vacuum, not the intake.

The carb is jetted 70/70? Does that mean no primary power valve, or both primary and secondary power valve? Either way, it doesn't sound right. You shouldn't need 35 squirters, either.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 12:48 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 24
Car: 1988 rs
Engine: 327
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/4.10's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: intake manifold choice

yup, 70-70 with a 2.0 power valve in the main system. I check my plugs quite often, and the have a nice tan color to them. With the #28 shooters, it would stumble of the line. i just got #35 shooters and a pump cam kit.

Wouldn't the performer rpm air gap add a little more low and mid range torque?
__________________
1988 Camaro RS. Color - Faded blue. 19 years old, daily driver to work and school. Runs like a champ... 80% of the time.
327sleeper88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Tags
327, band, camel, edelbrock, headers, high, holley, idle, manifold, olds, performer, pictures, power, ratings, returning, rev, rpm
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.