Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2009, 04:58 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
stoning_volcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 569
Car: 98 Camaro Z28
Engine: 346 LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:43

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to stoning_volcom
Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

I am looking to rebuild a motor, and when it is all ready prep the car then drop the motor in, but i am having a hard time figuring out whether to go with hydralic flat tappet? or hydralic roller? I guess what i am asking is what are the pros? and what are the cons? what is good bout them and what is bad? what power range are they more effective at? any help would be appreciated. It is a tuned port injection motor ill be building i want at least 390-450 horses post links do whatever just help me get out of this decision
__________________

THIS AINT NO HONDA!!

90 FORMULA LS1/4L60E under the cutter!
stoning_volcom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 12:16 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pensacola, Fl
Posts: 76
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Roller cams are far superior because they increase angle (steepness) the closing and opening ramps that have to be ground into a flat tappet cam to prevent lifter’s from jamming up in the first place. Roller lifters can take a steep ramp because of their wheel design. Once a valve reaches 0.300″ of lift (valve lift, not cam lift) it is less restrictive to air flow. So the intent is to get the valve to max list ASAP so that it can be less restrictive. This increase air flow, which in turn increases power and economy. VVT systems take advantage of what we learned by using roller cams. A roller cam’s duration is measured at the same points as a flat tappet cam. SAE standards start duration measurement at 0.006″ of lift. Whereas racing cams often start the duration measurement at 0.050″ of lift. If you compare the two cams in the picture above they have approximately the same duration. Duration is technically defined as the amount of time the valve is open (just time, not airflow, lift, etc.). So with equal lift and duration the roller will still make more power because of the steeper angles.




Seeing as your car is an 89 it's already a roller don't go backwards and put in a flat tappet unless your on a serious budget.

Last edited by jmat2407; 11-21-2009 at 12:38 PM.
jmat2407 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 01:08 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
stoning_volcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 569
Car: 98 Camaro Z28
Engine: 346 LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:43

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to stoning_volcom
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

well this is the situation i bought the car and it did have a roller 350 in it. I was a newb and didnt no i replaced headgaskets and all, a week after buying the car. A week after i got it running again the motor stalled and when i started it back up it was knockin pretty bad. So i got a 350 flat tappet for 575 with intake and everything so i did go backwards now i regret that decision and am tryin to find an easy way out but feel i should buy a roller motor and junk the other or sell
__________________

THIS AINT NO HONDA!!

90 FORMULA LS1/4L60E under the cutter!
stoning_volcom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 01:34 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
stoning_volcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 569
Car: 98 Camaro Z28
Engine: 346 LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:43

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to stoning_volcom
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

i got a ? for ya man. let say i wanted to put to top end of a 89 roller cam motor on my 85 oldstyle 350 would that work?
__________________

THIS AINT NO HONDA!!

90 FORMULA LS1/4L60E under the cutter!
stoning_volcom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 01:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 4,386
Car: 89 RS, 86 TA
Engine: 6.0 Trex, 5.3 cammed, both carbed
Transmission: T56 CFDFX, TH400 3000stall
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 3.23 gov

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

The top end as in heads? Yes, it will all swap out.


Roller or nothing for me, i refuse to use flat tappet. It is a PITA to have to break a FT cam in right and make sure you are using the oil with ZDDP that keeps them alive.

Z
__________________

Built Not Bought

www.fquick.com/zones89rs
ZONES89RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 03:58 PM   #6
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Not all roller lifters are the same. I just finished some work on a 350 Vortec engine and was looking at the lifters. The lifter design around the roller doesn't allow for a very aggressive ramp design. When buying a roller cam, make sure it will work with factory roller lifters or you'll need to buy better aftermarket lifters.

Roller lifters are very forgiving. You can pull them out and put them back on whatever lobe you want. Unlike a flat tappet lifter, they don't wear into any specific lobe.

You can buy used roller lifters or a used roller cam and mix and match components. You can put used rollers on a new roller cam etc.

If you buy a used flat tappet cam, you either need the exact lifters that were used and need to know which lobe they were on or you need to put new lifters on the cam. Used flat tappet lifters are garbage and should never be reused. New lifters on a used flat tappet cam will not hurt the cam.

Roller is just so much easier. Less wear, less friction, more aggressive ramp designs just make it a better choice.
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 02:14 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Way out west, long way south
Posts: 3,447
Car: 1990 Vette
Engine: 383 SP EFI 4bbl TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: 4 Link Coilover 9" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (13)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Quote:
Originally Posted by stoning_volcom View Post
So i got a 350 flat tappet for 575 ....so i did go backwards now i regret that decision and am tryin to find an easy way out but feel i should buy a roller motor and junk the other or sell
Is the flat tappet engine machined for roller lifters?
GM put flat tappet cams in a lot of roller blocks in the early '90's; mainly in trucks and vans. If so the roller cam is a easy swap using cheap factory parts.

To fit rollers into a early non roller block is relatively expensive because the retrofit rollers are $$$
vetteoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 03:04 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Ca[maro]88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 990
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 5.0 305 Carb'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

rollers are great if your pocket is deap enough. ive seen some veryyyy badass flat tappet motors though.
Ca[maro]88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 05:38 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 4,386
Car: 89 RS, 86 TA
Engine: 6.0 Trex, 5.3 cammed, both carbed
Transmission: T56 CFDFX, TH400 3000stall
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 3.23 gov

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Well, this one is priced right, was 149$ but just went up with the trash obama...i mean economy...

http://competitionproducts.com/prodi...p?number=E1135
__________________

Built Not Bought

www.fquick.com/zones89rs
ZONES89RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 07:18 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Flat tappets are so out dated that oil manufacturers aren't even making lube to support them anymore.
SeanW is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 09:06 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
SiCkRs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 2,033
Car: 91 RS &91Z28
Engine: 305tbi &305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4 2500TCI stall &700r4 stock
Axle/Gears: 2.73 &3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZONES89RS View Post
Well, this one is priced right, was 149$ but just went up with the trash obama...i mean economy...

http://competitionproducts.com/prodi...p?number=E1135
Would that cam work with stock roller lifters
SiCkRs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 11:30 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
stoning_volcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 569
Car: 98 Camaro Z28
Engine: 346 LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:43

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to stoning_volcom
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

I love it when people come into forums and talk **** bout flat tappet. GM made it and they have made some great numbers and got used where we are at today in cam and valve train tech so if you were to take that huge year span where the flat tappet rained and saying that is a waste you can go **** youself cause they make great numbers, IF you no what your looking for and know what you are doin that is all thank you guys for the answers i appreciate it and they are TONS of companies that make lube like everyone of them so no your **** befor you talk it **** thanks
stoning_volcom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 11:49 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Quote:
Originally Posted by stoning_volcom View Post
I love it when people come into forums and talk **** bout flat tappet. GM made it and they have made some great numbers and got used where we are at today in cam and valve train tech so if you were to take that huge year span where the flat tappet rained and saying that is a waste you can go **** youself cause they make great numbers, IF you no what your looking for and know what you are doin that is all thank you guys for the answers i appreciate it and they are TONS of companies that make lube like everyone of them so no your **** befor you talk it **** thanks

I dont really see anyone trashing flat tappet so i will assume this is directed at me. You might have been a newb to the world of mechanics when you joined this board, i am not.

Flat tappets can make great power. I personally put a new cam and lifter kit in my 350 just this year from comp cams and it works great for my app. But that doesn't change the fact that oil companies aren't putting enough zinc in their oil anymore to support a flat tappet cam. That is just a fact. Comp cams now reccomends using a bottle of break in lube every oil change or thier new oil or any speciality oil like Joe Gibbs that is specifically desiged for use with flat tappet cams.
If you want to use off the shelf oil you are going to be using a diesel lube.
SeanW is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 12:01 AM   #14
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,627
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Quote:
I love it when people come into forums and talk **** bout flat tappet. GM made it and they have made some great numbers and got used where we are at today in cam and valve train tech so if you were to take that huge year span where the flat tappet rained and saying that is a waste you can go **** youself cause they make great numbers, IF you no what your looking for and know what you are doin that is all thank you guys for the answers i appreciate it and they are TONS of companies that make lube like everyone of them so no your **** befor you talk it **** thanks
I dont think anyone is trash talking flat tappets but roller technology is much better or else they wouldnt continue to use it.
__________________

1989 Twin Turbo IROC-Z
"Twin Turbo 401 Buildup Pics "
"FQuick Garage"
9.86 at 141 mph 14psi, pump gas street tune
Orr89RocZ is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 07:24 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
jaykar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Prescott Valley AZ
Posts: 536
Car: 87 Iroc Showcar - Saturday Nite Hun
Engine: 383 4-Bolt Truck Hyd Roller MiniRam
Transmission: B&M 700R4 - Edge 3200
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt-TA Cover & Stud Kit - 3.2

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Flat tappet vs Roller ( which one is better )

Nobody's even mentioned Nascar and what there using at 850+ hp
and pushing 9800 at some tracks for up to 600 miles and on it


Later
__________________
Irocing

Last edited by jaykar; 11-28-2009 at 07:31 PM.
jaykar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 07:24 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap

Tags
block, cam, car, design, flat, gm, horsepower, it, lifters, power, ramp, roller, tappet, tpi, vrs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details