Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Exhaust
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-07-2005, 02:04 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
onebad82z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orange County,NY
Posts: 2,096
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Which is quieter?

On a single 3" in/out setup.Which will be quieter?I know the flow ratings..just worried about sound level!


Dynomax Ultra Flow welded #17233 with a 20" case length (Glass-wrap perforated tube)

or

Hooker Areo Chamber #21505 with a 14" case length (Chambered)

Case length says Dynomax to me..but...any real world experiences?
onebad82z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 06:54 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 924
Car: '92 RS, '84 Z28
Engine: 383, L69
Transmission: T56, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to deepstage69 Send a message via Yahoo to deepstage69
Check my sig, for a dynomax ultra flo, i think its 17220 not sure right off, 3 inch center in and out, its the 14 inch case tho.
__________________
92' 383 11:1 Trick flow 195 heads, custom BRE roller cam, Weiand Stealth Air strike manifold, 750 Mech sec speed demon T56 mcleod clutch Headman Lontubes dual 3" into 20" long Powersticks

'84 LT1 Swap and 4th gen dash

My cardomain site

Videos
deepstage69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 08:49 PM   #3
Supporter/Moderator
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,233
Car: '90 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to ShiftyCapone
Re: Which is quieter?

Quote:
Originally posted by onebad82z
(Glass-wrap perforated tube)
If you are looking at their bullet muffler than the Dynomax will be tremendously louder than the aerochamber.
ShiftyCapone is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 11:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,002
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild

Classifieds Rating: (0)
http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthre...hreadid=318789
go there for hooker

quiet at idle, but good and loud at WOT
Rabbitt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2005, 08:59 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
onebad82z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orange County,NY
Posts: 2,096
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: Re: Which is quieter?

Quote:
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
If you are looking at their bullet muffler than the Dynomax will be tremendously louder than the aerochamber.
Looking into the oval cased ultra flo series.That is the description of the internal construction.No bullets.
onebad82z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2005, 10:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,218
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5200 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.22

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to stage20
ive had every muffler made on my car and the dynomax stil rocks!
the oval dynomax will take care of you.
the hooker is just a tad louder, IMO, but either is a good choice.
the dynomax will have less interior noise.
the bigger it is, the more noise its gonna eat up.
go as big as will fit your application.
stage20 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 08:59 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
onebad82z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orange County,NY
Posts: 2,096
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (6)
That's my plan..bigger is quieter.But it seems to be near a 50/50 split for either muffler.I am leaning towards the Dynomax.

On another note...do you have any pics of you current motor setup?I am looking into a carb LS1 swap.
onebad82z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 04:18 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,218
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5200 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.22

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to stage20
Quote:
Originally posted by onebad82z
That's my plan..bigger is quieter.But it seems to be near a 50/50 split for either muffler.I am leaning towards the Dynomax.

On another note...do you have any pics of you current motor setup?I am looking into a carb LS1 swap.
http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthre...hreadid=301040
there is a pic of the engine in that thread.
stage20 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:54 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
onebad82z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orange County,NY
Posts: 2,096
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Any other recommendations on which one to go with that will be quieter?

Seems to be a 50/50 split.
onebad82z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 06:57 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,218
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5200 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.22

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to stage20
i just took off a single in and out dynomax 3" for the single in dual out 3".
the dual out has a lil less noise under acceleration, WOT, and at idle.

lil more raspy when you let off the gas from acceleration.

i give the dual out thumbs up over the single out, tho it doesnt flow the cfm the single out does, i doubt its hurting any power.
stage20 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 08:14 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,322
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
In a word. Dynomax.
1989GTATransAm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 08:12 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
onebad82z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orange County,NY
Posts: 2,096
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: Which is quieter?

Back from the dead...

So I finally swapped and went with the Hooker Areo Chamber #21512 with a 22" case length (Chambered). Nice rumble at idle, absolutely no more "tinniness" to the sound and overall just sounds more "muscle" even for a single 3". I have mp3's of before and after, but how do I post them here?
onebad82z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 08:12 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Exhaust

Tags
17233, case, chambered, dynomax, glasswrap, perforated, quiet, split, tube, ultraflow
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details