Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
ExhaustPost your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Here's a few pics snapped while fabbing the side exhaust (the morning I was leaving for the NFME event at Indy Raceway Park last May). It took about 3 hours...
I started with a take-off NASCAR exhaust from Muscle Motorparts in Huntersville, NC.
Next I raised the exhaust to the floorboards with the motorcycle jack, and clamped it in place
There was a lot of cutting involved, but I wanted to save as many good pieces as possible. Measure twice, cut once!
Tack welding the cut sections together. I clamped it to a bar, to ensure the parts were aligned.
I'd tack on one section, test fit, and then cut the next section.
Completed exhaust. It's not too obnoxious without a muffler, since the turbos quiet things down very well, but is loud for the street (fiance covers her ears whenever I downshift, he he he). Over the winter, I'll remove the 3.5" y-pipe, and run the drivers side to the other outlet, and probably run a pair of 3" mufflers. It was easier to leave the second exit in place for now, to keep the alignment.
Underside view. The ovalized piping really helps the ground clearance.
Side 1
Side 2
Plenty of ground clearance with the ovalized pipe.
This ad is not displayed to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Two more pics (let me know if I should remove them, since it's 2 over the 10 limit. They're hosted on my site...)
Plenty of ground clearance.
Lime Rock Park had an 83 dBa sound rule, and I was concerned about passing it. Dave Zug and Mike Davis helped fab this baffle that was tack welded to the exhaust. It aimed the sound at the pavement, and it worked like a charm. Stuffing the exhaust with steel wool was our next temporary option, in case this didn't work.
Andris, that's sick!! Nice job. Now that I'm back in CT I'll have to look you up to see if that's something that will work for my combo. Can I ask how you plan on tackling the good ol emissions test CT has?
I'm not sure on the ride height - it's got 175 lb springs in the back and 950's up front with Ground Control weight adjustable spring perches. I'd say it's similar to the Eibach Pro-kits, as far as ride height, and not as low as the Sportlines. Rear tires are 315 35 R 17's or 275 40 R 17's depending which set of wheels is on there (street or race tires). I'll get some video & sound clips when I get some more dyno testing finished throughout this winter. I'm sure I'll need a good aux mic, as the video camera's microphone will probably start clipping with something this loud. I've got more pics at www.skulte.com/gallery (Z28tt and Misc) as well as some at my new blog page (www.skulte.com/z28tt).
Works great now. Thanks! Sounds great! You should do a drive-by video of it. For some reason, a video seems to have more "impact". Maybe it's just an audio/video thing.
I found the .drf dyno runs, but no idea what opens a .drf file, nor did a search reveal what could open a .drf file.
The dynojet viewer opens the .drf (dynojet run file). I'll edit the post to mention that.
It's the same 399 cubed AFR210 headed 236/230 on 113 cammed smallblock. Much of the sound clip was during the steady state tuning of the fuel map (you can hear the dyno load the engine near the end of the clip), so it's not the usual 4 second blasts on the dyno. I built it to have some street manners (some Dynomax Ultraflows will be added as well), so the cam/heads aren't too wild (AFR 210's & 236/230 cam). Power peaks around 5700 rpm, and on 4 psi, has over 400 ft-lbs from when the dyno run started at 2500 to 6000 rpm (drops to 300 ft-lbs at 6500). More boost will fix that.
This is just the first run and some steady state tuning off the street... I'll get the other runs done tonight, but it'll give a better idea of what the car sounds like.
Yea Andris, that’s exactly my point… very tame sounding for that much cam, and nothing much to quiet it down. I would expect more of a lope to the idle.
Interesting. Do you think that the fairly short power band is the result of the low boost and the engine will wind up higher with more boost or do you think something else is going on? I’ve been noticing that some turbocharged engines tend to make power at a lower rpm then you would otherwise expect, and I haven’t quite figured out a pattern to why some do and some don’t.
Yea Andris, that’s exactly my point… very tame sounding for that much cam, and nothing much to quiet it down. I would expect more of a lope to the idle.
Interesting. Do you think that the fairly short power band is the result of the low boost and the engine will wind up higher with more boost or do you think something else is going on? I’ve been noticing that some turbocharged engines tend to make power at a lower rpm then you would otherwise expect, and I haven’t quite figured out a pattern to why some do and some don’t.
I'm thinking the high rpm turbo engines either have big turbos that don't see full boost until higher rpms (masking volE with higher boost), or just have very free exhaust/turbos that let you run more of an NA grind cam. Do any of the runs you see have boost logged? Does the boost climb with rpm, or is it constant? I'd think dividing the power by pressure ratio at the rpm would show true VolE, to compare apples to apples.
I think in my case, the power starts dropping off significantly by 6000 rpms, but the torque is within 50 ft-lbs from 3500-5500 rpms, which to me is a pretty broad powerband (but just doesn't have the top end of an NA racing engine), and much easier to drive for autox/road racing. I think a bigger cam, solid lifters, bigger heads, tubular turbo manifolds, and bigger turbo would extend the usable power from a 6200 rpm shift point to another 1000 more rpms. The reason I didn't go that way is that the stress on the rotating assembly from a 6500 to 7500 redline is a huge increase, and I didn't want to go to lightweight pistons/rods/wristpins, which might not like the huge cylinder pressures from big boost. I thought a 6200 rpm big boost engine would be more reliable than a 7500 low boost engine that needs a valvetrain refresh every year, to make the same power (although, the appeal of a heads/cam LS1 & 200 lb weight savings on the nose is tough to resist!). If you have Engine Analyzer, try modeling a 500 hp NA engine, and then sticking a restrictive exhaust on it to see how the power curve changes - I bet most of the change will be at over 5000 rpm...
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Man, that's bad a%%! Finally, someone used boom tubes & posted pics & vids! Awesome job man. Quick question, off topic though....what's the name of the song at the end of the vid on google? Thanks!
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Sick...absolutely sick. Did I notice NY plates on the car? Curios on the street legalness (if that's a word) in CT? I'm going to have to stop by to check that car out.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Nice work....I fab'd something remotely similiar to that for a buddies 8 second pro street nova. Fabricated the oval piping and used a little different idea as to how you switch from the round outlet of the muffler to oval. I can't freekin load them as they are bitmap pics.....ahhhhhhhhhhhh
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
I like the side tips, but not the price.
Maybe I could take a piece of tubing, split it down the center into twp pieces, then use two pieces of flat steel to create an oval tip, to the width I wanted...Hmmmm....A 45 degree nend should get it out to the side pretty good, if I position it right.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Steve...your a star! The reason I did this is that the 4" exhaust couldn't go over the rear suspension and because of how low the car is, it couldn't come out the side. The solution was to cut off the outlet ends of the mufflers and weld on a new outlet that was 2 1/2" high X 7" wide and offset to the bottom of the muffler to clear the frame rails and rocker panels.Here's how I did an oval exhaust. I am a toolmaker (that helps alot) and ran my own Midas shop for 14 years so if you combine the two......... I took some 2 1/2" mandrel J bends and wire edm'd them in half. This gave me the two halves I needed for my oval pipe. I them cut the back end right off of the 4" flowmaster and used our water jet cutter to make some flanges the exhact same shape as the muffler. So now the outlet on the muffler is 2 1/2" high X 7" wide instead of 4" round. I welded one half of my waterjet flange (with tapped holes in it) to the end of the muffler I cut off. The other flange has clearnce holes for the tapped holes on the muffler. I then cut and tacked together the outside (rounded) shapes of the tailpipes. After the outline was correct I then cut pieces of 16 gauge flatstock to fit in between the two outside (rounded) shapes of the tailpipes. Four hours of tig welding later and some soft pad grinding wheels voila! Total about 18 hours of work between altering the mufflers and fab'ing and welding the tails. Out for ceramic coating and BAM....off to Cobo hall for the autorama! Yes I know not everyone has access to this type off machinery (the water jet is slick!) but if your in the Windsor Ontario Canada area and need an exhaust...look me up. Hope you like.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
LOL! That sounds fair! Yes I did cut the end plate right off. By cutting the end plates off I was able to make that cut on an angle so that when I welded on the new endcap it was alreading starting the "turn" towards the outside of the car. The flanges (4) I made are the exact same shape (4 1/4 x 8 if I remember right) as the muffler if your looking from the end. Its just a matter of sawing off the hole end cap, then welding on the "new and improved" end cap. If you look at the pic of the muffler/tailpipe assembled on the pick-up tailgate look to the right and you see a bit of what the ends of the muffler look like now. I made 4 flanges.....one gets welded to the muffler and one gets welded to the tailpipe. The muffler one has tapped holes so you can bolt the tailpipe on. This new hole in the endcap gives you your starting point for the oval pipe instead of having to transition from round to oval.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Since I have the Texas Speed & Performance Rumbler LS1 cat back, I'd hafta trabsition from the bullet-style muffler, to a wider oval. I could keep my muffler, no problem, just the transition would be harder.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Or what you could do is find a shop with a pipe bender and someone with some skills to operate it, then open up the outlet of that muffler (you would be surpised how far it will stretch) and squish it to get your "oval" shape. It would take a little messing around with some test pieces to see how much you need to open it to get the oval shape (just cut off little pieces of 2 1/2" pipe...that is the muffler size correct......and practice with those) you want but it can defenately be done. Once you have your oval starting point you can buy/fabricate your oval piping as you need it.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Killer work there Rob.
I’ve played with exactly the same idea, basically splitting a 3rd gen 3” intermediate pipe lengthwise and then adding a 2” section in the middle, but haven’t tried it because I just don’t see how I will keep things straight in 3 dimensions (your setup is basically flat)
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Thanks guys. Crossfire you are right. Once you start adding in the 3rd dimension it gets pretty complicated. I think in the case of the 3rd gen suspension you would be farther ahead to lower the mounting point for the panhard bar at the frame and just fab up a rear pipe out of 4". As I look at Stephens Texas Speed rear, since it is in multiple pieces you could probably split each piece one at a time but the final assembly would be tricky.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Nicer prices, but for a reason too...
"Note: All divided pipe and Boom Tubes are tac-welded only and require finish welding."
Fine for those of us that own our own welders, and can do it themselves. Others would still hafta incur more $$$ to take them somewhere, and have them finish welded. Either before, or during installation. Either way, more $$$.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
yeah i figured since you have to get it welded together anyway, you might as well go with the one that needs finish welding, but for those without a welder, the drgas ones would probly be the way to go.
Re: Fabbing the side exhaust with plenty of clearance (aka NASCAR Boom Tubes)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
Judgung by your pics, I guess only one of the outlets is functional, and the other tip is just there to provide looks?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andris
Over the winter, I'll remove the 3.5" y-pipe, and run the drivers side to the other outlet, and probably run a pair of 3" mufflers. It was easier to leave the second exit in place for now, to keep the alignment.
It's embarrassing having a "fake" tip on there, but for now, makes sense. I could cut it off, and then have to weld it back on again a few months later. I might, just to save a few lbs weight for now...