ExhaustPost your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
I know the pipe configuration makes adifference, but even with a true dual exhaust, the sbc just sounds different. I think it must be something about overlap, or exhaust port configuration....or something.
They came with factory headers and true dual exhaust with a h-pipe crossover. :/ Wish GM did stuff like that, at least on the GTA's, Formulas, and IROC's.
When you say mustang I assume you mean the 5.0's right? Well with the limited knowledge I have of them I can say that yes they do generally have a traditional dual exhaust, most of which are H-pipe from the factory. They also employ a different firing order, which there was a HO and a non-HO order. I believe they also have a shorter stroke than a Chevrolet 5 liter, all which might contribute to the smoother exhaust note your hearing.
Max,
EDIT: Just read the above, that kinda answered it. To the other question, I believe they have a 4/7 swap cam for the SBC. I read something about it giving less crankshaft deflection with notable gains in higher HP engines.
The two main factors are firing order and valve timing. Thats why LSx's have that weird sound... they have a unique firing order from almost everything else. Combustion chamber design plays into it too, but not as much as FO and valve timing does. The LT1 has all 3 doing for it, and thats why they sound so awesome.
I think the firing order was the key I was looking for. When doing a 4/7 swap cam, do you just switch the wires on the distributor? That sound like it might be a good idea...
I think the firing order was the key I was looking for. When doing a 4/7 swap cam, do you just switch the wires on the distributor? That sound like it might be a good idea...
It's not that easy. You will also need a special camshaft.
The two main factors are firing order and valve timing. Thats why LSx's have that weird sound... they have a unique firing order from almost everything else. Combustion chamber design plays into it too, but not as much as FO and valve timing does. The LT1 has all 3 doing for it, and thats why they sound so awesome.
I'm mainly replying to the above bold text. If you take the 351 and late-5.0L Ford firing order and renumber the cylinders like a Chevy, the firing order is 1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3. Which is the same as the Chevy Gen III and IV (LS-series) V-8s. Just a bit of trivia I came across on hotrod.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbird89
I think the firing order was the key I was looking for. When doing a 4/7 swap cam, do you just switch the wires on the distributor? That sound like it might be a good idea...
yep, new firing order becomes 1-8-7-3-6-5-4-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayar
It's not that easy. You will also need a special camshaft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbird89
When doing a 4/7 swap cam
...............................That's what he said
Last edited by tazextreme3; 11-17-2008 at 02:53 PM.
Just to add to everything else, induction is what really does it to me.
A fuel injected car always sounds domesticated to me. You can "louden" a fuel injected car, but it just sounds like a tame vehicle with a loud-speaker.
A carbed car (i'm not even thinking about bigger cams here yet), will always have a nicer growl to it. Even basic '80s chev trucks (small cam), will sounds nice, vs a cammed up FI mustang for example (1997 car year for example).
But a cammed up small block chev with a quadrajet? Oh boy, that sounds beautiful. A Q-jet's secondaries cracking open sounds pretty intimidating
you must have had a bunch of drinks cause neither one of those is even close to right!
gm:
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
ford:
8 4
7 3
6 2
5 1
Quote:
They also employ a different firing order, which there was a HO and a non-HO order.
be careful...the sbf's all had the same firing order...actually, all ford v8's had the same firing order, except for one of the 351's, i believe it was the 351M that was different...
actually my diagrams are right and my ford firing order wrong. #1 is on the opposite side of GM, gauranteed.... i am a ford technician(definetly not braggin just stating a fact).
15426378 is for the non h.o. 5.0 and 13726548 is the H.O. firing order(different cams)
while the gm order on gen I/II small blocks is 18436572.... gen III/IV hav a 4-7swap
im still not getting this though...
the firing order in a typical sbc is 1-8-4-3-5-6-7-2, which gives a definite pattern since the right bank is 1-3-5-7 and the left bank is 2-4-6-8.
however the ford order than you are posting makes no sense.
the engine would literally vibrate its self apart.
the banks are 1-2-3-4 and 5-6-7-8 respectively...
im still not getting this though...
the firing order in a typical sbc is 1-8-4-3-5-6-7-2, which gives a definite pattern since the right bank is 1-3-5-7 and the left bank is 2-4-6-8.
however the ford order than you are posting makes no sense.
the engine would literally vibrate its self apart.
the banks are 1-2-3-4 and 5-6-7-8 respectively...
im confused
GM # 1 is the front left(drivers)side Odd #'s on the left even on the right
Ford 1-4 is on the right(passenger) 5-8 on the left. It been posted before but it should look like this.
GM
8[ ]7
6[ ]5
4[ ]3
2[ ]1
ford
4[ ]8
3[ ]7
2[ ]6
1[ ]5
GM fireing order 18436572 Ford either 15426378 or 13726548
Ford 15426378 is identicle to GM 18436572. 13726548 looks to be both a 4-7 and 2-3 swap(in GM) if I am looking right.