Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Fabrication

Fabrication Custom fabrication ideas and concepts ranging from body kits, interior work, driveline tech, and much more.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2009, 07:56 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
debating weight issues

i am debating if i should get a 3rd gen camaro or bird- and sell my s13 project i was going to dump a small block in it but im not too sure now-.

stripped with me (im a whole buck 40 :P) and the v8 in it - it should weigh about 2650 wet(oh and including a cage).

im curious if stripped can i get the 3rd gen down to even close to this? using carbon fiber fiber glass rear window delete for a fiberglass hatch and strait glass-whatever- to get it down there.

if i can im going to ditch the s13 240sx projet and just get a 3rd gen it would be alot simpler.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
faytmorgan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 09-27-2009, 08:04 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 11,682
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 540 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

It will be very difficult to get a third gen race weight (car, driver, fuel, etc) down under 2800 pounds. Typically 2400 pound range means a tube chassis. There's a lot of sheet metal in a third gen.

My car is a totally stripped down race car. Even though I run a BBC and have a full cage, my race weight is just under 3100 pounds. The cage itself is over 200 pounds. The BBC with aluminum heads is roughly the same weight as an iron head SBC. All my windows are Lexan and my deck lid is a piece of aluminum. The hood is fiberglass. I have some fiberglass doors to install this winter which after replacing my stripped down steel doors, may strip off about 50-70 more pounds.
__________________
87 IROC-Z
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.348@144.71
Stephen 87 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 08:29 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

thats exactly what i needed to know thanx alot!

i guess im staying with teh 240 then bleh- more work ahead- gehy
faytmorgan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 08:45 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 940
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

dont get me wrong, it can be done!
its just hard.
the thing to remember however is that a 2600 lb 240 will be slower than a 3100 lb thirdgen.
in a thirdgen, you not only have the room for a big engine, but it will generally handle better and go faster in a straight line than a 240

if you swap a 350 into a 240 expect a lot of headache and very very cramped quarters.
i imagine that it would throw the weight bias off pretty bad too, but i could be wrong

if you get a bird, get a notchback conversion to loose an easy 150 lbs off the back of the car.
then relocate everything you can as far back as you can to redistribute the weight bias.
if you are loaded (clearly not the case however) an LS1 will weigh less than a SBC and have more power.
the key is to use aluminum or fiberglass wherever possible.
then again, i am biased towards the camaro so im not really a fair judge

there are lots of threads about this BTW, do a search for weight reduction
__________________
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 995
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85 View Post
if you get a bird, get a notchback conversion to loose an easy 150 lbs off the back of the car.
The entire stock hatch and glass should only weigh about half to 2/3 of that, and a notch would only weigh slightly less.
It's almost as easy to get a Chevy with a notchback as it is a Pontiac, since the notchback TA's were made in '87 only, and only 6XX were made.
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:51 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 302
Car: 1991 camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85 View Post
dont get me wrong, it can be done!
its just hard.
the thing to remember however is that a 2600 lb 240 will be slower than a 3100 lb thirdgen.
in a thirdgen, you not only have the room for a big engine, but it will generally handle better and go faster in a straight line than a 240

if you swap a 350 into a 240 expect a lot of headache and very very cramped quarters.
i imagine that it would throw the weight bias off pretty bad too, but i could be wrong

if you get a bird, get a notchback conversion to loose an easy 150 lbs off the back of the car.
then relocate everything you can as far back as you can to redistribute the weight bias.
if you are loaded (clearly not the case however) an LS1 will weigh less than a SBC and have more power.
the key is to use aluminum or fiberglass wherever possible.
then again, i am biased towards the camaro so im not really a fair judge

there are lots of threads about this BTW, do a search for weight reduction
how in the world would it be slower? ls1 swaps in 240 are quite common nowadays
ellocojorge is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:04 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 940
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by ellocojorge View Post
how in the world would it be slower? ls1 swaps in 240 are quite common nowadays
I was comparing stock engine w/ mods in each car
an LS1 in a 240 would surely whip any typical thirdgen build
RED_DRAGON_85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:06 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 995
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85 View Post
I was comparing stock engine w/ mods in each car
But the OP said he was going to put a SBC in it... . I kept my mouth shut at first because I assumed you must have known something about 240's that I didn't... apparently not.
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 03:00 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,196
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Send a message via AIM to Stephen
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregsz-28 View Post
The entire stock hatch and glass should only weigh about half to 2/3 of that, and a notch would only weigh slightly less.
It's almost as easy to get a Chevy with a notchback as it is a Pontiac, since the notchback TA's were made in '87 only, and only 6XX were made.
But you can buy aftermarket Notchback hatches all day long nowadays.....
__________________

Custom powder coated flat black ROH Snypers w/the correct 3rd gen offset (no spacers needed, front or rear) Front--275/40R17s on 17"x9"--5" bs & custom widened & custom powder coated Rear--315/35R17s on 17"x11"--7" bs,
4th gen front seats, OEM 2001 TA rear wing, OEM 1997 TA side mirrors
TSP LS1 Cat-back exhaust-UMI Rod Ended STB-UMI Double Rod Ended On-car Adjustable PHB-UMI Performance Adjustable Control Arms with Off-Set Bushings - Ground Control Weight Jacks, Eibach Springs 9.5"-600lb/10"-150lb


To be Installed:
UMI Performance Tie Rod Adjusters-Kenny Brown Double Diamond SFCs

Home of the STS (Sequential Turn Signal) mod
Parting Out - 1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA


GOD Bless America
Stephen is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:26 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
BIG_MODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Detroit Suburbs
Posts: 319
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: Trickflow 350 Single Plane EFI
Transmission: Jerico
Axle/Gears: Aluminum 8.6 w/ T2R

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to BIG_MODS
Re: debating weight issues

3rd gen hatch complete (hinges, struts, rear flat panel, and spoiler) is 95 lbs. The only thing missing from that number is the plastic underneith, which might be 1 lb or so. Lexan and a replacement panel will save about 37-43 lbs depending if you use 1/8 or 3/16 lexan.

A heavily stripped road race thirdgen that I know of is in the 27-2800 lb range w/ out driver and it still has glass windshield and hatch and a GEN I SBC with aluminum heads.
__________________
www.f-bodysport.com
BIG_MODS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 02:35 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 995
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: debating weight issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
But you can buy aftermarket Notchback hatches all day long nowadays.....
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/ca...backhatch.aspx
gregsz-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Fabrication

Tags
240sx, 3rd, 4th, aluminum, bbc, bias, body, fbody, frontrear, gen, glass, race, reduction, strip, weight
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.