Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Fabrication
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Fabrication Custom fabrication ideas and concepts ranging from body kits, interior work, driveline tech, and much more.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2009, 09:12 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 27
Car: Restoring 85 IROC-Z, 89 5.0 notch
Engine: to be 383
Transmission: T-5 and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27in IROC and 3.55 in mustang

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thoughts on rear engine mod

I was playing Forza 3 and had the 900hp IROC going. Can't hook the thing up to save my life. Got me thinking what it would take to do a real life rear engine F body. Anyone have any ideas as to what it would take and what would be the most cost effective way of doing it.

I am thinking that it might involve a couple inch stretch of the area right behind the doors/roof but maybe not. There is allot of room width wise but not so much length wise, so maybe transverse? Maybe porche motor trans? I don't know of a transverse GM trans that would handle the power. 800 or so I would want.

I would want it slammed to the ground too. Am I or what? I tried a search but got nothing. Has anyone done this? Thoughts.

Ok found one but it starts going off on the Fieros not the F bodys that I want to mod.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/fa...e-iroc-gt.html (Mid-engine IROC-GT concept)
__________________
Red 85 IROC original owner ( in process of resto), Dark Blue 89 5.0 mustang notch currently around 350 rw NA hp.

Silver 02 Cadi Deville DHS (stock save the 15" sub w/775 RMS)

Last edited by flymikemc; 11-23-2009 at 09:49 PM.
flymikemc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:30 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

Quote:
Originally Posted by flymikemc View Post
what would be the most cost effective way of doing it.
sorry, but thats the funniest thing i've read recently and laughed hard.

Cool idea, i dont think any stretching would be needed, but the interior would have to stop behind the front seats. Transverse would be a squeeve but doable, seen it done in a fiero with a v8 swap.

The issue now would be that all of the weight would be on the rear of the car, now the front end is really light.

Im sure it can be done, but the amount of work involved is absurd.
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:54 PM   #3
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

Not too many OEM transaxles can handle that kind of power. A mid engine conversion is like any other mid engine conversion. It just takes lots of time and planning. Rear engine puts the engine and weight back to far. It would need to be a mid engine conversion with the engine still in front of the axle centerline.

The old Corvair cars were always good candidates for a V8 swap. The original kits put a SBC in the back seat. This required some sort of divider between the driver and the engine if nothing more than to reduce the noise and heat. I've seen a couple of SBC conversions but the best one I saw was actually a local car.

Late 60's Corvair had a 455 Olds Toronado engine and transaxle all behind the rear seat. Looking into the car, you would never guess what the powerplant was other than the exhaust headers poking out the rear.

Another local has a Fiero. The common swap was to put a V6 into the 4 cylinder versions. I don't know how many V8 swaps were done but I'm sure there are a few. The local Fiero is an ultimate swap. He has a SBC with a 671 blower sitting in the rear. It's not transverse mounted and a scoop pokes above the roofline. He originally tried a Toronado and an Eldorado transaxle but both were not strong enough. Eventually modified the Eldorado transaxle to a custom made gear drive system. His custom made gears for the transaxle are worth $10,000 but he'll never break them. His Fiero has the capabilities or running low 9's but he detunes it to run mid 10's and it's still street legal.

Back in the late 70's or early 80's, I think it was in Hot Rod magazine, there was a daily driver Olds 442 with an engine in the back seat.

The mid engine conversion with any kind of powertrain system isn't impossible but it's never a cost effective conversion. It's something you would do to show it can be done with no regard to the cost.
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:58 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 917
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

This has been on my short list for a few years, right after winning powerball.

It would be awesome to have a chromed up BBC with velocity stacks sitting under the rear hatch. You wouldn't have to pop the hood at car shows! haha.
My thoughts also include twin turbos and all wheel drive, a carbon fiber chassis, ZR1 brakes and a street weight under 3000 lbs.

As said, firewall behind the seats, then a scoop on the roof or sail panels for engine air. Radiator routing would be interesting. The suspension would need to handle all the weight back there. Rig a tank up front under the hood. Wiring....
Yeah, you would be fabricating a nearly 100% custom car to hang some Camaro parts on. It would be badass, but I really think the labor alone would cost $20,000 or more.
__________________

Any idiot can make a fast v8. It takes a real idiot to make a fast v6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Project 3.4 Camaro View Post
The only thing it will make go fast is your $.
jensen73110 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:21 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 230
Car: 1985 trans am
Engine: 1969 chevy 350 .060 over
Transmission: 5spd

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

hey, if anyone ever does this let me know, i wana see. haha
bakes85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 01:39 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 27
Car: Restoring 85 IROC-Z, 89 5.0 notch
Engine: to be 383
Transmission: T-5 and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27in IROC and 3.55 in mustang

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

Yea there is no doubt that allot of labor and fabricating would be needed. I guess I would have to beef up on my welding techniques. All it is now is me dreaming of what it could be like and what it would take. I agree that there are no factory setups that could handle the power. The only thing that I think might work would be a Porsche aftermarket trans and engine but I would want to put some sort of BBC in it. Or a 400 sbc twin turbo combo.

It would obviously be a independent rear and would require back halving the car. Basically removing everything from the rear seat pan back except for the rear fenders and glass etc. All custom tube framing etc.

Under the hood you could seal it up and make it half gas tank area and half trunk.

I have a feeling some type of farm equipment might be involved to beef up that rear up.
flymikemc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 05:24 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
FueledSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The state of hockey
Posts: 1,646

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

Heres a good place to start reading

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 9, Part 10, Part 12
FueledSoul is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 10:28 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 27
Car: Restoring 85 IROC-Z, 89 5.0 notch
Engine: to be 383
Transmission: T-5 and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27in IROC and 3.55 in mustang

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

Well, thats bad ***. Thanks. I wonder what one of those trans go for?
flymikemc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 11:04 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 230
Car: 1985 trans am
Engine: 1969 chevy 350 .060 over
Transmission: 5spd

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

i was reading some of that, pretty amazing ****
bakes85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 02:00 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,093
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

I always wanted to do an AWD firebird.... maybe I wouldn't get stuck in an inch of snow? Trouble is, on the V8 cars, there is just no room for the front driveline... maybe a turbo v6 car?
ploegi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 02:24 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 34
Car: 89 Bandit, 88 formula, 87 Trans Am
Engine: 305 ho, 355, 305
Transmission: 700r4, th350 (2000stall), 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.73, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 89Limited
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

should be able to use a northstar v8. a guy on another forum i kno put one in a cavalier. it is still fwd and it drives and runs, traction sucks, but its a v8 in a cavy. ill post some pics if i can still digg them up
89Limited is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 02:37 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 34
Car: 89 Bandit, 88 formula, 87 Trans Am
Engine: 305 ho, 355, 305
Transmission: 700r4, th350 (2000stall), 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.73, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 89Limited
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

found them.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HPIM3363.jpg (171.6 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7454A_3_1_2.jpg (109.8 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg HPIM3361.jpg (103.9 KB, 59 views)
89Limited is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 08:07 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 230
Car: 1985 trans am
Engine: 1969 chevy 350 .060 over
Transmission: 5spd

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

guys, just had an idea, on the cover of the january issue of hotrod mag, theres a 4 cylinder car that makes 1000 horsepower, put and engine like that in the back seat of a third gen, it will have loads of power, pretty light, and have good weight distribution
__________________
cars were made to go fast, so why do they have speed limits?
bakes85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 02:02 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 27
Car: Restoring 85 IROC-Z, 89 5.0 notch
Engine: to be 383
Transmission: T-5 and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27in IROC and 3.55 in mustang

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Thoughts on rear engine mod

I would think a four banger with that kind of power would not be very tame. Heck its hard to make any small block get over 650 and still be nice to you on the street. Good Idea though.

I think a big block would be the way to go. Gobs of torque and still have good manners on the street. One could could easily make 800 hp with it with a SC or turbo and still purr like a kitten.

At this point I believe the transmission would be the most expensive part of the whole deal. But it looks more doable than than what it took to get that corvette above done since you have more room behind the driver.
flymikemc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 02:02 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Fabrication

Tags
50, 89, axles, camaros, conversion, eldorado, engine, fiero, generation, length, mid, mods, motor, toronado, tranny, trans
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details