Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2009, 08:53 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Is this true?!

Hey guys, I posted up a video on Youtube of my 91 T/A 'vert about a month ago and just today I received this comment on it:

"Big Help about the (1 out of 555) what GM doesnt tell you is that there where really only 400 made the other 150 of them had extream computer problem so they where trashed. So thats a big head up for you . and i own a 1992 Pontiac Firebird 'vert and they only made 250 of them because it was the last year of the f-body firebird. and between 90-92 there where only 823 Pontiac Firebird Convertibles Made, very rare cars. very hard to find so keep hole of it. -Thanks"

Is that true? If so... anyone wanna trade their Turbo Trans Am?

Here's a linky to my video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_p7rvYcg7k
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 12:48 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Iroctopless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killam, AB
Posts: 1,669
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
. . . and i own a 1992 Pontiac Firebird . . . because it was the last year of the f-body firebird.
Wrong. That F-body platform was used by GM (Pontiac) from 1967 all the way too 2002. They made F-body Firebirds during the 4th generation ('93-'02).

And yes, there were a documented 555 '91 T/A verts built. Were only 400 actually released and the rest trashed? Never heard that one before, but even if I had, unless there's some kind of official documentation on this, it means nothing with regards too the increased rarity of it. I'd be very happy to discover it is documented.

Quote:
1992 Pontiac Firebird 'vert and they only made 250 of them because it was the last year of the f-body firebird. and between 90-92 there where only 823 Pontiac Firebird Convertibles Made, very rare cars.
Both statements in the above are also incorrect. Firebird convertible production in 1992 alone was 1,265! More than both of his numbers even put together.
Iroctopless is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 01:04 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
lasher_350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: El Dorado, KS
Posts: 286
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ??

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to lasher_350
Re: Is this true?!

that, and I wouldn't believe a word from anyone who can't spell. Seriously. R u guna bleev me when I say tht Pontica onlee mad wun firevurd? seriously.
__________________
lasher_350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 01:15 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Iroctopless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killam, AB
Posts: 1,669
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Iroctopless is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 01:34 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lasher_350 View Post
that, and I wouldn't believe a word from anyone who can't spell. Seriously. R u guna bleev me when I say tht Pontica onlee mad wun firevurd? seriously.
Hahaha good point. And I never really believed the guy. I know a bit about the thirdgens, and this is something I've never heard.
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 03:15 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Well I responded to his comment:
"Thanks for the complement, but I think your numbers are a little off. I never heard of any documentation saying that 150 T/A 'verts were trashed and well over 1,000 firebird convertibles were made in '92. They're still obviously pretty rare, but not THAT rare.

Thanks for the comment. "

And he wrote this back:
"No, believe me my uncle works for GM and he is the assistant to the GM head. it was a secret document and GM didnt want to let out that they had made a mistake with their computer systems and also a big problem with 91-92 was a bad clear coat in the paint that would peel only 6 months after the car came off of the line."

I don't totally doubt the thing about the clear-coat.
Do we have a conspiracy on our hands here?
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 03:39 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 2,991
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: '95 B-body LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via AIM to Thirdgen89GTA Send a message via Yahoo to Thirdgen89GTA
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan View Post
Well I responded to his comment:
"Thanks for the complement, but I think your numbers are a little off. I never heard of any documentation saying that 150 T/A 'verts were trashed and well over 1,000 firebird convertibles were made in '92. They're still obviously pretty rare, but not THAT rare.

Thanks for the comment. "

And he wrote this back:
"No, believe me my uncle works for GM and he is the assistant to the GM head. it was a secret document and GM didnt want to let out that they had made a mistake with their computer systems and also a big problem with 91-92 was a bad clear coat in the paint that would peel only 6 months after the car came off of the line."

I don't totally doubt the thing about the clear-coat.
Do we have a conspiracy on our hands here?
The peeling paint used to be an issue when they switched from oil based paint to water based paint to meet production plant emissions standards. That switch was done in 87 though, so it shouldn't be an issue for later years. It was covered under warranty if the paint delaminated from the body.

Yours just looks like typical peeling clearcoat like found in cars that have been left unprotected in the sun.
Thirdgen89GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 10:00 PM   #8
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 10,326
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: Is this true?!

The argument with the convertible wiring issue would be interesting indeed. The problem I have with it is there is 1) nothing I have ever heard of. 2) If it was a problem, why not include hard tops too? There is nothing unique about the vert wiring except for the tonneau release which is actually the same as the trunk release on a coupe... Right now it is not holding a bunch of water.

John
__________________
87 FORMULA - 5.1 LB9/A4 T-tops 3.73 Modified (Yellow/Black)
87 FORMULA - 5.0 LB9/M5 T-tops 3.45 (Yellow/Gray)
89 FORMULA 350 - CONVERTIBLE 3.27 All original (Red/Gray)
www.3rdgenformula.com
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 10:21 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by okfoz View Post
The argument with the convertible wiring issue would be interesting indeed. The problem I have with it is there is 1) nothing I have ever heard of. 2) If it was a problem, why not include hard tops too? There is nothing unique about the vert wiring except for the tonneau release which is actually the same as the trunk release on a coupe... Right now it is not holding a bunch of water.

John
I know! And wouldn't it be just silly for GM to trash 150 cars? Virtually anything electrical is repairable in a car.
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 08:19 AM   #10
Member
 
two-if-by-sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland's Eastern Shore
Posts: 156
Car: 1989 RS Vert
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA View Post
It was covered under warranty if the paint delaminated from the body.
I bought my '87 sport coupe in 1992. By 1994 there were spots of missing paint as large as a fist. Of course all the usual spots were affected - the rear deck, the roof, and especially the hood. I took the car to a body shop to see what my options were. The shop gave me a GM contact to call, and told me the paint was covered under warranty.

I still remember the conversation with the GM rep, his name was Mr Mudd. We argued for over an hour, but long-story-short the verdict was that if the car had over 75K miles, it would not be covered.

I knew someone else who did successfully have their car repainted around the same time; their car was an '86. It seemed like the blues were the worse.
two-if-by-sea is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 01:43 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,286
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/ 3.27s

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to JeremyNYR
Re: Is this true?!

"Hey, Uncle of the grammatically challenged, 150 of the cars sent to ASC for conversion all happen to have the same extream computer issue! Don't worry though, we will replace the computers and still sell the otherwise perfect vehicles for profit."
Fictitious Uncle: "NO!!!!! Draft a secret document and crush those cars, but count them in the production total... it's the only logical thing to do! Nobody will know until 18 years from now when my nephew tells the world in a comment on a crazy futuristic web site called You Tube... mmmmmuuuuhahahahha!!!"
JeremyNYR is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 03:00 PM   #12
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyNYR View Post
"Hey, Uncle of the grammatically challenged, 150 of the cars sent to ASC for conversion all happen to have the same extream computer issue! Don't worry though, we will replace the computers and still sell the otherwise perfect vehicles for profit."
Fictitious Uncle: "NO!!!!! Draft a secret document and crush those cars, but count them in the production total... it's the only logical thing to do! Nobody will know until 18 years from now when my nephew tells the world in a comment on a crazy futuristic web site called You Tube... mmmmmuuuuhahahahha!!!"
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:46 PM   #13
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 10,326
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by two-if-by-sea View Post
I bought my '87 sport coupe in 1992. By 1994 there were spots of missing paint as large as a fist. Of course all the usual spots were affected - the rear deck, the roof, and especially the hood. I took the car to a body shop to see what my options were. The shop gave me a GM contact to call, and told me the paint was covered under warranty.

I still remember the conversation with the GM rep, his name was Mr Mudd. We argued for over an hour, but long-story-short the verdict was that if the car had over 75K miles, it would not be covered.

I knew someone else who did successfully have their car repainted around the same time; their car was an '86. It seemed like the blues were the worse.
The problem with the paint in the 80's and 90's was GM, Ford and Chrysler all started using a new sealer, the nice thing about the sealer is it really reduced rust, the down side was it was expensive so in order to reduce costs they forwent the primer. The problem with Blues, Whites, Silvers, purples, etc is the fact that so little pigment was needed and so coverage was easily obtained, add to that the sealer was very UV sensitive. In the end the UV rays would go through the blues, silvers, whites etc and would attack the sealer and the paint would eventually flake off.. whereas yellows reds oranges etc tended to hold up slightly better, they just tend to fade, although it does happen to those colors as well on occasion.

John
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:49 PM   #14
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by two-if-by-sea View Post
I bought my '87 sport coupe in 1992. By 1994 there were spots of missing paint as large as a fist. Of course all the usual spots were affected - the rear deck, the roof, and especially the hood. I took the car to a body shop to see what my options were. The shop gave me a GM contact to call, and told me the paint was covered under warranty.

I still remember the conversation with the GM rep, his name was Mr Mudd. We argued for over an hour, but long-story-short the verdict was that if the car had over 75K miles, it would not be covered.

I knew someone else who did successfully have their car repainted around the same time; their car was an '86. It seemed like the blues were the worse.
If that was the verdict then how did you manage to argue for that long?
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 05:37 PM   #15
Member
 
two-if-by-sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland's Eastern Shore
Posts: 156
Car: 1989 RS Vert
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan View Post
If that was the verdict then how did you manage to argue for that long?
Start off nice, gradually get angrier to the point where I am yelling at him. I had nothing to lose and everything to gain. At least at first, I thought GM was gonna cover it. I got the "I feel your pain" speech, and the guy talked ALOT. Things went downhill quickly. Every time he tried to end the call, I started the "SO YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT I HAVE TO LIVE WITH YOUR DEFECTS" speil. I remember assuring the guy that I would never again buy a GM product for the rest of my life. He probably hears the same thing a dozen times per day. I just thought he would get sick of me and agree to cover the repaint.
two-if-by-sea is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 06:00 PM   #16
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by two-if-by-sea View Post
Start off nice, gradually get angrier to the point where I am yelling at him. I had nothing to lose and everything to gain. At least at first, I thought GM was gonna cover it. I got the "I feel your pain" speech, and the guy talked ALOT. Things went downhill quickly. Every time he tried to end the call, I started the "SO YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT I HAVE TO LIVE WITH YOUR DEFECTS" speil. I remember assuring the guy that I would never again buy a GM product for the rest of my life. He probably hears the same thing a dozen times per day. I just thought he would get sick of me and agree to cover the repaint.
Oh wow... I'm surprised that he didn't give in. They usually do after a spiel like that!
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 08:26 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
TOM-1LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 306
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 1LE
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: G92 Perf. Axle

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyNYR View Post
"Hey, Uncle of the grammatically challenged, 150 of the cars sent to ASC for conversion all happen to have the same extream computer issue! Don't worry though, we will replace the computers and still sell the otherwise perfect vehicles for profit."
Fictitious Uncle: "NO!!!!! Draft a secret document and crush those cars, but count them in the production total... it's the only logical thing to do! Nobody will know until 18 years from now when my nephew tells the world in a comment on a crazy futuristic web site called You Tube... mmmmmuuuuhahahahha!!!"
LOL. Classic.
__________________
Tom

1992 Z28 1LE, 305 TPI 5-speed
Radio delete, Red/Red leather
9,XXX original miles

Previously: 1996 T/A, 1999 T/A, 1999 Z28
TOM-1LE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 10:43 PM   #18
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Is this true?!

Update:
HAHAHA look at the private message that user sent me:
"the crazy non-scenc comment about GM that was my cousin who thinks he knows everything. truely very sorry. the only thing i know about my car is that its rare but not nearly that rare."

Go figure! XD
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 09:51 AM   #19
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 10,326
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: Is this true?!

IMHO, In the grand scheme of things... it is rare enough, with or without those extra cars...

John
__________________
87 FORMULA - 5.1 LB9/A4 T-tops 3.73 Modified (Yellow/Black)
87 FORMULA - 5.0 LB9/M5 T-tops 3.45 (Yellow/Gray)
89 FORMULA 350 - CONVERTIBLE 3.27 All original (Red/Gray)
www.3rdgenformula.com
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 07:54 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,286
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/ 3.27s

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to JeremyNYR
Re: Is this true?!

I'm glad some of you enjoyed my little spoof :-)
__________________
Bright Platinum Metallic with painted hoodbird, 17x9 Year One Snowflake Wheels, smoothed inner fenders, shaved door locks and antenna. Black leather interior.

Current Drivetrain: LT1 and T56 with SLP 1 3/4" primary headers and catback, Borg Warner 9-bolt.

Coming soon: rear gear swap!
JeremyNYR is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 07:54 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details