Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2009, 03:36 PM   #1
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

Hey guys, this is just a thought sitting in the back of my mind (for now) but I have a 1994 GMC Jimmy which I'm thinking of replacing with a mid to late 80's Camaro Sport coupe, Berlinetta, or LT (if i'm lucky) with a V6 MFI... 2.8 most likely, maybe 3.1. That along with a manual transmission. The Jimmy isn't exactly a gas guzzler but it's not the cheapest car to run. What do you guys think of that replacement? Do you think it's practical/more economical? Thanks!
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:41 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,631
Car: '91 TA vert; '11 Optima
Engine: LB9; 2.0 turbo
Transmission: slushbox/slushbox with paddles
Axle/Gears: 2.73/who knows

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

I just went on the EPA website and was really surprised to find these fuel mileage numbers:
Jimmy:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008c...f.jsp?id=11530

2.8 Camaro auto vs. manual:

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008car1tablef.jsp

The 4 speed auto gets better mileage than the 5 speed manual! How is that possible? And what kind of mileage do you guys get with your V6s?
musclecar70sfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:10 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 13
Car: 1991 Z28 Conv.
Engine: 5.0 V8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

If I found a Berlinetta and was able to afford it, I wouldn't be racking up miles on it, but that's just me. I don't have a V6 but I have two V8 305's.. one is in a truck and the other is in my Camaro. Truck = 17 mpg & Camaro = 22 mpg ... if I keep my foot out of it!
jshort0034 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 05:37 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,742

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Send a message via ICQ to AmorgetRS Send a message via AIM to AmorgetRS
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

My DD is a 89 V-6 hard top with the 2.8 and a 5 speed. I paid 850 bucks for it, it runs great. I had to put some money into it, but those where oddities (cluck spring went all sideways) but I discovered it had a rebuilt motor in it while I was replacing stuff. I am getting around 24 mpg average with it. I would suggest a 90-92 as they have better fuel injection with DFCO and other things that can help the gas mileage.
__________________
1982 | 1984 | 1986 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 2000
Android user? Download a free Thirdgen Vin decoder for your Android based device here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Reaper View Post
it kills performance similar to visualizing a picture of Rosey O'Donnell nude.
AmorgetRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 07:17 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

i get about 24mpg with my 92
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 11:03 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Posts: 438
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

I've been running my 2.8L/5-speed Firebird as a DD for the past 8 years. To add a little life to the car, I did a major build-up on the engine (425,000 km) last fall. I, at present, still get about 32-35 mpg on the highway. If I put good snowtires (Nokian) on all four corners and a little weight in the trunk, I'm as good as the 4X4's on the asphalt. Ask me about the white-out blizzard last January.

So, if you want a Thirdgen as a DD, then go for it. I also have two GTA's but the 305/5-speed is a little heavy in traffic and therefore not a good option. The lighter clutch pressure of the V-6 is much preferred in my opinion.
__________________
GTA50 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 08:13 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,318

Classifieds Rating: (14)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

I used a 91 Firebird with a 3.1L auto as a daily driver for about 4 years and it worked just fine. Every winter I'd go out and find a set of take off 15" tires from a midsize car, and it got through South Dakota winters without any traction problems. Gas mileage in town wasn't that impressive, but on the highway it was acceptable. I also had a 84 Camaro sport coupe with a 2.8/5spd for 6 months, and it was fine also. I'd probably hold out for a 305 if I were looking again, but there's nothing wrong with the V6 as long as you don't want to go fast. Not to mention the 6cyl parts are easier to find and much less expensive then V8s.
__________________
Drew
83 Camaro 5.0L *1995-98* RIP
84 Camaro 2.8L *2005-06* RIP
86 Trans Am WS6 5.7L Sold!
86 Mustang 2.3L Turbo
87 Iroc 5.7L
91 Formula 5.7L
91 Camaro RS convertible 5.0L
91 Firebird 3.1L *1999-06* Sold!
Drew is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 02:43 AM   #8
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: thinking of getting this a daily runner... your thoughts

Just watch when you have to merge onto busy streets with oncoming traffic. They have a difficult time getting out of their own way!
__________________
1987 CHEVROLET CAMARO IROC-Z28
-Red with Grey Custom Cloth, 1SC Interior Option Level 3, and T-Tops.
-350ci TPI 5.7 Liter L98, (225HP/330TQ) 700R4, Discs, BorgWarner 9-Bolt Posi with 3.27s, all G92 options included with B2L in 87. Shipping weight: 3,461lbs.
-Mods/Maintenance: TPiS airfoil, K&Ns, custom PROM chip, 160* stat, cut airbox, ACDelco RF spark plugs, MSD 8.5mm wires, MSD coil, TB coolant reroute, 3" CarSound/MagnaFlow high-flow converter, 3" I-pipe, Flowmaster 80 Series, 3" stainless tips, L35 2,200RPM TC, Spohn SFC's, BFG g-Force KDWs & Nitto DRs, 460 watt sound system with bass tube, otherwise, factory.
-The exact car I searched 4 1/2 years for! It still has original Van Nuys paint, all documentation, and 77,000 miles.
-G-Tech 0-60: 6.06sec with wheelspin. (KDW)



1989 CHEVROLET CAMARO RS
-Red with Grey Deluxe Leather Interior and T-Tops.
-173ci MPFI 2.8 Liter LB8, 700R4, 10-Bolt with 3.42s.
-Mods: K&N's and AR rims.
-First car and former daily driver with 140,000 miles.

IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 02:43 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Originality
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details