I just went back to a local kid who was holding a 1991 Camaro for me to buy and he says 'oh, my dad turned it in under the Cash for Clunkers Program.'!!!!!!!!!!!! He even had the audacity to smile at me while he said it!! I hope his new POS 4 door jellybean (that dropped in price 20% the moment he drove it off the lot) drains his wallet dry...

lolol well people see a deal and don't read the fine print lolol

By 'deal' do you mean cash for clunkers... or the chance to elect the Messiah?

I've seen people do worse before cash for clunkers. Next you'll tell me obama invented slavery, aids and fords.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/an....php?f=14&a=60

The title of your thread is just asking for a political debate, one that doesn't belong on this website as our posted rules quoted above state.

The flip side to your argument is that some Third Gens turned into the C4C program may not have been worth the amount the C4C program was offering. Ultimately, it's the owner's decision and most would do whatever option leads them to maximum return.

I'm neither for or against Obama or any political party as they all have faults.