History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Old 02-11-2012, 02:43 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
rarebmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 912
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 89 IROC/89 Vert/87 Vert/89 GTA Vert
Engine: 5.7/5.0/5.0/5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" 2.77/9" 3:23/9" 3:42
Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

I am curious about a couple items. I found a gut locally that was parting out a G92 optioned 89 IROC H/T - (no title and body was rough).
The G92 has 3:42 performance axle (mine is a standard 2:77)
The G92 also came with N10 Dual cat exhaust (13% HP gain?)
in addition also came with an oil cooler. This car also had the LE1 black aluminum soace saver spare tire with air canister. The front brakes seemed to be standard 10.5" brakes.

I did buy the rear end, dual cats and space saver spare to put into my 89.
I did not know where it is located or what the oil cooler looked like (he is keeping engine for a rock crawler). This car did have a/c and was not a 1LE but had parts that where part of the 1LE package. I know that this car would be decent to save but too rough for anyone and no title so I grabbed some of the hard to find parts.
Where is the oil cooler and what does it look like? Is is a direct bolt on? Am I hurting the value of my original car by adding these items or making it a little more desireable? I have not seen any post about the dual cat sustem anywhere on here by doing a search. Has anyone else added these items to their IROC and did it make a considerable upgrade?
Thanks in advance.

Last edited by rarebmx; 02-11-2012 at 02:52 PM.
Old 02-11-2012, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,685
Received 745 Likes on 505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Its all only worth what someone will pay for it. some like em stock some don't..
as long as you can swap it all back stock you will be fine..
Old 02-11-2012, 02:55 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
rarebmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 912
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 89 IROC/89 Vert/87 Vert/89 GTA Vert
Engine: 5.7/5.0/5.0/5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" 2.77/9" 3:23/9" 3:42
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Originally Posted by TTOP350
Its all only worth what someone will pay for it. some like em stock some don't..
as long as you can swap it all back stock you will be fine..
Still curious about the Oil cooler option

We are not selling anytime soon. I personally think time will tell on value. I will keep original parts more than likely but the factory performace options form the same year should help increase interest even though it is not factory. It might set mine apart a little bit from the "standard" 350 cars. I think a lot of people are not parting out G92 IROCs.
Old 02-11-2012, 03:03 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,685
Received 745 Likes on 505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

The oil cooler is sandwiched between the block and oil filter. has tubes running from there to the front of the pan then to the pass side frame rail. One line goes to the rad the other to the hard line bolted to the frame rail.

A quick search and you will find all the info you need.

My TPI 350/305spd formulas all came with thats stuff sooooo I guess Im just used to having all that stuff.
I also grab the factory performance parts when I can.
Old 02-11-2012, 03:54 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
rarebmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 912
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 89 IROC/89 Vert/87 Vert/89 GTA Vert
Engine: 5.7/5.0/5.0/5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" 2.77/9" 3:23/9" 3:42
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Okay thank you. I was just wonderig what else I could grab. For $250 I got dash pad, gauges, dual cats, tail lights, overhead console, comeplete rear end, hood vents, fog lights, space saver spare and all the hardwar eincluding jack, console and a few small parts. I could not pass it up - my issue is: did I leave anything I should have gotten behind? The only item I might go back and get is the hatch pull down. I think I coverd all preformance parts - it DID NOT have aluminum drive shaft or else I would have liked to have had it.

FOUND THIS FOR 1989 (my car)

1989
Chevrolet built 111 "1LE" 1989 Camaro's for the SCC A Showroom Stock racing series. But 1LE wasn't ordered like other RPOs. Ordering the RPO G80 Limited-slip rear axle & G92 performance axle with an IROC-Z Coupe triggered the 1LE RPO. Here's how it worked: When G92 was ordered, it forced several other options including engine oil cooler, 4-wheel disc brakes, dual converter exhaust and P245/50ZR16 tires. A 1989 Camaro with G92 had to have either the 350ci (RPO B2L) engine with 4-speed automatic transmission, or the 305ci (RPO LB9) with 5-speed manual. These Camaro's had 145 mph speedometers and 5500 rpm redline tachs. If RPO G92 was ordered with air conditioning, the cars were built as street vehicles. If air conditioning was not ordered, Chevrolet added 1LE equipment for the race series. This included aluminum drive shaft, big front brakes adapted from the Corvette, fuel tank baffles, specific front and rear shock absorbers, and different jounce bumpers. Also, fog lamps were deleted for weight savings and better air flow to the radiator.
Old 02-11-2012, 04:03 PM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Originally Posted by rarebmx
overhead console
Must be an addition as there were no overheads in 89. Regardless, it appears that you bought some nice parts.

JamesC

Last edited by JamesC; 02-11-2012 at 04:13 PM.
Old 02-11-2012, 04:06 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
rarebmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 912
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 89 IROC/89 Vert/87 Vert/89 GTA Vert
Engine: 5.7/5.0/5.0/5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" 2.77/9" 3:23/9" 3:42
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Originally Posted by JamesC
Must be an addition as there were no overheads in 89. Regardless, it appears that you made some nice parts.

JamesC
True, Last year was 87? I thought that too about the overhead (not going to use it in mine). I am going to switch in a clock into my console even though last year was 85 for it. I guess a little custom touch adds interest.
Old 02-16-2012, 05:47 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
rarebmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 912
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Car: 89 IROC/89 Vert/87 Vert/89 GTA Vert
Engine: 5.7/5.0/5.0/5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" 2.77/9" 3:23/9" 3:42
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

One more question and I cannot find it in a search. Are all G92 cars G80's? Meaning are all perfromace gear ratio optioned cars posi cars? I forgot to look this up on the RPO code of the car I pulled the axle out of. I did not do much investigating before I bought it but the car was all original and when I was truning the rearend today and counting my turns it almost seemed like a 3.00 rear end.

Found this thread but nothing about these options. This is a camaro...

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tran...-10-bolts.html

Last edited by rarebmx; 02-16-2012 at 05:56 PM.
Old 08-13-2012, 08:58 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
yo soy el warg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Check this out on the G92 Mystery.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/hist...2-mystery.html
Old 08-22-2015, 07:32 PM
  #10  
Member

 
neilcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pacific Grove CA
Posts: 206
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z convertible
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700R
Axle/Gears: 2:77
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

I am by no means any sort of expert on this topic. I've just been trying to sort it out too. I've got two 87 IROCs (one couple, one Conv) and both have GM3 (3:43 gears) G80 (Posi), G92 (Performance axle) and J65 (4 wheel disc). I also have a plain vanilla 88 convertible with almost zero performance features. So I've been trolling for a better rear end for that car. At first I thought that if I just found a G92 that I'd be all set!? Wrong! I found this car whose SPID sticker is seen here. This is an 86 IROCZ with LB9 and auto trans. Note that this car has GU5 (3:23 gears) and G92 but DOES NOT have G80 or J65.

So obviously G92 by itself is not the end all be all. It seems that it is nothing more than a gear set. If you want the whole enchilada you have to look for the G80 and J65 too. Anybody got one?

Old 06-30-2018, 08:56 AM
  #11  
Junior Member

 
camaro2172000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

neilcase. Mine has G80 and J65 KC4. but know G92.
Old 06-30-2018, 04:55 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (58)
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 20,309
Received 1,052 Likes on 748 Posts
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

I'm not sure why people have to make things so confusing... G92 means the car has an optional "performance" gear ratio. So if a car is available with two different ratios, the G92 option means it's the upgraded ratio.

If a car is only available with a standard gear ratio when ordered with a specific engine, or package, then there's only one gear ratio applicable and there's no need for the G92 code to differentiate between the gears.

Any other speculation of a "G92 package" is based on how the gear ratio often differentiates between a car with or without other performance options. It's a meaningless RPO in many cases, because it's more of an "if" or "when" code than anything absolute. It depends on other options that the car has. It's specifically related to the gear ratio, and the gear ratios have their own codes, so it's not even absolute for that case.
Old 06-30-2018, 05:10 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Originally Posted by Drew
I'm not sure why people have to make things so confusing... G92 means the car has an optional "performance" gear ratio. So if a car is available with two different ratios, the G92 option means it's the upgraded ratio.

If a car is only available with a standard gear ratio when ordered with a specific engine, or package, then there's only one gear ratio applicable and there's no need for the G92 code to differentiate between the gears.

Any other speculation of a "G92 package" is based on how the gear ratio often differentiates between a car with or without other performance options. It's a meaningless RPO in many cases, because it's more of an "if" or "when" code than anything absolute. It depends on other options that the car has. It's specifically related to the gear ratio, and the gear ratios have their own codes, so it's not even absolute for that case.
I think it gets confusing because initially it was simply a stand alone performance gear ratio, later it required certain equipment/powertrain combos before being able to order.
Old 08-18-2022, 11:17 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Crowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z 1LE
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option

Originally Posted by neilcase
I am by no means any sort of expert on this topic. I've just been trying to sort it out too. I've got two 87 IROCs (one couple, one Conv) and both have GM3 (3:43 gears) G80 (Posi), G92 (Performance axle) and J65 (4 wheel disc). I also have a plain vanilla 88 convertible with almost zero performance features. So I've been trolling for a better rear end for that car. At first I thought that if I just found a G92 that I'd be all set!? Wrong! I found this car whose SPID sticker is seen here. This is an 86 IROCZ with LB9 and auto trans. Note that this car has GU5 (3:23 gears) and G92 but DOES NOT have G80 or J65.

So obviously G92 by itself is not the end all be all. It seems that it is nothing more than a gear set. If you want the whole enchilada you have to look for the G80 and J65 too. Anybody got one?



I have an 89 Iroc, love to know more about it. I had dealer decode my rpo #. G92, GW6-3:27 Ratio and J65. I had to order gears and bearings from Australia as the borg Warner rear end was built there.

The 7th digit of the vin, DIV -1,2 PROD IN-US. ID LIKE TO KNOW IF THAT MEANS 1 of 2 produced in US? I’m in Canada
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
01-19-2024 04:55 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
01-10-2020 05:33 PM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
08-22-2015 08:00 PM
mustangman65_79
Interior
14
08-13-2015 07:36 AM
ZZ42Fast
TPI
4
08-10-2015 08:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Let's talk about Camaro G92 option



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.