Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Restoration

History / Restoration Got a question about Third Gen (1982-1992) Camaro or Firebird history? Where can I find these original parts? What is this option or RPO code? Those questions, answers, and more!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


View Poll Results: Which do you prefer rubber or plastic
Plastic 12 52.17%
Rubber 11 47.83%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-06-2009, 09:32 AM   #1
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,093

Classifieds Rating: (0)
82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Quick question for you guys. On the roof rails for the T-Top glass what do you prefer the plastic ones or the rubber ones?

As much input from everyone would be appreciated.We're working with one of our suppliers to reproduce these roof rails for you guys,as a good quality piece.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________

Tony
1A Auto Parts
1-866-403-3393
Check out our :Camaro Parts, Pontiac Parts
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 08-06-2009, 09:45 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
RPM WOT L 98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 868

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Tony, I'd have to say plastic. I replaced the stock rubber ones on my Formula a while back with the updated plastic ones and not only did they look better just because they were perfectly straight and not wavy after sitting in the sun, but also I think the longevity is better for the plastic ones.
The old rubber ones would "ooze" out of the ttop when the sun heated the glue up, I did not have that problem with the new ones.
Mark
__________________
1992 Trans Am "RARE 92" ----- Jamaica Yellow, L98, 147K, All Original CA car
1991 Trans Am GTA ------------*2,800 miles*--1st Place Stock, TA Nats 2009
1992 Trans Am "PMD 92" ------47K, Best of Show, ThirdGen Fest 2008
1989 Formula 350 "PMD 89" ....Sold....
Redline Performance Machines
RPM WOT L 98 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 09:57 AM   #3
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,093

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPM WOT L 98 View Post
Tony, I'd have to say plastic. I replaced the stock rubber ones on my Formula a while back with the updated plastic ones and not only did they look better just because they were perfectly straight and not wavy after sitting in the sun, but also I think the longevity is better for the plastic ones.
The old rubber ones would "ooze" out of the ttop when the sun heated the glue up, I did not have that problem with the new ones.
Mark
That's what Dan (1ADan) said to me.He also thought the plastic ones were better also because they didn't tear like the rubber ones tended to.

Keep posting guys, the more feedback on this one the better.
__________________

Tony
1A Auto Parts
1-866-403-3393
Check out our :Camaro Parts, Pontiac Parts
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2009, 10:02 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Posts: 210
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

From an accuracy standpoint, I would prefer the rubber.

I understand the longevity of the plastic and in fact that is what GM currently supplies as a replacement for the rubber, but I am in the middle of a ground-up restoration on one of my GTAs and my 1984 Trans Am is eligible for collector's status. So, for me original counts most.
GTA50 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 08:51 AM   #5
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,093

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTA50 View Post
From an accuracy standpoint, I would prefer the rubber.

I understand the longevity of the plastic and in fact that is what GM currently supplies as a replacement for the rubber, but I am in the middle of a ground-up restoration on one of my GTAs and my 1984 Trans Am is eligible for collector's status. So, for me original counts most.
I understand where you're coming from.
__________________

Tony
1A Auto Parts
1-866-403-3393
Check out our :Camaro Parts, Pontiac Parts
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 02:50 PM   #6
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Hoestly no one has ever noticed that my 87 had the plastic. I personally prefer the 91.5 - 92 plastic style because 1) they do not leak, 2) they look better, IMHO. 3) since it is the GM replacement, who is to argue that it is "Wrong"

One thing that I noticed is the GM original stuff that I got was awesome compared to the replacement OER stuff. the OER appears to be getting better, but at first it was real crap. The GM seal was so much nicer and cleaner fit and finish.



John
__________________
87 FORMULA - 5.1 LB9/A4 T-tops 3.73 Modified (Yellow/Black)
87 FORMULA - 5.0 LB9/M5 T-tops 3.45 (Yellow/Gray)
89 FORMULA 350 - CONVERTIBLE 3.27 All original (Red/Gray)
www.3rdgenformula.com
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 03:40 PM   #7
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,093

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Thank you John for taking the time to reply. More feedback would be great.So far 119 views and 9 poll responses.
__________________

Tony
1A Auto Parts
1-866-403-3393
Check out our :Camaro Parts, Pontiac Parts
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 12:30 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
K-slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 259
Car: 91' Firebird
Engine: 3.1 LH0 V6
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to K-slice
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

I REALLY wish I had the plastic. after time the rubber ones slide out from under the glass in back and they are impossable to push back in, then they rip and you gotta cut them, just a pain.
__________________
'91 Firebird 3.1
Gives me something to work on.
Myspace:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...ndid=335671588
K-slice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 09:39 AM   #9
Sponsor
 
1ATony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell
Posts: 1,093

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-slice View Post
I REALLY wish I had the plastic. after time the rubber ones slide out from under the glass in back and they are impossable to push back in, then they rip and you gotta cut them, just a pain.
Ok, has anyone else experienced this?
__________________

Tony
1A Auto Parts
1-866-403-3393
Check out our :Camaro Parts, Pontiac Parts
1ATony is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:26 PM   #10
Moderator
 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 9,238
Car: (2) 1987 T-top Formulas
Engine: 312 LB9, 305 LB9
Transmission: 700R4, B&W M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to okfoz
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

That was one of the problems when I bought my 87 in 1997. The rubber was pulling out of the top, it was wavy, it looked like crap. When I got the replacement kit in 1998 (for $175 what a deal) I was honestly was surprised to see that it was very different.

Some of the changes, I call them real improvements,
1) like drain holes in the A-pillar and B-pillar sections. The original stuff did not have those provisions.
2) The most obvious improvement (and the topic of this thread ) is the plastic piece that is not all wavy.

John
okfoz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:26 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 9,380
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

I dont care for the plastic myself. I never could keep it from looking chalky and once I got some wax on the edges of it, never did get it off. I've also had the door glass hit the plastic strips and sometimes not fit in the seal right because of it. Never had those issues with the old rubber seals I replaced.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 06:53 PM   #12
Moderator
 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the warmth
Posts: 3,766
Car: 87 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700-R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

From an originality perspective, I would want the rubber. Yes, the rubber ones do have a tendancy to "droop" in the heat, but that was a factory issue on the earlier cars. In response to John, regarding nobody noticing...That's now. As these cars get older, who do you think will be judging them at shows? Some of us!! If you all recall, I had points deducted from my car during a 1000 point inspection because the hush panels were not in place. The judge "thought" he knew what he was doing, but in fact he was wrong. As we continue to restore these cars, there are experts that know enough minor details to be able to judge a restored car as accurate or updated. "Correct" cars carry a higher value and being correct carries a higher status.

Case in point, I removed the inner fender liner to repair the power antenna. At the same time, I decided to put the top screw back into the heater core plastic cover. While not paying attention to which screw was which, I swapped them. For weeks I knew I did this, but knowing that it wasn't correct, I tore the dash apart again, removed the blasted hardest screw to get at with the heater core and replaced it with the correct screw. This matters to some in being correct and accurate.
scottmoyer is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 01:01 AM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Posts: 210
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

[quote=scottmoyer;4249151]From an originality perspective, I would want the rubber. Yes, the rubber ones do have a tendancy to "droop" in the heat, but that was a factory issue on the earlier cars. In response to John, regarding nobody noticing...That's now. As these cars get older, who do you think will be judging them at shows? Some of us!!

I had ordered the T-top rails from GM and was surprised to see the plastic ones. That was not right for what was on the car - I sent them back. Take that as you will. I then found a set of immaculate T-tops from a 1987 Camaro - those are comfortably stored.
GTA50 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 06:07 PM   #14
Member
 
stealtht/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Short Summer, VT
Posts: 132
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt- 3.42 open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

I say plastic. im not concerned with original, just better. my car sees some pretty extreme temp changes and the rubber ones on it now sag like crazy in the heat. looks like a licorice. they also seem to be gradually sliding out the front
stealtht/a is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 11:06 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
RockinGTA89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 745
Car: Flame Red Metallic 1989 GTA Trans
Engine: 350 TPI L98 (B2L)
Transmission: TH700 R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 and 1/2 ;)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to RockinGTA89
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Last year i bought a set of GM ttop weatherstripping kit, expensive, yes, but at least it came with the updated provisions....as long as they improved the exisiting product to prevent further issues then i'm okay with it. Of course i take my GTA everywhere in the summer and not just for cruises and car shows, but I also drive it on good days to work and of course the car is gonna be sitting in the sun so I don't want the same issue to happen again like the rubber ones....my ending conclusing on that would be..plastic...
__________________
"we are the next generation of restoration!"

"dedicated to the preservation & restoration of our third generation!"
RockinGTA89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 11:32 PM   #16
Member
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 238
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 EATON POSI

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

Plastic all the way!!! How can you go back to that rubber crap? GM made a mistake and corrected it by offering plastic replacements... I fixed mine and it looks SO much better than that wavy plastic peice that let all the water in and made noise flapping through the wind... Go with the better material, don't stay with crap just because GM offered it back in the 80's...

Later,
-Marc
__________________
"An engine is like an orchestra. It's made up of wind, brass, percussion, and a whole range of other complimentary sections, all working to make that beautiful music that we call 'performance'..."

271HP - 354TQ @ MOTOR --> 310ci LB9... (UN-TUNED)
For mods go here --> http://1986irocz.tripod.com/
hellz_wings is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:11 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
KITT1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 830
Car: 1983 Pontiac Trans Am Daytona 500
Engine: Crossfire 305ci V8
Transmission: 700R4 4 speed Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip/posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to KITT1983
Re: 82-92 Camaro & Firebird T-Top Roof Rails

any updates?
__________________

KITT The White Phantom
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/vb...ber-78092.html
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3112754
Knight Rider will never die !!!!
KITT1983 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > History / Restoration

Tags
3rd, 82, 89, 91, 92, body, camaro, differences, firbird, firebird, fit, gen, parts, restoration, rubber, ttop, ttops
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.