Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

LTX and LSX Putting LT1's, LS1's, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects, including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2005, 09:29 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
lt1 408?

Is it possible to make a 408 lt1? using 4.00 crank, and 4.030 bore? Are there any negative effects of using this stroke? I haven't seen any 408 lt1s, i've seen a lot of 396 lt1s. I'm thinking of rebuilding the lt1 with better components and add some displacement while i'm at it before I drop it in my car, so I don't have to do it twice. I'm not planning to rev the motor past 6k, maximum 6500 rpm.
__________________
LT1 swap in progress.
91rs5.0 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2005, 11:30 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
TexasLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Angleton, TX
Posts: 3,810
Car: '92 RS
Engine: 396 LT1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70BW

Classifieds Rating: (0)
no, 396 is as far as I've ever seen anyone go on a factory block, and that in itself is pushing the limits of the block. If you want to go that far, get an aftermarket block and stay away from anything LT1, there is no point if you want large cubic inches.


*Edit* After rereading what I typed, I'm pretty sure I've seen 1 or 2 408's, but I'm almost positive they went with a SB400 block, and in doing so its not really an LT1 anymore.

If you want cubes, go with a 383 and not have to worry if your cylinder walls are too thin.

Last edited by TexasLT1; 04-17-2005 at 11:32 PM.
TexasLT1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:01 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by TexasLT1
no, 396 is as far as I've ever seen anyone go on a factory block, and that in itself is pushing the limits of the block. If you want to go that far, get an aftermarket block and stay away from anything LT1, there is no point if you want large cubic inches.


*Edit* After rereading what I typed, I'm pretty sure I've seen 1 or 2 408's, but I'm almost positive they went with a SB400 block, and in doing so its not really an LT1 anymore.

If you want cubes, go with a 383 and not have to worry if your cylinder walls are too thin.
why is 396 pushing the limits of the block? 396 is still .30 over right? just with 3.875 stroke instead of 3.750. Unless you mean its too much stress on the rods or something like that.
91rs5.0 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:03 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
sorry i meant .030
91rs5.0 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 08:14 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 91rs5.0
why is 396 pushing the limits of the block? 396 is still .30 over right? just with 3.875 stroke instead of 3.750. Unless you mean its too much stress on the rods or something like that.
Correct. However there are far more clearance issues with the larger crank than with a 383. A lot more items need to be grounded, the stock windage tray will no longer fit. You also run into running (not always) a smaller base circle cam.

A 408 LT1 has been done, believe it was done by combination motorsports or some other vendor. There are a few out I believe it involved a billet 4.000 stroke crank and boring .030 over. Not very practical for an extra 10 cubes.


Stick with the 383 or 396 you won't gain much more performance with the extra 9 cubes, i'd say 10 more rwhp at most.


f your pockets are extremely deep you could always sleeve a lt1 block and make a 427. That has also been done, but yet again impractical when a 400 sbc can be netted for 1/5 the cost of building a 427 lt1.
__________________

91 RS Camaro | 383 LT1/T-56
Stage III ported heads | CC306 Cam | Electric Waterpump
1.6:1 Rocker Arms | SLP headers | 3" Exhaust
Forged Rotating assembly | Whole lot of *** woopin!
Best time (with stock cam on the old 350): 60' 2.396 - 13.733 @ 107.48 MPH

Last edited by pasky; 04-18-2005 at 08:18 PM.
pasky is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2005, 11:40 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ok. then i think i'm gonna go the 383 route. i can use stock windage tray and all with that right? can i clearance the block myself, or is that better left to the machineshop?
91rs5.0 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 12:03 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yes it can be done yourself, looking at mine all it seems like they did was put the crank and rods in the block and see where the rod bolts touched and just took some metal off the block near the bottom of the cylinder bores to clear them. You will need to run washers on the stock windage tray to clear the rod bolts and bang the stock oil pan a little near the sides.
__________________

91 RS Camaro | 383 LT1/T-56
Stage III ported heads | CC306 Cam | Electric Waterpump
1.6:1 Rocker Arms | SLP headers | 3" Exhaust
Forged Rotating assembly | Whole lot of *** woopin!
Best time (with stock cam on the old 350): 60' 2.396 - 13.733 @ 107.48 MPH
pasky is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2005, 12:03 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

Tags
396, 408, 427, 5speed, aftermarket, block, combination, cylinder, kit, lt1, motors, motorsports, sale, sleeve, stroker
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details