Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

LTX and LSX Putting LT1's, LS1's, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects, including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2008, 01:59 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 556
Car: 1992 z28
Engine: 383 LT1 in the works
Transmission: T-56 in the works
Axle/Gears: 3.73 in the works

Classifieds Rating: (0)
MAF sensor

I have a 383 LT1 in the works and was looking to upgrade to granetelli's MAF sensor. I read on golens engines website that they recommend NOT using anything other than the factory MAF. Anyone know why? Has anyone went with an upgraded aftermarket MAF on the performance LT1 builds or just stayed with stock? Will I really see any gains with a granetelli MAF?
__________________
1992 z28 - 383 LT1,T-56, $$$$$ more
1988 Iroc-Z - 305 TPI, 5-speed. Bone stock and mint - SOLD
1989 RS - 94 LT1/T-56/disc brake rear with 28k mi for CMC2 build
SomeGuy25thZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 03:30 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Klortho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, Tn
Posts: 2,922
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: MAF sensor

Alot of guys I know who have built LT1s around locally either went speed density or used the stock MAF.
Klortho is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:17 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AL,USA
Posts: 920
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 95 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Weak 7.5 with 4.10s

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: MAF sensor

I ran an aftermarket MAS for a while. I didn't notice any performance gains and I had some idle problems I couldn't figure out. I put a stock one back on and the idle smoothed out. Apparently it is a lot harder to tune with an aftermarket MAS. The reason I went back to a stock one is because the aftermarket one failed.
__________________
90 Firebird Formula (Stephen)Sold!
LT1/T56(formerly 305TPI/T5), 355 with LE1 heads and cam, Hooker 2210s, 1le Brakes, alston subframe connectors, Spohn tubular control arms and panhard rod, Jegster torque arm, Richmond 4:10 gears and all new interior and paint.
Working A/C!
My car on Cardomain (updated 12/27/06).http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2415999/1

92 Oldsmobile Silhouette (Agnes)

62 Galaxie 500 An old friend that found his way back.
bingo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:28 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,616
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: MAF sensor

stock Camaro TPI style intake system with stock MAF without screens will support 400whp easily. I was right there with stock TPI MAF/intake ducting. Switched to a 3.5" MAF and CAI tubing and have yet to notice any gains, mild ones if any. Its not 100% tuned with the setup but its close, like 90-95%. I expect maybe 10hp from it if that

How much do you plan on making? I'd just stick with stocker if your not over that 400 whp mark by much, which is right where MOST heads/cam LT1 383's are anyway
Orr89RocZ is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 08:34 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 556
Car: 1992 z28
Engine: 383 LT1 in the works
Transmission: T-56 in the works
Axle/Gears: 3.73 in the works

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: MAF sensor

Sounds good guys.. I am running 383 LT1 with full ported heads, intake, pretty decent cam with 11.5:1 compression and all the goodies... Not sure what to expect with this but was told by the original engine builder that he was expecting ~450 hp but I dont know if that is to the wheels or the crank. We will hopefully find out by next summer...
SomeGuy25thZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 07:31 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 15,616
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Re: MAF sensor

410-430 at the wheels is the most i've been seeing for a decent streetable 383 LT1 setup

He probly is expecting crank hp which 450 isnt bad at all, but its easy to get 475-500 out of a ported head 383 LT1, depends on the head porting and how big a cam you get
Orr89RocZ is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 07:31 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

Tags
4th, 89, 91, airflow, camaro, firebird, gen, granetelli, location, maf, mass, performance, problem, sensor, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details