Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

LTX and LSX Putting LT1's, LS1's, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects, including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2009, 11:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
89ROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 979
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI LB9
Transmission: WC T-5 Pro 5.0
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I was diggin around for intakes and found an amazing thread on the hp differences on the 3 intakes. The professional products 96mm looks like it can handle some power!

(i hope i'm not breaking any rules by posting this here, if i am please delete)

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...e-numbers.html
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
UMI SFC's * UMI STB * UMI Adj. Panhard * UMI LCARB'S * 36/24mm w/ Spohn Poly * GM Wonderbar * Hotpart LCA's * KYB GR-2's * Hooker Super-Comp 2055's * QTP SS Cut-Out * Magnaflow 3" Stainless Steel Cat-Back * Custom Prom * Pro 5.0 Power Tower Shifter * 17" IROC's are on!!!
***To Install: Dropzone Springs


<---- Detailed List of Mods In vBGarage...Check 'em out!!
ProCharged 6.0 LSX & T-56 Swap In the Works, Still Looking for T-56 So PM Me.
89ROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 07-12-2009, 11:13 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
SheldonZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 1,010
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z/'97 transam
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 LS1 Disc

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to SheldonZ28 Send a message via MSN to SheldonZ28 Send a message via Skype™ to SheldonZ28
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Look closer at the graph.

LS6 & Professional Products HP wise were identical until approx 6000rpm, where the LS6 fell off a tad, (7ish hp, not much at all)

LS6 made more tq down low, and then the professional products again picked up a little bit at 5600rpm.

FAST intake produced the best under the curve power, peak power etc.

After seeing those graphs, no way would i invest in a Proffessional products intake. Identical to LS6 until high RPM where minimal gains are seen, and the LS6 delivers more tq. Not to mention the Professional products is a Aluminum intake, and is much more prone to heat sink then a nylon intake, so after a 45 minute drive, it would likely be performing identical to the LS6 at all points.

IMO, its LS6 or FAST for cathedral port heads. Ive yet to see anything really do as well.

Even for boost, i build a 402ci w/ Paxton Novi 2000, using an LS6 intake it made 839rwhp, and my buddy's vette is a 402ci w/ Vortech YSi, makes 922rwhp w/ LS6 intake.

Sometimes its not nessicary to go further then the general's parts
SheldonZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 12:11 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Aaron91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 726
Car: RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" for the ladies

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Metal intakes like the professional products ones heat soak and add weight to the nose
Only thing they are good for is containing a nitrous backfire or boost, so they have their place.
Beyond that all metal intakes suck for the same reason.

From personal experiance the ls6 intake keeps up until about 90mph at which point my FAST intake seems to pull away.
All those idiots keep complaining about how much the FAST costs. Well actually it's the ones still running the ls6 trying to feel better about continually losing to FAST motors.

I want to laugh in their face every time the price thing comes up and remind them all I got my FAST for $550 off ebay brand new with live's 30% cash back and everyone of them could have done the same thing so boo fricking hoo.

Last edited by Aaron91RS; 07-12-2009 at 12:34 PM.
Aaron91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 06:07 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baldwin Park
Posts: 77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I’m actually looking into Edelbrock new intake for the LS swap crowd “Pro-Flo XT.” They run about $430 and I can sell my LS6 for about $300. The initial model had some fitment issues (throttle body and injectors) but Edelbrock has addressed this issues in the newer model.



Waiting on dyno results for a Fast 92/92 vs. Edelbrock

Check out the buzz on ls1tech:
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/genera...than-fast.html
Z28FAST1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 06:07 PM   #5
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 33,342
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: 86 LG4-> ZZ3(LS1)/mild 396
Transmission: TH700(T56)/TH400
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt 3.23(4.10)/8.2" 10-bolt4.11

Classifieds Rating: (3)
$550 for 17 HP seems insane to me. Got to be cheaper ways to get that kind of gain.

But, I'm new here. . .
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 07:42 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Aaron91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 726
Car: RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" for the ladies

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

$500+fuel rails$+trying to fit under a low hood which it won't clear.
Yet another try and fail to knock off the fast intake.
Why is this so hard I don't understand.
The fast is nothing more then an ls1/ls6 with bigger runners and TB.
Yet in all the years it's been out instead of just copying GM's design abeit with bigger runners every other manufactorer keeps trying to reinvent the wheel. Half the time they end up 'just about ready to debut' and never make it out of the gate and the rest have fitment issues that require different injectors, fuel rails, lines, TB fitment etc etc.

Good grief there is HUGE money to be made if you just come in and copy the fast intake and resell it at $500.
It blows my mind competitors continue to let fast bask in their total domination at a 4 figure price.
Aaron91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 08:27 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baldwin Park
Posts: 77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron91RS View Post
$500+fuel rails$+trying to fit under a low hood which it won't clear.
Yet another try and fail to knock off the fast intake.
Why is this so hard I don't understand.
The fast is nothing more then an ls1/ls6 with bigger runners and TB.
Yet in all the years it's been out instead of just copying GM's design abeit with bigger runners every other manufactorer keeps trying to reinvent the wheel. Half the time they end up 'just about ready to debut' and never make it out of the gate and the rest have fitment issues that require different injectors, fuel rails, lines, TB fitment etc etc.

Good grief there is HUGE money to be made if you just come in and copy the fast intake and resell it at $500.
It blows my mind competitors continue to let fast bask in their total domination at a 4 figure price.
$439 from Summit but the target price was $350 which might be reached once production catches up with the demand.

Small mods will allow the LS1 type fuel rails to work as noted in the thread.

As far as clearance goes, I have a 3 inch cowl so I don’t see it being an issue for me. I believe it’s only a bit taller than the L76 truck manifolds.

I really want to see what kind of power these things put down vs. the FAST 92/92. If I could get a FAST 92/92 @ 30% it wouldn’t even be a question!!! Plus I agree with you about aftermarket companies failing to duplicate FAST results. I was hoping Edelbrock took a step in the right direction and drove the competition to lower its price.

At this point it makes it difficult for me to spend $1,250+ for a FAST 92/92 NW for 20-25 rwhp. I think i'll just change out my nitrous jets from 125rwhp to 150rwhp in a few minutes for free
Z28FAST1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 10:41 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
89ROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 979
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI LB9
Transmission: WC T-5 Pro 5.0
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Why they even cost that much is beyond me. If i can find a used FAST i'd get it if its under 500.

And that edelbrock looks like they tried to make a copy of a sheet metal intake, except 4" taller.
89ROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 09:06 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Klortho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, Tn
Posts: 2,549
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I still think that the 879.95 price of the FAST for another 20hp is sort of stupid as well.

I know plenty of guys running 10's in the 1/4 running the LS6 intake, that's the route I'll be going.
__________________
1987 GTA, LT1/T56 BW 9bolt 3.70 posi
1 of 372 Midnight Russet Metallic
Klortho is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 09:49 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 2,446
Car: '84 Trans Am, &'82 Camaro
Engine: LM7, & 454
Transmission: 4L60E, & 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, & none

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I've seen a 35 hp gain switching to the FAST 90, but as I'll be adding a pair of T4S04s, spooling up to 13.5 psi, I'm leaning toward BBK's cast aluminum.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 10:39 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
89ROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 979
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI LB9
Transmission: WC T-5 Pro 5.0
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

yea i could get a ls6 and have it ported to 90 by tpis down the road from me. Then geta NW 90 TB. HMM, by the time i buy the intake, port it, and buy a TB im at 1K already. Then might as well spend another couple hundred and get this fast 92/92 for 1200 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FAST-...Q5fAccessories
__________________
UMI SFC's * UMI STB * UMI Adj. Panhard * UMI LCARB'S * 36/24mm w/ Spohn Poly * GM Wonderbar * Hotpart LCA's * KYB GR-2's * Hooker Super-Comp 2055's * QTP SS Cut-Out * Magnaflow 3" Stainless Steel Cat-Back * Custom Prom * Pro 5.0 Power Tower Shifter * 17" IROC's are on!!!
***To Install: Dropzone Springs


<---- Detailed List of Mods In vBGarage...Check 'em out!!
ProCharged 6.0 LSX & T-56 Swap In the Works, Still Looking for T-56 So PM Me.
89ROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 10:43 AM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE & KS
Posts: 172
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I've had a few of these intakes. LS6 is a nice piece all around and i dont have any complaints about it. The Fast is definitly a nice piece as well, and is a proven performer which is why so many of them are running around on the streets. The Professional Products intake is junk. main reason i dont like it is the style of gaskets used. Too many people have had problems with them leaking. The stock LS1 style gasket intakes work the best (fast, ls6, and BBK). I've ran the BBK. overall its a very nice piece, only down fall to it is the weight you pick up but i did gain a few ponies with it, and it holds up to any NOS backfires you might have. As far as heat soak is concerned, its a joke. Heatsoak doesnt matter. take a temp gun and check your temps on a composite intake and a aluminum intake on a running motor. IAT temps are still the same on both. On a carb'd app, its a big deal. Too many people believe what they read on forums.

so to cap this all off. FAST, BBK, and LS6 are all very nice. Pro Prod is a piece of S#*T, and i dont know anything about the edelbrock piece yet
andrew69_04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

Tags
9292, backfire, bbk, body, build, edelbrock, fast, high, ls6, mods, ported, products, professional, rpm, throttle
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.