Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

LTX and LSX Putting LT1's, LS1's, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects, including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-06-2009, 08:29 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9

Classifieds Rating: (0)
5.3L vs. 5.7L

Hey guys, i'm the new owner of an 89 rs. I am looking to swap an LS series motor into it, and i have been searching ls1's, but they are seeming to be too expensive. My question is that i can find a 5.3L for way cheaper and i have heard that the same cam and heads will work for either of the motors. Is this true? also, how hard is it to swap the 5.3 (or 5.7) into my RS? thanks. by the way, great site. Ive been a member for only a short time and i have already doubled my knowledge on third gens.

-Michael
MMMichael is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 09:39 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 4,386
Car: 89 RS, 86 TA
Engine: 6.0 Trex, 5.3 cammed, both carbed
Transmission: T56 CFDFX, TH400 3000stall
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 3.23 gov

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Yes, it is true, but it is still costly in the end. A LS swap is still not "cheap" like a SBC to SBC swap.
__________________

Built Not Bought

www.fquick.com/zones89rs
ZONES89RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 09:55 PM   #3
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,522
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.

Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.

There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.

If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 08:56 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
kowalzekc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Welcome aboard thirdgen.org.

Read the sticky about LS1 swaps in the top section of this forum to get an idea of what is ahead of you.

There is a thread on ls1tech about doing an LSx swap for $1500 using the 5.3's. But, he's not putting them in 3rd gen f-bodies so he can keep the truck intake, oil pan, exhaust manifolds, and accessories. Add all of that to the cost of the engine when comparing it to a 4th gen f-body engine, then you can figure the rest of the costs and swap difficulties are a wash.

If you're going to use a truck engine, might as well make it a 6.0. They go for only a little more than the 5.3's.
I agree, unless you want the high rpms from the 5.3, the 6.0 is the way to go. I am looking at doing the same swap myself and I am torn between these two engines. I have heard with a head rebuild, cam swap and a few other things, you can crank out some outstanding power from the 6.0. A BIG expence in going to be headers, they run $800+ for a set of long tubes, but you can get away with 98+ fbody manifolds. Anouther option that some people choose to do is convert thier LSx to carb. You can run a traditional distributor or MSD makes a easy to install wiring harness and ingnition box to control timing. I will probably go with this route myself just because I do not want to mess with coputer tuning.

Welcome to the board, post some pictures of you projects as they progress.
kowalzekc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 01:36 PM   #5
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,522
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
Anouther option that some people choose to do is convert thier LSx to carb. You can run a traditional distributor or MSD makes a easy to install wiring harness and ingnition box to control timing. I will probably go with this route myself just because I do not want to mess with coputer tuning.
Computer tuning is cheap in comparison. Also not likely to be needed.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:22 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
kowalzekc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Computer tuning is cheap in comparison. Also not likely to be needed.
Depends on application and modifications. Also, it is alot easier to tune at a track with a carb then with FI, unless you have all the programs and really know what you are doing. Also, it is cheaper to make big amounts of HP with a carb then FI. There is no worrying about high pressure injectors, larger fuel rails, and higher performance fuel managments systems. However, if you are just droping in a LSx motor and leaving stock, it is cheaper to keep the FI. I think to go carb it is going to cost me and extra 600+ easy and I think I am being modest. However I do think it is neat to see someone carb one of these, just my opinion.
kowalzekc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 06:42 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Shift06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 814
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shift06 Send a message via MSN to Shift06
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

I think an LS1 pullout is probably cheapest. Sure it's more initially than a 5.3 but you're going to have to buy an LS1 intake, fbody accessories, fbody pan, windage and pickup etc.. anyways. Unless you can do the whole swap for dirt cheap it wouldn't be worth it anyways. Most people can't seem to do it dirt cheap so an extra $XXX for the LS1 versus a 5.3 or whatever isn't going to be a huge deal when you look at the overall price of the swap.
__________________


'91 GTA WS6 | '99 LS1 / 4L60E
Shift06 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 07:03 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.

-Michael
MMMichael is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 07:53 PM   #9
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,522
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift06 View Post
I think an LS1 pullout is probably cheapest. Sure it's more initially than a 5.3 but you're going to have to buy an LS1 intake, fbody accessories, fbody pan, windage and pickup etc.. anyways.
My point exactly.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 07:58 PM   #10
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,522
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
Depends on application and modifications. Also, it is alot easier to tune at a track with a carb then with FI, unless you have all the programs and really know what you are doing.
Highly unlikely to need to tune at the track. Unless you're going to the track to tune.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
Also, it is cheaper to make big amounts of HP with a carb then FI. There is no worrying about high pressure injectors, larger fuel rails, and higher performance fuel managments systems.
Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
However, if you are just droping in a LSx motor and leaving stock, it is cheaper to keep the FI.
The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
I think to go carb it is going to cost me and extra 600+ easy and I think I am being modest.
I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kowalzekc View Post
However I do think it is neat to see someone carb one of these, just my opinion.
I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
five7kid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:13 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
kowalzekc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 67

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Highly unlikely to need to tune at the track. Unless you're going to the track to tune.

Gen I SBC's, I'd agree. LSx, not true.


The OP hasn't indicated any particular use for the car. If we assume driver, then carb makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I think you're underestimating, unless you have most of the parts already in hand.


I don't see anything neat about it, personally. Plenty have already done it. A couple in particular are very fast, but they're track cars, not DD's.
Learn new stuff everyday, I am looking at creating a track car.
kowalzekc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:06 PM   #12
Supreme Member
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St Charles, MO
Posts: 5,445
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Send a message via AIM to BlueZee28
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMMichael View Post
Well what are the different in deciding a cam choice between a 5.3 and a 6.0? i have wondered about the 6.0 but i didnt know what the difference was in the internals as compared to the 5.7 LS1 or the 5.3. I found a cam from texas speed and i would like to know if it will work or not. thanks alot guys, this forum is helping me out ALOT.

-Michael
When you're talking about a GenIII block (LS1, LS6, LQ4, LQ9, 5.3L whatever it's acronym is...), a cam is a cam. It's like an old school sbc, cams are interchangable. Now, the behavior of the cam is going to vary slightly depending on which displacement you're going with. For instance, the Texas Speed 224R is a *relatively* small cam, and when you put it in a 6.0L it's nature will tone down slightly more. Bigger cubes tend to want bigger cams to get the same effect as a smaller cam in a smaller cube block. I put Texas Speed's MS4 cam in my 6.0, some say that is a nasty big cam, I say so what, and besides it's going in a 6.0 not a 5.7, so it will tone down slightly from what you'd experience with a regular LS1.
__________________
2nd Place Modified Camaro - ThirdGen Fest '11
LSX / T56 combo, 420rwhp 407 ft./lbs. custom Ford 8.8" with 9" axle tubes, 4.10's and Ford Racing Cobra diff, Moser axles, LS1 brake swap front and rear, Hawks 1 3/4" longtubes, forged internals, TSP MS4, LS6 intake, Spohn LCA's/torque arm/cross member/k member/subframe connectors, Alston subframe connectors, Hotchkis springs, poly motor/trans mounts & sway bar bushings/end links, Memphis Audio / Pioneer audio system, etc etc et
BlueZee28 is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 10:47 AM   #13
On Probation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 5,261
Car: '84 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LQ9 w/ Wegner LS6 heads
Transmission: 4L60E, seeking good used NV3550HD
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, posi, swapping to 8.5"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 5.3L vs. 5.7L

right now just get it built with a 5.3. Later you can start on a better LSx using an L92 block, CNC-ported L92/LS3 heads, a stroker crank, and whatever else you'd really like.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 10:47 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

Tags
53, 53l, 57, 57l, 60, accessories, betweem, chevy, difference, engine, fbody, make, pull, swap, swapping, wiring
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details