Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

LTX and LSX Putting LT1's, LS1's, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects, including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2009, 02:48 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 210
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
1991 TA 5.3L swap - some ?'s before I begin

I am about to start my swap, and the goal is to have the car driving again by May 1st. Here is what I am planning so far. How does this sound?

Engine
2004 5.3 LM7 with stock 706 heads
LS6 cam and yellow springs (02-04) with 7.425 pushrods
LS6 intake
LS6 valley cover
Stock fuel injectors
Fbody accessories with UD pulley and no AC
Fbody oil pan

Everything else
Stock rebuilt 4L60e
Stall for daily driver?
Stock K member
Hawks engine and trans swap mounts with poly bushings
00+ fbody exhaust manifolds - can these be ported?
Custom y pipe and 3” back
10 bolt? Current 2.73, maybe 3.23 or 3.42?
Stock TPI fuel pump?

The car is going to be a daily driver and probably won’t see the track.
__________________


Greg
1991 Trans Am

Last edited by no1kicker; 12-02-2009 at 07:43 PM. Reason: I have 706 heads if it matters
no1kicker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 04:56 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
1ADan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pepperell, MA
Posts: 2,799
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LQ9/L92
Transmission: 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

sounds a lot like the swap I'm working towards in the same amount of time (hopefully). I think the 10-bolt may be a bit of the weak point here, but will handle as a DD for some time while you're saving up for things. Any idea what you're doing for wiring? I know I was told to stay away from the 98 year, since its a bit different than those after. May want to up the fuel pump, but I'll leave that to someone else.

make sure to get some sfc's, you're gonna need it. make sure to keep everyone updated, we all love pics of 3rd gens with LSx motors
__________________

1987 Trans Am, 6.0/4L60E swap, work in progress
2008 Pontiac G8, stayin' stock
Customer Service Manager, 1A Auto Parts
Become a Fan of 1A Auto on Facebook
1ADan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 06:27 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Shift06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 814
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shift06 Send a message via MSN to Shift06
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

Same car as my swap I am swapping in a '99 LS1 with a cam and ported heads, I hoped to have it done quickly but I've been on the project since February XD

I am using '02 SS Manifolds, and the stock 10 bolt w/ 2.73's for now lol. I also just scored a brand new from GM 4L60E for 600 bucks Canadian
__________________


'91 GTA WS6 | '99 LS1 / 4L60E
Shift06 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 07:28 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St Charles, MO
Posts: 5,448
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Send a message via AIM to BlueZee28
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

You're gonna want to upgrade the fuel pump. Everything else sounds good though.
__________________
2nd Place Modified Camaro - ThirdGen Fest '11
LSX / T56 combo, 420rwhp 407 ft./lbs. custom Ford 8.8" with 9" axle tubes, 4.10's and Ford Racing Cobra diff, Moser axles, LS1 brake swap front and rear, Hawks 1 3/4" longtubes, forged internals, TSP MS4, LS6 intake, Spohn LCA's/torque arm/cross member/k member/subframe connectors, Alston subframe connectors, Hotchkis springs, poly motor/trans mounts & sway bar bushings/end links, Memphis Audio / Pioneer audio system, etc etc et
BlueZee28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 08:17 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shawano, WI
Posts: 106
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 350-Carb
Transmission: 700-R4

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

I think u are probably want sumthin like 1600-1800 stall if daily driver with 3.23. Good mpg and engine should make power pretty quick.
madbomber824 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 09:42 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Shift06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 814
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shift06 Send a message via MSN to Shift06
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

Yeah I used a Walbro GSS340 fuel pump, was only like $99 bucks at Summit and is rated for like 500 HP or something. I also used poly mounts. I had major fitment issues with the Spohn mounts and poly inserts but that seems to be a problem limited to me only for whatever reason.
__________________


'91 GTA WS6 | '99 LS1 / 4L60E
Shift06 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 10:26 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Pocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 6,038
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: Supercharged 6.0
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.55 locker

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Pocket
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

5.3 is a good DD engine but not LS6 intake stuff. It wont take full advantage of it to be worth the money. Buy the cheapo LS1 intakes

For a DD, Id stick to the stock stall. If you absolutely have to upgrade, LSx doesnt respond well unless you go big. Say 3000 or better

Fuel pump needs a boost, TPI is designed around 45psi. LS1 is 58psi constant and will wear it out quickly

Porting manifolds is a waste of time and carbide bits. If you want more power, get headers

Your MPG will like the 2.73's. Your tires will like a posi more than open diff. Dropping the gearing will make it alot faster than any other mod but your MPG will hate it
Pocket is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 12:10 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shawano, WI
Posts: 106
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 350-Carb
Transmission: 700-R4

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pocket View Post
For a DD, Id stick to the stock stall. If you absolutely have to upgrade, LSx doesnt respond well unless you go big. Say 3000 or better

Your MPG will like the 2.73's. Your tires will like a posi more than open diff. Dropping the gearing will make it alot faster than any other mod but your MPG will hate it
yeah i think a stock stall would prob be best...i wasn't thinking too much of what i said before. I would definatally prefer a little higher gearing if i were u. its really ur call dude! well good luck and hopefully u get it done by ur deadline!!!
madbomber824 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 08:26 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: RI
Posts: 210
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 1991 Trans Am LSx auto

Quote:
the 10-bolt may be a bit of the weak point here, but will handle as a DD for some time while you're saving up for things.
I'm hoping for just over 300whp, I have read that the 10 bolt might handle this, I will try it out at least. Probably a good idea to wait on gears if the rear might go anyways. There doesn’t seem to be much difference in 3.23 vs. 3.42 so either one would work for me.

Quote:
You're gonna want to upgrade the fuel pump.
Is there anything I can do to make the fuel pump last longer? For all I know, it might be original. If the pump goes, that's when I would upgrade the rear. If I used an LS1 fuel tank and stock LS1 pump, would I be ok?

Quote:
Any idea what you're doing for wiring?
I have all of the connectors and wiring diagrams so I am going to try and make my harness myself. I know it will take me several weekends, but it can be done indoors so that’s a plus in the winter. Is there any reason besides for looks to put the PCM inside the car?

Quote:
I had major fitment issues with the Spohn mounts and poly inserts
I saw that in your thread, hopefully there is a simple solution. I already have the engine and trans mount adapters, and the engine clamshells with poly inserts. For the trans mount, would I just order a poly mount for a 98+ fbody?

[quote]5.3 is a good DD engine but not LS6 intake stuff. It wont take full advantage of it to be worth the money.[quote]
Are you talking about the intake manifold? Truck guys seem to have good results with the LS6 cam, but I think most of them are still using the truck intake. The LS6 valley cover/PCV seems to fix oil issues, but I don’t know if I need to worry about that with a basically stock engine.

Quote:
For a DD, Id stick to the stock stall.
Stock converter, or aftermarket with the same stall speed? If anyone even makes that.

Quote:
Porting manifolds is a waste of time and carbide bits. If you want more power, get headers
A waste of time as in little to no gain, or not close to headers? I ask only because GTP guys seem to pick up small gains (my other car is a GTP). If I could get even 5-10 hp by porting them I would try it. But I haven't read about anyone porting the LS1 manifolds, probably because they just get headers like you said.

Sorry for the long post, and thanks for the replies so far. My car is eagerly awaiting the transplant in the garage.
no1kicker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 09:24 PM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Pocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 6,038
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: Supercharged 6.0
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.55 locker

Classifieds Rating: (19)
Send a message via AIM to Pocket
Re: 1991 TA 5.3L swap - some ?'s before I begin

300 through an auto shouldnt kill the 10 bolt unless you drive like a retard

The fuel pump isnt meant to run at the higher PSI. Im not sure how else to tell you. Easy solution is the pump from a LS1 car in your stock tank. Forget the LS1 tank, thats alot of extra problems

The LS1 PCM was designed to be heat resistant and waterproof. Thus 4th gens mounted it in the engine bay. Most people move it under the dash because there really isnt a good place to put it in the 3rd gen. Plus it looks terrible

You should be fine on the mounts. Do a search on poly trans mounts. Youll see most people still run the rubber trans mount because poly isnt so nice

I was talking about the LS6 plastic intake manifold

LSx manifolds regardless of what vehicle they came from are essentially cast iron shorty headers designed for the specific engine they were equipped on. If you upgrade, go longtubes or go home

Have fun wiring. PM me if you have a question or get stuck. I wrote 3 wiring threads to take 99% of the common problems out of the job
Pocket is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 09:44 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St Charles, MO
Posts: 5,448
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears

Classifieds Rating: (20)
Send a message via AIM to BlueZee28
Re: 1991 TA 5.3L swap - some ?'s before I begin

I agree with everything Pocket just said.


I found it easiest just to put a good fuel pump in my stock tank (Walbro 255). Then I made my own fuel lines, using the part numbers from Pocket's diagram that you can find with a search.

Stock manifolds are basically shorties. If you are going to upgrade get the Hawks/SSW longtubes.

I wanted my PCM inside the car because I think that it looks pretty tacky with it mounted under the hood when you spend all this money on such a cool swap and then ruin it with all the brains laying on top of one of the fenders.


Your stock rear end will be fine...for a while. I can't say the same about mine though. I have a stock LS1 rear end with 3.42's and will be running a 6spd behind an approx. 450hp motor..... Yea, I'm saving up for a 12 bolt and trying to suck up to my wife enough to let me buy one.
__________________
2nd Place Modified Camaro - ThirdGen Fest '11
LSX / T56 combo, 420rwhp 407 ft./lbs. custom Ford 8.8" with 9" axle tubes, 4.10's and Ford Racing Cobra diff, Moser axles, LS1 brake swap front and rear, Hawks 1 3/4" longtubes, forged internals, TSP MS4, LS6 intake, Spohn LCA's/torque arm/cross member/k member/subframe connectors, Alston subframe connectors, Hotchkis springs, poly motor/trans mounts & sway bar bushings/end links, Memphis Audio / Pioneer audio system, etc etc et
BlueZee28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 09:44 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Engine Swap > LTX and LSX

Tags
1991, 224, 53, 53l, cam, camaro, cast, fuel, insert, ls1, mount, obs, pcm, poly, pump, swap, waterproof
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details