| Re: Rotating vs static vs sprung and unsprung wt Sprung v unsprung weight is more of a handling issue then an acceleration issue.... The old equation is that a 1 lb. reduction of unsprung weight is equal to a 6 or 7 pound reduction in sprung weight...
The weight v acceleration concerns the overall weight of the car, a 100 lb. reduction equals a 1/10 sec. reduction in ET... Reducing weight in the rear end, as Stphen 87 stated, allows the components in the drivetrain to accelerate faster, therefore lowering your ET... Any reduction of the rotating mass in the engine and drivetrain will make for quicker acceleration.
Just keep in mind the basics of physics, an object at rest tends to stay at rest and the greater the mass (weight) the slower the rate of acceleration.... However, remember the other side of physics laws--an object in motion tends to stay in motion....so things like a 40lb. flywheel on a five speed car v a 20 pound aluminum flywheel, the heavy flywheel will help to keep the revs up when you shift..... |