History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Old 07-27-2009, 12:38 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
daveb123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: BW T-10
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

I knew it was bound to happen- The Toyota dealer next door took in a 3rd gen on cash for clunkers! Not just any 3rd gen either, it's an '89 IROC,
L98 G92 car- In pretty good shape too! What a shame!
daveb123 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 12:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
quickkris2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: jackson new jersey
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 camaro vert
Engine: ls1 soon
Transmission: t56 soon
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt 4.10 soon!
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

you should go ask how much they want for it b4 they send it to the junk yard i was watching the news and thats what they are doing with all the turn ins
quickkris2006 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 01:03 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
 
daveb123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: BW T-10
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

They can't sell the car- Once the VIN goes into the C4C system- the car has to go to a junkyard that is required to destroy the engine & transmisson.
daveb123 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 01:05 PM
  #4  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

 
Old 07-27-2009, 01:16 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Kevman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Cash for clunkers does do one good thing....

Brings the value of mine up
Kevman is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 08:31 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Timinsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LS
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

STEAL IT there must be a way to save it!!!
Timinsk is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 08:55 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Gearhead291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Timinsk
STEAL IT there must be a way to save it!!!
yea there's got to be a way! they cant just take classic cars and crush them WTF
Gearhead291 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 08:58 PM
  #8  
Member
 
KatsCam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Coupe
Engine: 5.0-liter (305) TBI V8
Transmission: 700R4-speed automatic overdrive
Axle/Gears: stock/2.73
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

I just want to puke about this. Damn!
KatsCam is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:00 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Are there any rules on what qualifies?

I mean, if the emissions are clean & the car is solid, s far as driiveability goes....It's not REALLY a clunker, right?
Stephen is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:07 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Gearhead291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Stephen
Are there any rules on what qualifies?

I mean, if the emissions are clean & the car is solid, s far as driiveability goes....It's not REALLY a clunker, right?

i think it has to do with the original MPG
Gearhead291 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:08 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Stephen
Are there any rules on what qualifies?

I mean, if the emissions are clean & the car is solid, s far as driiveability goes....It's not REALLY a clunker, right?
its just a government scam to try and get people to buy new cars, boost the economy ect.

As for getting the car, it probably wont happen unless you can pull some strings at the junkyard before they wreck it. If not, carve it up for parts
//<86TA>\\ is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:09 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Gearhead291
yea there's got to be a way! they cant just take classic cars and crush them WTF
sure they can
//<86TA>\\ is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:14 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Gearhead291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
sure they can

well there needs to be an exception
Gearhead291 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:14 PM
  #14  
Member

Thread Starter
 
daveb123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: BW T-10
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Stephen
Are there any rules on what qualifies?

I mean, if the emissions are clean & the car is solid, s far as driiveability goes....It's not REALLY a clunker, right?
Yeah, that's what is so ironic & stupid about this program- the cars have to be licensed, insured and inspected for one year, meaning they have passed the emissions test within the last year- The car I started this thread about had a shiny new cat in it's exhaust! We are junking clean cars!
daveb123 is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:20 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
89RS_82Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairhope, AL
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89RS(other cars & pics in vBgarage)
Engine: LO3, 305 TBI Mildly Modified
Transmission: BakerBuilt 700R4 w/B&M Megashifter
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Auburn Pro Series LSD
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

yep there is another post on here about that, sickin to be honnest with you to see what this country is comming to

i said it a million times and will keep saying it even if we turn to a socialist govenment

you asked for it you got it OBAMA
89RS_82Z is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:25 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
V6canvas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Middle of MI
Posts: 756
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Stock LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by daveb123
Yeah, that's what is so ironic & stupid about this program- the cars have to be licensed, insured and inspected for one year, meaning they have passed the emissions test within the last year- The car I started this thread about had a shiny new cat in it's exhaust! We are junking clean cars!
Don't be so surprised, I'm just glad that it only goes back (I think) 20 years, so 60s-70s classics are safe. I work at a dealer, and while we haven't gotten anything like that, we have had a nice mid-late 90s Cherokee that would be an awesome off roader, if not a dd. There is a few explorers, a towncar (less than 10yrs old) a conversion van and a Durango. Granted, most of what we have had in I will not shed a tear over, I'm surprised about the Towncar and upset about the Jeep.

I believe that the oil needs to be drained, then some sort of epoxy and/or silica mixture (sand) poured into the motor and they let it run til it seizes.

What you might be able to do is intercept the car at the junk yard, after they receive it, but before they start cutting into it, then you can do a sweet LS1 swap!!!! This way you can save a good body, and the gov can have their pound of meat.

Last edited by V6canvas; 07-27-2009 at 09:29 PM.
V6canvas is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:39 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
L695speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Andover, NJ
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Well early third gens are safe. 84s are 25 so they don't count in the list of cash for clunkers. As for the rest, if they have a mpg of 18 or better on the combined then they are safe as well. There was an article on the program and they said Hummers can't be crushed....hmmm something is wrong with this picture.
L695speed is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:45 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
Frozer!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago(DP)
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 non posi
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Wow, this is definantly depressing
Frozer!!! is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:49 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
TADailyDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Theres no saving the car unfortunetly... I work at GM dealership as a mechanic and our G.M told us that any clunker we get in we have to drain the oil, add an acid additve and run the motor till it seizes. then push it outside to the back lot to be towed away... Then its up the junkyard/scrap yard what happens to it.
TADailyDriver is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:56 PM
  #20  
Member

 
Red90IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Commerce MI
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: 5L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

I'm not much concerned about the program. The "good" 3gens will be worth more than the voucher value, and will just be sold by the owner to another person in the open market instead. The rusted-out, dented up old "junky" 3gens that owners want to put into the program most likely wouldn't be much of a good source of parts anyway, if a yard had tried to part one out. If anything, this program might increase the value of the well-kept and/or pretty much clean 3gens still out there.
Red90IROC is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 11:07 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
injdinjn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I won't tell either
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Grand Prix TPI
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 200 4R
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

they cant just take classic cars and crush them
What is a classic car.
Just like garage sales, one persons junk is another persons treasure.

Ford guys have no use for GMs so GMs are junk to them.
Many people only drive cars, and an old car is just that an old car.

And many times I and others have said, our BS CA rules will go nationwide and here's your sign. "I SHOULD HAVE WRITTEN MY CONGRESSMAN".
injdinjn is offline  
Old 07-27-2009, 11:30 PM
  #22  
Member

Thread Starter
 
daveb123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: BW T-10
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Red90IROC
I'm not much concerned about the program. The "good" 3gens will be worth more than the voucher value, and will just be sold by the owner to another person in the open market instead. The rusted-out, dented up old "junky" 3gens that owners want to put into the program most likely wouldn't be much of a good source of parts anyway, if a yard had tried to part one out. If anything, this program might increase the value of the well-kept and/or pretty much clean 3gens still out there.

Not that I want to dispute you, but the car I started this thread about is a L98 IROC G92 car. According to the Camaro white book. it is one of 1426-a pretty rare car I would not consider "junky"
daveb123 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 12:11 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
LFN AT U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Crete, IL 60417
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2004 Chevy Avalanche
Engine: Some that run, some that don't
Transmission: 700R4's, a T-5, and a Turbo 350
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Want to know what's even worse. OUR tax dollars were used to buy that car. We paid $3000 to $4000 for that car and sold it to a junkyard for what...maybe around $100??? Our country is broke and having to borrow money and now the government thinks it's a good idea to buy thousands of cars and sell them at a $3000 to $4000 LOSS!!! Brilliant!!!

Ideas like this mean only one thing...buckle up because it's going to get a LOT worse!!!
LFN AT U is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 12:51 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
86WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, Bryson City North Carolina
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86WS6 30K and 82WS7 24K
Engine: 86:305 TPI, 82: 305 LG4
Transmission: 86:700R4, 82: T200C
Axle/Gears: 86:3:27 9 bolt, 82: 3:23 10 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

That's sad to just scrap a running G92 Iroc. That's enough to make any F-body person ill. A co-worker of mine is trading a nice clean original 91 F150 Supercab 4x4, 351with a manual trans truck for the cash for clunkers program and getting $4500.00 towards a new Toyota truck. Before you laugh, if it can happen to a Ford, it can also happen to a Chevy or a GMC. It's already happened to the one IROC, and there will certainly be more thirdgens and maybe some fourthgens lost also. The point is that we are going to loose a lot of potental classics, and future parts to keep other classics running before this program expires. I hope his new Toyota is a Lemon!
86WS6 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 01:13 AM
  #25  
Member
 
LB9Iroc87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Owensboro, Ky
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23, G80, J65 disc
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

AHHHHHH, they think they're really gettin somewere with this when most of the people trading there cars in are trading AMERICAN cars in and buying imports, i hope this turns around and bites the government in the A$$. But the deal is the car you buy has to get 10mpg or better then the one your trading in for it to qualify for C4C and the dealership HAS to crush the motor and transmission but the junkyards are allowed to keep the rest of the car for parts.
LB9Iroc87 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 06:45 AM
  #26  
Junior Member

 
Coupe Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 SC Convertible
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

It should be used for American cars only!! Its our American tax dollars used in this government program. The whole program sucks. It will eventually cause used parts from the bone yard to become hard to find and expensive. Maybe someone will buy a mitsubishi or toyota.
Coupe Guy is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:47 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
K-slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91' Firebird
Engine: 3.1 LH0 V6
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

YEAH! No C4C deals if your buying a Toyota, Honda, Kia, or any other asian POS.
I know the guys at junkyards by my house. If they got a decent running Iroc in they'd find a way save it and sell it, no point in scrapping a perfectly good sports car.
K-slice is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 11:31 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
quickkris2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: jackson new jersey
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 camaro vert
Engine: ls1 soon
Transmission: t56 soon
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt 4.10 soon!
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Timinsk
STEAL IT there must be a way to save it!!!
i got a slim jim wheres it at lol jk
quickkris2006 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 01:01 PM
  #29  
Member

Thread Starter
 
daveb123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: BW T-10
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Here's a coupla pics.
Attached Thumbnails Stupid Cash for Clunkers!-photo-0136a.jpg   Stupid Cash for Clunkers!-photo-0137a.jpg  
daveb123 is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 03:37 PM
  #30  
Former Sponsor
 
1Aauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Westford, MA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Can't believe someone traded that in on the program.84's the cut off thank god.The program is targeted at stuff like SUVs and such,but I'm sure a few Camaros,Grand Nationals,and Mustangs will get crushed allong the way.

We thank you guys for buying resto parts and keeping these cars on the road.

T
1Aauto is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:01 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
89RS_82Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairhope, AL
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89RS(other cars & pics in vBgarage)
Engine: LO3, 305 TBI Mildly Modified
Transmission: BakerBuilt 700R4 w/B&M Megashifter
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Auburn Pro Series LSD
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

dang that car looked good to
89RS_82Z is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:21 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
TheMonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Forged 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

All I can say is wow to the government, and to that person. All C4C is doing is getting stupid people that have american cars to sell them and to buy new imports. How does that help the economy??
TheMonster is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:40 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

 
injdinjn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I won't tell either
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1986 Grand Prix TPI
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 200 4R
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

LB9Iroc87 read the C4C rules,

As one commentator put it, C4C is just a welfare program for new car makers.

And yes we are paying for it.

They could not make it buy american only with all the foreign car assembly plants in the USA. Even mentioning it in some context Canada got really pi$$ed off.

Crushing these cars will make late 3rd gen and 4th gen parts few and far between, actually all vehicles 85 and newer.
injdinjn is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 06:20 PM
  #34  
TA
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by daveb123
Not that I want to dispute you, but the car I started this thread about is a L98 IROC G92 car. According to the Camaro white book. it is one of 1426-a pretty rare car I would not consider "junky"
Someone F'd up, that car does NOT qualify under the rules. It has to be EPA rated at 18 MPG combined (average city/hwy) to qualify. The EPA Rating on that car is 16city/24Hwy Divided by 2 = 20 combined.

Again, that car does NOT qualify. If you really want to save that car, call the EPA and raise holy hell that the dealerships are accepting cars that do not qualify. This is not debatable, these laws are based specifically on EPA mileage. None of the TPI 5.0 cars qualify either, they get slightly better mileage.

TA
TA is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 06:45 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
80schild's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Atmore, Alabama
Posts: 1,190
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:27 BW 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Maybe the car could be bought from the junkyard as "junk", and then retitled with a salvage title?
80schild is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 06:47 PM
  #36  
Member
 
Guy In A 90 RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6 MFI
Transmission: MD8 Hydra-Matic 4L60
Axle/Gears: Standard/3.23
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Next time you see that IROC, it'll be a damn Corolla. It pisses me off when a seemingly decent car gets wasted. And that Camaro looks better then mine.

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:47 AM. Reason: Do not violate language filters!!!
Guy In A 90 RS is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 07:08 PM
  #37  
Moderator

iTrader: (6)
 
AmorgetRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,645
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by TA
Someone F'd up, that car does NOT qualify under the rules. It has to be EPA rated at 18 MPG combined (average city/hwy) to qualify. The EPA Rating on that car is 16city/24Hwy Divided by 2 = 20 combined.

Again, that car does NOT qualify. If you really want to save that car, call the EPA and raise holy hell that the dealerships are accepting cars that do not qualify. This is not debatable, these laws are based specifically on EPA mileage. None of the TPI 5.0 cars qualify either, they get slightly better mileage.

TA
No, it does qualify. It sucks, but it does. See attachment
Attached Thumbnails Stupid Cash for Clunkers!-cars.png  
AmorgetRS is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 07:17 PM
  #38  
Pew
Member

 
Pew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: montgomery PA
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 90 camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: t10
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.88's
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Kevman
Cash for clunkers does do one good thing....

Brings the value of mine up
Pew is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 07:30 PM
  #39  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by Guy In A 90 RS
Next time you see that IROC, it'll be a damn Corolla. It pisses me off when a seemingly decent car gets wasted. And that Camaro looks better then mine.
Why not? The Dodge Daytona was a IROC. Domestic but still.....



http://www.stangbangers.com/93_Dodge...RT_Article.htm

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:48 AM. Reason: Edited quote for language
Stephen is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:00 PM
  #40  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by TA
Someone F'd up, that car does NOT qualify under the rules. It has to be EPA rated at 18 MPG combined (average city/hwy) to qualify. The EPA Rating on that car is 16city/24Hwy Divided by 2 = 20 combined.

Again, that car does NOT qualify. If you really want to save that car, call the EPA and raise holy hell that the dealerships are accepting cars that do not qualify. This is not debatable, these laws are based specifically on EPA mileage. None of the TPI 5.0 cars qualify either, they get slightly better mileage.

TA
All of them qualify. Even some of the V6 cars qualify. These laws are based specifically on the REVISED EPA mileage, listed at www.fueleconomy.gov
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008c...ef.jsp?id=5332
Note it says 15city/23highway

The "combined" rating is 55% city/45% highway, not (a+b)/2, so using the new 15/23 and 55%/45%.... you get... 18 combined.
 
Old 07-28-2009, 08:54 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
V6F1R3BRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird - 1998 Z28
Engine: 2.8 - LS1
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

This is not gonna fly. There are WAY to many car people out there that will let theirs go. He11 if I'll ever let them take any car of mine away.

Our country is doomed

And if the car is being junked, Why does it have to be in running order to trade in? lol

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:49 AM. Reason: Removed political opinion
V6F1R3BRD is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:01 PM
  #42  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Stevolwevol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,697
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 IROC Z, 92 RS
Engine: 305 4bbl, 305 TBI
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

P1010086.JPG

My 92 RS is probably worth a little under 4k, so I could make more doing the "cash for clunkers" deal, but it would be a shameful thing to do if you ask me!
Attached Thumbnails Stupid Cash for Clunkers!-p1010086.jpg  

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:50 AM. Reason: Violated the language filters!!!
Stevolwevol is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:04 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
V6F1R3BRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird - 1998 Z28
Engine: 2.8 - LS1
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

And this is why I love my v6. Take that v6 haters! lol jk

Engine Size 2.8 L Cylinders 6 Transmission Automatic 4-spd Drive Rear-Wheel Drive Options (FFS) Vehicle Category Passenger Car Combined MPG 20

Qualifies for CARS?

No. Your trade-in must have a Combined MPG rating of 18 MPG or less to qualify.
V6F1R3BRD is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:12 PM
  #44  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by V6canvas
Don't be so surprised, I'm just glad that it only goes back (I think) 20 years, so 60s-70s classics are safe. I work at a dealer, and while we haven't gotten anything like that, we have had a nice mid-late 90s Cherokee that would be an awesome off roader, if not a dd. There is a few explorers, a towncar (less than 10yrs old) a conversion van and a Durango. Granted, most of what we have had in I will not shed a tear over, I'm surprised about the Towncar and upset about the Jeep.

I believe that the oil needs to be drained, then some sort of epoxy and/or silica mixture (sand) poured into the motor and they let it run til it seizes.

What you might be able to do is intercept the car at the junk yard, after they receive it, but before they start cutting into it, then you can do a sweet LS1 swap!!!! This way you can save a good body, and the gov can have their pound of meat.
Oh my GOD... I kid you not... I shuddered and felt nauseous when I read your second paragraph. It's like a **** concentration camp... for cars!

But I couldn't have felt more pissed off when I read about that black IROC that got scrapped.. 2010... here we come.

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:51 AM. Reason: Removed political opinion
musclecar70sfan is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:21 PM
  #45  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by daveb123
Here's a coupla pics.
What?! That guy couldn't have possibly been stupid enough to junk that thing for 4 grand. There must've been something wrong with it. Maybe the engine/tranny were on their way out or the bottom of the unibody was rusting out?
musclecar70sfan is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:23 PM
  #46  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Stevolwevol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,697
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 IROC Z, 92 RS
Engine: 305 4bbl, 305 TBI
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

I regretfully will have to conseed that both of my cars wouldn't qualify for "clunkers" then since they get better than 16 mpg. Stock 305's are rated higher than this. I forgot what the mpg specs are exactly. Anybody know what the l98 iroc mpg is?
Stevolwevol is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:42 PM
  #47  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Sorry, but every 305 in the years in question qualifies by the mileage rating. I dont know how people dont get that. Go to www.fueleconomy.gov, look up your car. The "revised" combined EPA rating listed there is what they go by. Every V8 thirdgen from 1984 to 1992 has 18 or less combined MPG, making every one of them qualify. Seems like all the V6 M5 cars do as well.
 
Old 07-28-2009, 09:43 PM
  #48  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
V6canvas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Middle of MI
Posts: 756
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Stock LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan
Oh my GOD... I kid you not... I shuddered and felt nauseous when I read your second paragraph. It's like a **** concentration camp... for cars!

But I couldn't have felt more pissed off when I read about that black IROC that got scrapped.. 2010... here we come.
Yea, we have had about 8 or 9 cars in so far. I think 4 or 5 Exploders, a windstar, Continental, E350 conversion van, durango, VERY new looking Volvo wagon, at most 4 yrs old, a couple jeeps.

We dont have the "kill a car" stuff in yet (should have it tommorw), so the used car tech pulled in each one, drained the oil, and pulled them back out to the far end of the lot. Surprisingly all of them had no problem with that, some even registered oil pressure still, only tried to kill 2 cars, the Lincoln and a 4.0 exploder. the continental no longer runs, the exploder didn't, but makes bad noises.

I'd say 3 of these car were kinda crappy, but none were clapped out jalapies. I think we're going to be pulling some spare parts from these things (fuses etc, like to get the fuel out, but nowhere to store it. 1 had a full tank!!).

Oh, FYI, only the engines are being scrapped, and they are only getting siezed, so all the rest of the car, including external engine parts should be available from the junk yead. Down side is, once the VIN gets put into the C4C database, it can never be registered again. so my LS1 swap idea will only work if you don't plan on registering it. That might make it hard to put a plate on it, cops tend to pick up on these things.

Last edited by scottmoyer; 07-29-2009 at 07:54 AM. Reason: edited quote for political opinion
V6canvas is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:47 PM
  #49  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Stevolwevol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,697
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 IROC Z, 92 RS
Engine: 305 4bbl, 305 TBI
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

Gotta be a way around it. Take the vin off a real clunker and put it on the nice one. Man, I should run a chop shop..
Stevolwevol is offline  
Old 07-28-2009, 09:58 PM
  #50  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
V6canvas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Middle of MI
Posts: 756
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Stock LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt
Re: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!

I won't tell
V6canvas is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Stupid Cash for Clunkers!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.