LT1 heads on an L98
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Yes, it's possible but not without modifications. It has to be machined to fit. Here's an article I got from a fellow member.
http://www.lt1intake.com/LT1_retrofit.htm
http://www.lt1intake.com/LT1_retrofit.htm
#4
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
It can & will work. I found a clean set of 95' LT1 heads for a song. Armed w/ only that article John has posted a link to - I had a local machinist friend do the conversion. It set me back a whopping $125. While some may argue that the ends might not justify the means... these heads went on a mild 357" motor w/ an LT1 intake. I have about $500 total in the heads... where can you get a practically "new" set of aluminum heads for $500?
This is what I invested as follows:
Used LT1 heads - $100
Conversion work - $125
3 angle valve job, mild bowl work, new seals - $303
This is what I invested as follows:
Used LT1 heads - $100
Conversion work - $125
3 angle valve job, mild bowl work, new seals - $303
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
You still need a hole for the distributor and outlets for water. Check the article out - they plug off the LT1 speciffic water passages and add a tube to route the water like a Pre-LT1 SBC head.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T-56
These heads make great power on the LT1 cars when ported. I think if I find a cheap set I might go for this.
86 Iroc: Did the heads increase power for you? Any track times or dyno or anything?
86 Iroc: Did the heads increase power for you? Any track times or dyno or anything?
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
I don't have any results yet - the motor in question is in a state of limbo right now... I am selling the car that it was intended for. The heads & intake I bought came off of a good friend's 95' Z28 A4 car. W/ 245/50-16 Nitto DR's, a cut out, crank pulley, and a few free mods his car ran consistent 13.50's @ 101+. The motor I have has a bigger cam, roller rockers, 52mm TB, adj. FPR, & no doubt will blow through LT headers and true duals vs. LT1 manifolds & a stock exhaust. I chose these heads because I was able to do it on a budget, $100 here, another $125 there... you get the picture. It was either use the LT1's... or dump money into some iron L98 heads I have. The stock LT1's had an adequate valve spring for the cam I'm running, and to my fortune - they all tested out good when checked by the machine shop.
#10
John - do you have a machinist over near you that could modify a set of LT1 heads for me for about the same thing it cost 86 Iroc??
I just might be able to get a set from a friend off his blown motor for a song. (I just sold him a running LT1 for $700.00 so he owes me a deal.) I'd always heard this could be done, but figured it would cost a fortune, or that my local machinist either couldn't or wouldn't tackle it.
I just might be able to get a set from a friend off his blown motor for a song. (I just sold him a running LT1 for $700.00 so he owes me a deal.) I'd always heard this could be done, but figured it would cost a fortune, or that my local machinist either couldn't or wouldn't tackle it.
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
89Formula350WS6 - If you want, I will talk to Dan, the machinist. If he is interested in doing another set, I will privately email you his home # and the best times to reach him. Dan is the inventor of the C4 to flathead adapter, he created it while working for Challenger Equipment in California. As long as I've known Dan through my father - he's always had something off the wall being built in his shop. The guy is a whiz.
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Shakopee, Mn
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: T5
Well looks like I shot myself in the foot. This is great I am looking into a set of heads for my new motor and I think that I just found what I am going to be doing if I can find someone around here to do the conversion.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Are all of the LT1 heads aluminum? I thought that some of them were iron.
Was that $125 price for the head conversion a "favor" to you or is that what others should expect as far as amount of time and work needed to do the conversion.
Thanks
Was that $125 price for the head conversion a "favor" to you or is that what others should expect as far as amount of time and work needed to do the conversion.
Thanks
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
That $125 price wasn't a favor - but I'm sure it helps that I have known him for almost 20 years. You are correct about the heads - B body's got cast LT1 heads, and Y & F cars got aluminum LT1's. I was told by a few LT1 guys that I should avoid 92' & 93 castings.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Well since the LT1 intake ports line up to l98 heads I assume that you could use the TPI on LT1 heads that have been modified to the early style.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by 89Formula350WS6
John - do you have a machinist over near you that could modify a set of LT1 heads for me for about the same thing it cost 86 Iroc??
,,,,,,,,.
John - do you have a machinist over near you that could modify a set of LT1 heads for me for about the same thing it cost 86 Iroc??
,,,,,,,,.
#22
Thanks for the reply John.
86 Iroc, I'd be interested in the conversion if you can get me some more info on the cost involved if I have a set of good used heads.
Omega, You can find those flow numbers at Chevy High Performance's web site under the "Flow To Go" article.
Maybe one of the most useful series of articles ever written. You've gotta love that they put the specs online for the world to see even if you aren't a subscriber.
86 Iroc, I'd be interested in the conversion if you can get me some more info on the cost involved if I have a set of good used heads.
Omega, You can find those flow numbers at Chevy High Performance's web site under the "Flow To Go" article.
Maybe one of the most useful series of articles ever written. You've gotta love that they put the specs online for the world to see even if you aren't a subscriber.
#23
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's
89Formula350WS6 - I've got a call in to dan for m23haz. Dan said he'd have to get back to me in a few weeks because he is super busy w/ x-mas and his family. I don't want to push him or he won't want to do them. So, I'm going to let him take his time getting back to me about it and see what he says. I'm pretty sure he'll do them... but it's going to be on his terms and most likely not until next year when the holidays are over.
#26
Not to confuse the issue even more, but the iron heads actually flow better in stock form (as cast) than the aluminum heads on the intake side, and are fairly close on the exhaust side. Iron heads are easier to work with (IMO) and can probably be acquired for less cash outlay than their aluminum counterparts.
I did some bowl, runner, and radius work on my '94 iron heads when the 2.02/1.60 valves were installed, and noticed an immediate increase in pull to a much higher RPM. The intake runners were increased from an average of 174cc to 196cc, and the exhust runners were opened from 68cc to 76cc. Compression was bumped to 10.6 from the larger valves being installed deeper by 0.010" (1.770" installed height). With a few little associated changes to enhance the package (cam, springs, exhaust, intake porting, etc.), the RW HP/TQ went from 256/328 to 378/455. Not bad for a little home porting and some "lame" iron heads, huh? Of course, the aluminum heads probably would have been a LOT better, or at least that's the standard assumption.
I did some bowl, runner, and radius work on my '94 iron heads when the 2.02/1.60 valves were installed, and noticed an immediate increase in pull to a much higher RPM. The intake runners were increased from an average of 174cc to 196cc, and the exhust runners were opened from 68cc to 76cc. Compression was bumped to 10.6 from the larger valves being installed deeper by 0.010" (1.770" installed height). With a few little associated changes to enhance the package (cam, springs, exhaust, intake porting, etc.), the RW HP/TQ went from 256/328 to 378/455. Not bad for a little home porting and some "lame" iron heads, huh? Of course, the aluminum heads probably would have been a LOT better, or at least that's the standard assumption.
#27
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: helldon, fl
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 trans am GTA
Engine: tesla permanent magnet
Transmission: 93 T-56
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt w/ 3.73
i've got a set of ported '96 vette heads with gmpp springs guide plates and all sitting in a box in the dining room, i been sayung i'm going to put them on my '94Z but i still cant locate the motor when i pop the hood
picked them up for under 600 bones.... ot bad for a set of clean worked up heads.
picked them up for under 600 bones.... ot bad for a set of clean worked up heads.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (L98)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.45
That would mean that the LT1 intake would not match up with the head ports then right? Anyone absolutly sure that they will not line up? Maybe some work on the base manifold.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by Maroon-IROC-Z
That would mean that the LT1 intake would not match up with the head ports then right? Anyone absolutly sure that they will not line up? Maybe some work on the base manifold.
That would mean that the LT1 intake would not match up with the head ports then right? Anyone absolutly sure that they will not line up? Maybe some work on the base manifold.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
I think I read that there is a problem with the accessory holes in
the ends of the heads. Like one of the holes is missing or in a
different location or something. Is there any truth to that?
the ends of the heads. Like one of the holes is missing or in a
different location or something. Is there any truth to that?
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Here is a shot of the 1989 head. The water passages at the ends
of the head appear to be about the same as the passages on the
LT1 heads that the guy in the article blocked off.
If this is the case then I would not worry about them.
of the head appear to be about the same as the passages on the
LT1 heads that the guy in the article blocked off.
If this is the case then I would not worry about them.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
One thing I notice missing from the LT1 heads are the oil return
holes. How do they get the oil drained from the top of the head?
On the picture above they are the holes just below the water
passages on either end of the head.
holes. How do they get the oil drained from the top of the head?
On the picture above they are the holes just below the water
passages on either end of the head.
Last edited by Swapmaster; 12-19-2002 at 04:36 PM.
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
courtsey of Ebay..
It looks like the passage on the LT1 at the corners will need a sleeve to pass water to the intake, but other than that, it looks the same.
It looks like the passage on the LT1 at the corners will need a sleeve to pass water to the intake, but other than that, it looks the same.
Last edited by SATURN5; 12-20-2002 at 01:53 PM.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Here is a closer shot. The opening above the water passage is
the oil drainback hole. This is the only mismatch I see. You could
either have the passages in the heads welded shut or have
material welded to the block in those corners to seal it up.
the oil drainback hole. This is the only mismatch I see. You could
either have the passages in the heads welded shut or have
material welded to the block in those corners to seal it up.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
As far as getting coolant back out of the engine, I am thinking
instead of having coolant outlets put into the LT1 intake and
drilling and putting sleeves into the heads to match, why not
put our outlets in the back of the heads where they have the
plugs going into the water jackets. Just run your hoses from the
back of the heads to the remote thermostat housing. Then all
you would have to do is have the LT1 intake modified for the
distributor.
instead of having coolant outlets put into the LT1 intake and
drilling and putting sleeves into the heads to match, why not
put our outlets in the back of the heads where they have the
plugs going into the water jackets. Just run your hoses from the
back of the heads to the remote thermostat housing. Then all
you would have to do is have the LT1 intake modified for the
distributor.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by Swapmaster
I know the LT1 pulls coolant out through the water pump but
where does the coolant enter the engine at?
I know the LT1 pulls coolant out through the water pump but
where does the coolant enter the engine at?
The thermostat controls the incoming of water. The lower radiator hose goes from the PS tank in the radiator and flows water to the water pump in a normal position.
The upper radiator hose goes from the water pump to the DS tank in the radiator.
To answer your question, water goes into the engine at the block, and turns 90 degrees to go directly to the heads.
Matthew
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by Swapmaster
As far as getting coolant back out of the engine, I am thinking
instead of having coolant outlets put into the LT1 intake and
drilling and putting sleeves into the heads to match, why not
put our outlets in the back of the heads where they have the
plugs going into the water jackets. Just run your hoses from the
back of the heads to the remote thermostat housing. Then all
you would have to do is have the LT1 intake modified for the
distributor.
As far as getting coolant back out of the engine, I am thinking
instead of having coolant outlets put into the LT1 intake and
drilling and putting sleeves into the heads to match, why not
put our outlets in the back of the heads where they have the
plugs going into the water jackets. Just run your hoses from the
back of the heads to the remote thermostat housing. Then all
you would have to do is have the LT1 intake modified for the
distributor.
If you're talking about Gen II LT1 heads on a Gen I block, that would work. Accessories would have to be clear of it, which is obstacle numero uno. You'd have to thermostat control the water coming out of the heads, which is obstacle numero dos; not a big deal though.
#46
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T-56
So in addition to doing what the article says I would also have to fill those holes that overlap in the picture? What if those holes werent filled in, what would happen?
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by m23haz
So in addition to doing what the article says I would also have to fill those holes that overlap in the picture? What if those holes werent filled in, what would happen?
So in addition to doing what the article says I would also have to fill those holes that overlap in the picture? What if those holes werent filled in, what would happen?
The modifications in the article take care of the holes. The plugs that are pressed into the face of the head will cover the holes. The 3/16th hole thats drilled into the plug is the water passage. To use a standard intake the intake port side of the head will need modifed per the article. Using a LT1 intake may provide a different option.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
The idea I have is to use the LT1 heads and intake together.
Weld the coolant passages in the heads and drill the new 3/16th
hole as the article states. Only do the distributor modification to
the intake manifold. This will bolt the heads and intake to the
L98 block and mount the distributor.
The next issue is creating a way to get the coolant out of the
engine and to a remote thermostat housing as with a standard
LT1 intake swap. I think the most logical way to do this is to use
the hole that is already provided in the end of the head which
has the plug in it. Drill and tap it for a 3/4" NPT nipple and screw
nipples into them to route 3/4" heater hoses to the remote
thermostat housing with the outles in the head at the back of the
engine of course.
Presto, you now have Gen II LT1 heads and intake on your L98
engine.
The cast iron version heads from a Caprice that Vader taked
about flow 230fm on the intake and 147cfm on the exhaust
at .500" lift. I don't know if these numbers are actual but are the
only numbers I could find on this head. The aluminum version from
a Camaro flow 213cfm on the intake and 142cfm on the exhaust.
So as Vader states, the cast version outflows the aluminum heads
quite a bit. The cast heads have a cast# of 10125320 and were
used on 94-96 Caprice, Roadmaster and Fleetwood cars.
I checked availability and found them all over the country in
salvage yards. I ordered a cast iron pair today from a yard in
Missouri for $150 to speculate with. I figure that if this works, it
will be a low cost head and intake setup that most anyone can
afford to do.
Does anyone see any problems with this idea?
Weld the coolant passages in the heads and drill the new 3/16th
hole as the article states. Only do the distributor modification to
the intake manifold. This will bolt the heads and intake to the
L98 block and mount the distributor.
The next issue is creating a way to get the coolant out of the
engine and to a remote thermostat housing as with a standard
LT1 intake swap. I think the most logical way to do this is to use
the hole that is already provided in the end of the head which
has the plug in it. Drill and tap it for a 3/4" NPT nipple and screw
nipples into them to route 3/4" heater hoses to the remote
thermostat housing with the outles in the head at the back of the
engine of course.
Presto, you now have Gen II LT1 heads and intake on your L98
engine.
The cast iron version heads from a Caprice that Vader taked
about flow 230fm on the intake and 147cfm on the exhaust
at .500" lift. I don't know if these numbers are actual but are the
only numbers I could find on this head. The aluminum version from
a Camaro flow 213cfm on the intake and 142cfm on the exhaust.
So as Vader states, the cast version outflows the aluminum heads
quite a bit. The cast heads have a cast# of 10125320 and were
used on 94-96 Caprice, Roadmaster and Fleetwood cars.
I checked availability and found them all over the country in
salvage yards. I ordered a cast iron pair today from a yard in
Missouri for $150 to speculate with. I figure that if this works, it
will be a low cost head and intake setup that most anyone can
afford to do.
Does anyone see any problems with this idea?
Last edited by Swapmaster; 12-21-2002 at 01:10 AM.
#49
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: T-56
So when you do the swap you use L98 head gaskets not the LT1 right?
Swapmaster: Why not just modify the heads for that coolant sleeve like in the article and then get the Lt1 intake modified for the coolant passages like John does to save you the trouble of figuring out how to run stuff without the modifications? It would then match up perfectly and you dont have to worry about running the lines out of the back of the heads.
Swapmaster: Why not just modify the heads for that coolant sleeve like in the article and then get the Lt1 intake modified for the coolant passages like John does to save you the trouble of figuring out how to run stuff without the modifications? It would then match up perfectly and you dont have to worry about running the lines out of the back of the heads.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Yes, you would use the L98 head gaskets. I am looking for the
easiest way of doing this. The heads already have holes tapped
into the water jackets in the ends so why not use them. They may
already be big enough to screw a 90 degree nipple into them but
if not they can easily be drilled bigger for a 3/4" nipple. You could
even screw 90 degree 3/4" AN fittings onto them to use braided
lines so you would never have to worry about them.
Here is a pic of an LT1 intake gasket sitting on top of a Felpro
1205 gasket. The LT1 gasket will not support the use of a coolant
passage. The gasket is not wide enough to cover a coolant port if
one were added. So the outlets in the back of the heads are the
easiest way to go. Another note is the runner ports on the LT1
gasket match the Felpro 1205/Victor 95070 gasket perfectly.
easiest way of doing this. The heads already have holes tapped
into the water jackets in the ends so why not use them. They may
already be big enough to screw a 90 degree nipple into them but
if not they can easily be drilled bigger for a 3/4" nipple. You could
even screw 90 degree 3/4" AN fittings onto them to use braided
lines so you would never have to worry about them.
Here is a pic of an LT1 intake gasket sitting on top of a Felpro
1205 gasket. The LT1 gasket will not support the use of a coolant
passage. The gasket is not wide enough to cover a coolant port if
one were added. So the outlets in the back of the heads are the
easiest way to go. Another note is the runner ports on the LT1
gasket match the Felpro 1205/Victor 95070 gasket perfectly.