Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2002, 11:06 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
IROCFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SE of STL
Posts: 771
Car: 85 IROC/67 Camaro
Engine: 305/438" LSx
Transmission: Auto/T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/9"

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Needed Exhaust Size

Hey guys, I posted this on the exhaust board, but think you all should check it out also...according to this chart off of the Dynomax homepage a single 3in pipe is capable of supporting over 500hp...I actually called dynomax and asked them if it was accurate and they said yes. What do you all think?
Attached Images
File Type: gif powertech.gif (12.5 KB, 106 views)
__________________
85 IROC 65k
67 Camaro LSx/T56

www.ape-parts.com
IROCFAST is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2002, 03:56 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Yep, sort of…. Those numbers are based on a study that David Vizard did a few years ago. He figured that at some point most tracks will set noise standards and wanted to know how much flow you would need not to loose any performance. He found that above 2.2cfm/hp there was only a negligible restriction that was almost statistically insignificant. You couldn’t measure any change above 2.4cfm/hp.

He also found that the required flow drops as you go further back in the exhaust because the gasses cool and take up less volume, so the further back you mount the muffler the smaller it could be. The muffler only has to be that big if it is mounted right after the collector, and that you could make an exhaust that has sufficient flow behave exactly like open collectors if you build a ‘pressure wave terminator box’ (basically an expansion chamber) and mounted it at the end of the collectors and ran whatever exhaust out you wanted. This is somewhat the idea behind some of the funky designs coming out now by Magnaflow and a few others. You’ll see long, 3.5” collectors, a 3” x-pipe with 2.5” outlets and mufflers and then 2.25” tailpipes on a QUIET 600hp car… I did something like that on my truck a while back, the Y comes together into a 3”, and ends with a 2.25” tailpipe.
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2002, 12:07 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
IROCFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SE of STL
Posts: 771
Car: 85 IROC/67 Camaro
Engine: 305/438" LSx
Transmission: Auto/T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/9"

Classifieds Rating: (3)
this is an extremely interesting concept and really does make sense...so this actually works? I may be getting rid of my duals and making my own 3in y pipe, run the two 3in into an Expansion chamber (basically I think I would use a 4in, to 3in adapter,about where the cat used to be, oval it slightly so it would be about 3inx5in, make sure to make it as hollow as possible inside by cutting as much of the 3in back as I could, and run that into single 3in over the axle and into the Dynomax single 3in dual 3in out crossflow muffler, it flows over 1100 CFM).
__________________
85 IROC 65k
67 Camaro LSx/T56

www.ape-parts.com
IROCFAST is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2002, 12:17 PM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,877
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
The guys at mufflex told me they have a guy running the 4" with the offroad 3" Y pipe making just over 700 RWHP. I dont expect much over 500 with my 91 project.
__________________

WWW.OUTLAWPERFORMANCE.COM
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2002, 03:53 AM   #5
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
IROCFAST, if by 'expansion chamber' you mean a pressure wave terminator box, you should probably be aware of 2 things. First, the reason Vizard was playing with it is that he feels that most of the scavenging/HP increase available in an exaust system is in getting the collector length tuned and that playing with primaries is a wast of time. He was attempting to specifically tune the collectors with the terminator box. In your setup you'd have grossly different collector lengths, both of which would probably be too long for any usefull tuning. Second, he found that to be effective he needed 2 chambers roughly 8x the effective volume of a cylinder or greater (kinda big to fit under an f-body)
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2002, 09:02 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
IROCFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SE of STL
Posts: 771
Car: 85 IROC/67 Camaro
Engine: 305/438" LSx
Transmission: Auto/T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/9"

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Great information Crossfire...thanks
__________________
85 IROC 65k
67 Camaro LSx/T56

www.ape-parts.com
IROCFAST is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2002, 09:02 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
1991, 82, 86, 91, box, camaro, chamber, exhaust, expansion, pressure, put, size, sizing, terminator, wave
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details