Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2005, 11:50 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ElDorado,Arkansas
Posts: 127

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The real electric supercharger!!

After reading another post on bilge fans or what ever they are, trying to be passed off on e-bay as electric superchargers I thought I would dig out this old brochure I got back in 97 from GRAND Technologies Inc. I have a feeling they are out of buisness now as I have never seen anything from them since.Simply a turbo with an electric motor.The hard part is the motor I bet.
Click on the thumb for larger image



Last edited by Mike-91 Formula 350; 06-07-2005 at 12:02 AM.
Mike-91 Formula 350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 01:03 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 701

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
Aparantly they got in some kind of legal dispute with Turbodyne Technologies, and I guess Turbodyne Technologies must have come out on top because they're still here.

http://www.turbodyne.com/

I see a huge problem in that they don't describe how it works, which to me means it doesn't work, least very well. If they're trying to run the thing off a normal 12V charging system I can see why it probably wouldn't work.

At least they got the other end of the design right in that they just took a turbo compressor side and mounted it up, heh. I see this as a more legitimate idea than the stupid ebay fan types. They just need to give it some real power, maybe a triple battery pack like that roots style electric supercharger.

I'll just stick with my ancient exhaust driven impeller models, thank you.
__________________
'88 Fiero GT 3100 turbo
2010 Camaro 1LT/RS

Gone but never forgotten...
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/po...o-updates.html
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 04:31 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have built a prototype electic supercharger (also based on a turbo compressor- a T-73). It's in my basement, has been for 5 years and yes, it works. It'll probably push about 3 PSI into a small displacement V8. Many people who have been over my house for a carb rebuild or other work have seen it.

There is one main problem with the whole concept: it takes TONS AND TONS AND TONS of electrical energy to move enough air at a high enough boost pressure to make any kind of serious real-world performance improvement.

My system started out at 24V and then quickly jumped to 36V. Even then we're talking about pulling HUNDREDS of amps continuously at full song. There isn't enough energy in the entire car's electrical system to run it. You can use the alternator to recharge the batteries between blasts @ 12V but when it comes time to let 'er rip you have to hook them all up in series for 36V and then it'll drain them flat in no time when you fire it up.

There just isn't enough energy in a vehicle's electrical system to run such a supercharger for very long. Such a system would basically be like a nitrous system that never needs to have the bottle refilled. Short-burst use only.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 04:47 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 701

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
Exactly.

Have you actually tested it? Was that 36V just three 12V batteries in series? Just curious.
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2005, 03:57 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah, 3 big, fresh car batteries linked together with HUGE cables. I never put it on the car but did some testing through some cheap flow meters and using standard aftermarket boost gagues. While that doesn't necessarily correspond to what you'll see in the real world it was obvious that there was just no way to get such a setup to shove 6-8 PSI into a 350, let alone for any more than a handfull of seconds at a time.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 01:44 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 52

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Here's an idea....why not take a hint from Jeep owners?

personally im rather amazed this has never been attempted by a turbo companies R&D. There is a Jeep trick where they get larger AC compressors and through a few routes/tricks they turn it into an Air compressor that can refill large 4x4 tires.

Most can be run through the stock electrical system too. IMHO id think that would be a great place to start for *free* power.

if i had access to the resources id screw around with the idea myself...but i dont.
ZQ8Dude is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 04:38 PM   #7
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
An air compressor supplies relatively little air, there is no getting around how much energy it takes to move a specific amount of air at a certain pressure.
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 10:24 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,082
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Quick_Trans_Am
what if you had that air compressor that moved air in to a holding tank, and then triggered it like a nitrous setup? Do the plumbing and then you would kind of have boost only when you wanted it, then the compressor would recharge the holding tank as the car is driven...

Probably take some R&D to do that, as I highly doubt it would be an efficient setup, the compressor wouldn't be able to fill the tank fast enough if you wanted to make repetetive passes.


Haha sorry that thought just came to mind
Quick_Trans_Am is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2005, 11:58 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Skipping the math, for an engine making 500hp at the crank (about 400 at the wheels) will need a tank 2’ in diameter x 8’ long pressurized to 100psi to make a single dragstrip pass in a fairly light car.

So how much is a 2x8’ tank that will hold 100psi + compressor, plumbing, regulator and valves that will flow enough going to weigh? Any ideas of where to package it and how to keep something like that light?

FWIW, this is almost EXACLY the same as a large, upright industrial shop compressor with a 60-80gallon tank, but with much larger plumbing/valves. Ever try to move one of those? How long do you think it will take to fill with the compressor that you're thinking about using?
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 12:40 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 283
Car: 1985 z-28
Engine: 350ci
Transmission: 700-r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/0406tur_knight/

A real electric supercharger. I know Ive seen this sold in sport comp mags for a few years at least. Pretty pricey!!
tommy z-28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2005, 01:00 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Posts: 2,179
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping

Classifieds Rating: (0)
That thing costs around 1300$ for 5 pounds of boost. You could build your own turbo kit for less than that and be able to use it all the time.

People really need to put the crack pipe down and get off the electric supercharger/use an A/C compressor/leaf blower/etc kick. Compressing air requires energy, as any physics book will tell you. Superchargers get it from the crank, turbos get it from wasted exhaust energy. In order to get that energy from electricity, you're going to need to put it into the car first in the form of batteries to make it worth your while. And where is the energy going to come from? The alternator, which is run off the crank. So you're changing the energy from mechanical to electrical (losing efficiency and some energy), storing it (losing a little more energy), converting it *back* to mechanical (losing more efficiency and more energy) and you can only use it for a few minutes.

(End rant)
__________________
1990 Iroc-Z - L98, 700R4, 3.27
Ran 85% Ethanol fuel, converted back. For sale!
My E85 Conversion posts:
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/so...bor-day-2.html
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/south-west-region/337432-still-working-fuel-system.html

1931 Chevy 3-Window Coupe
1958 392 Hemi with 6-71 blower, Turbo 400, 9" Ford with 3.00 gears

2002 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
Synapsis is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 02:28 AM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 118
Car: 91' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 388 ci Small block CHEVY (4.060x3.75), Dart Iron Eagle Platinum 200cc, Performer intake, 454 TBI, Long Tubes, True Dual 3" GPs
Transmission: 700R4, B&M, Governer Recal, 20,000 GVW cooler

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'd give up both of my testicles if somebody invents free horsepower.




If I lose my testicles the apocalypse is upon us!
TWICEtheRICE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 04:21 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 749
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: 700R4 (MD8)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open (GU2)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by TWICEtheRICE
I'd give up both of my testicles if somebody invents free horsepower.




If I lose my testicles the apocalypse is upon us!
On an L03, simply take the stock air silencer off of the car, BLAM, free power.

Now hand 'em over
__________________
MikeDirntRulez is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 05:00 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
fireturd350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Boston, IL, USA
Posts: 2,812
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to fireturd350 Send a message via MSN to fireturd350 Send a message via Yahoo to fireturd350
Quote:
Originally posted by tommy z-28
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/0406tur_knight/

A real electric supercharger. I know Ive seen this sold in sport comp mags for a few years at least. Pretty pricey!!
From the looks of that it eats up batteries like crazy. Course that's not a bad thing if you can zap them back using a deep cycle over 350 times (optima yellow) before they go bad.

Another point is:
"T: What size engine will this work on?
TK: Testing has shown the smaller the engine, the higher the sustainable boost. If a 3.5-liter engine is running 24v, boost will peak at 10 psi at 2000 rpm and then drop off to 3 psi at 6500 rpm. "

So if it only makes 10 psi at 2k on a 3.5L, just imagine how much lower it would make on a 5.0L, 5.7L, or a 6.2L. LOL, it would be putting off no air fairly soon on our motors too. So you would end up with tons of added weight without gains.

Might be an interesting idea on smaller motors, but I see it working about the same as a leaf blower on ours since it won't be spinning fast enough to provide boost. Let alone if it's the roots type model, you would be choking the motor.
fireturd350 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 11:59 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 118
Car: 91' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 388 ci Small block CHEVY (4.060x3.75), Dart Iron Eagle Platinum 200cc, Performer intake, 454 TBI, Long Tubes, True Dual 3" GPs
Transmission: 700R4, B&M, Governer Recal, 20,000 GVW cooler

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeDirntRulez
On an L03, simply take the stock air silencer off of the car, BLAM, free power.

Now hand 'em over
No NO NO! That is just unleashing potential horsepower, thats a difference. So you cannot have my jewels
TWICEtheRICE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 12:32 AM   #16
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,920
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I don't understand why anyone would want an electric forced induction system. A turbo is using exhaust energy that is normally wasted. It really is the best horsepower/weight ratio power adder.

Electric means more batteries and weight. It also requires charging from a big source like a household plug.
Exhaust driven Turbos have been around for years because they are a good design. Better than a supercharger.....that is why they are used more on vehicles.
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 03:28 AM   #17
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Quote:
Originally posted by fireturd350
So if it only makes 10 psi at 2k on a 3.5L, just imagine how much lower it would make on a 5.0L, 5.7L, or a 6.2L. LOL, it would be putting off no air fairly soon on our motors too. So you would end up with tons of added weight without gains.

Might be an interesting idea on smaller motors, but I see it working about the same as a leaf blower on ours since it won't be spinning fast enough to provide boost. Let alone if it's the roots type model, you would be choking the motor.
Assuming the same VE, 7 psi on a 5.0. the real problem is if can’t give it more V at highr rpm’s, for example, even the 3.5 will only see about 3.3psi at 6000rpm at that same airflow….

Quote:
Originally posted by junkcltr
I don't understand why anyone would want an electric forced induction system. A turbo is using exhaust energy that is normally wasted. It really is the best horsepower/weight ratio power adder.

Electric means more batteries and weight. It also requires charging from a big source like a household plug.
Exhaust driven Turbos have been around for years because they are a good design. Better than a supercharger.....that is why they are used more on vehicles.
Exhaust turbine driven superchargers (turbine + supercharger = turbocharger) do draw the same amount of power, and it is lost in the form of an exhaust restriction that hurts the engine’s VE. And yes, you can compensate for that a little by changing cam timing, but that also hurts total power without boost VS the optimized cam for the NA package. There is no free lunch, it’s just a matter of where/how you want to pay for it.
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 03:28 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
electric, electronic, f150, ford, fordf150, make, moreno, nitrous, real, refill, roots, supercharger, superchargers, trans, valley
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details