Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2006, 12:20 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
What is everyones opinion on GN turbos

I have been kicking around the idea of using 2 Grand national turbos for my IROC's 356. I have researched a bit on a few GN forums and such really didnt find much on the stock turbo.

What I'm looking for is 2 turbos that push a 86 IROC into the 11's with 450-500HP to the wheels, Street manners are not really an issue. Mainly going to be a strip car, that can be run on the street, also will have a diet of 92+ octane.

Motor specs
356ci
Vortec iron heads (port matched to Stealth Ram)
Vortec Stealth Ram
TPiS TQ secrets cam .495/.495
Forged bottom end


Let me know some opinions on these turbos and what you think

Jason
__________________


86 IROC-Z---> 377ci Twin Turbo project is in the works

Exhaust Clips Click Here
Pictures and Progress on Cardomain
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 04:18 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,920
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Interesting. TPIS TQ secrets cam? You need to list the cam specs in order for people to figure out if those turbos will work. Strip car? why not just a big single?
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 07:58 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
700-135-Small block
Intake Exhaust
Advertised duration 280 280
Duration at .050 224 224
Gross lift .495 .495
Lobe separation 112

And I went with twins cause i thought they would be decent on the street. Thats the only reason...but I open for opinions

Jason
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 02:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE PA, USA
Posts: 758
Car: 89 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: Intercooled Twin Turbo L98
Transmission: Tremec TKO

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Here is a guy from turbomustangs.com running two GN turbos. Deep 10's at nearly 130mph. Very impressive IMO. Stock TPI intake with 20+ psi of boost!


LINK

FWIW, like jnkcltr stated a sungle will perform just as well or better on the street and track. Twins are cooler though...
__________________
'89 Twin Turbo IROC
'89 Turbo Cavalier Z24
www.khturbo.net

Last edited by 89JYturbo; 04-12-2006 at 02:43 PM.
89JYturbo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 07:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
Thats a cool link thanks man...I agree that twins are cooler.

I am buying these turbos soon so hopefully this project goes well!

Jason
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 03:02 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
a pair would be good for an easy 700hp or maybe a little more, and would be very streetable...
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 09:43 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
thats pretty much what i was looking for crossfire. Your basing those numbers off of the stock turbos right? That is what I bought so I hope so what is the benifit of using stainless over mild steel? I plan on using mild steel w/ 1 3/4 primarys into a 2 1/2(?) collector. I dont remember off hand what the inlet exhaust size is.

Jason
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 03:55 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 6,570
Car: 87TA 87Formula 97TA 04CumminsRam

Classifieds Rating: (2)
The stock ones on the cold air GN’s are basically a 60/.63 T3’s that have had the compressor housing machined for a larger compressor wheel that is almost identical to an S3 TO4B.

If you look at an S3 compressor map it tops out at around 37lb/min at a PR of 2:1, and almost 40 at 2.5…

2 will flow 2x that so it should get you to 700hp easy (really, if everything is matched up well it should move enough air to get close to 800hp), but real world a pair would be much happier with a combination making 500-600hp (these are crank numbers).

Doesn’t matter because you won’t need nearly that much to run 11’s. Your average, 3600lb f-body should need about 465hp at the crank to go 11.5

Stainless tends to be more durable and does not conduct heat as well, but also expands and contracts at almost 2x the rate of mild steel so depending on construction techniques can be more prone to cracking.

1-3/4” primaries are overkill… I’ve seen cars make 1000hp with all the exhaust flowing through a section that had the same cross section as a single 2.25” pipe. The inlets on those turbos has about the same cross section as a 2.25” pipe. I usually try to keep my primaries in the 1-1/2 – 1-5/8” range on a small block, of course I’m not a big fan of tubular headers on a turbo setup…
83 Crossfire TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 01:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
Wow interesting info one the turbo and headers. Thank you! So are you saying that you would go for more of a log style? I have a pair of hooker super comp shorties that I considered using for the build but the flanges are to small. I'll look into log headers. From what I have read it also seems that people sway towards tubular headers opposed to log style, whats the benefit?

Jason
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 10:59 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
FlamedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, Minnesota
Posts: 1,139
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: Vortec 356 TPI
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FlamedROC
Re: What is everyones opinion on GN turbos

Back from the dead what RPM should I expect these to make power to. Can't seem to find a compressor map...But I have since forgotten how to read one.

I am starting the slow ball rolling again with the recent purchase of a 377 chev. was previously a circle track motor

few specs

destroked 400
GMPP forged 350 crank
chrylser 6.125 (IIRC) rods
9.5 2 relief pistons (dont think they are anything special
splayed main caps
water ports blocked off and machined for vortec 350 heads

I am currently looking into 6.00" rods and am unsure on a decent piston. I have heard/ read that a bit higher compression ie 10:1 is good for a street car. But may play it safe and try 9.5:1. also I am ditching all efi and going to a blow through set-up. Also from alot of research it appears that although it is thought the 377 spins like crazy it really doesnt spin up that fast. more just brings the power band up in RPM losing low end torque. Personally the only racing a I do is a sunday once a month out at the track. I dont give dork the time of day on the street so how it preforms on the street I dont care.

Anyone know of a couple combinations that this particular setup may like?
__________________


86 IROC-Z---> 377ci Twin Turbo project is in the works

Exhaust Clips Click Here
Pictures and Progress on Cardomain
FlamedROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 05:16 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: chicago
Posts: 626

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: What is everyones opinion on GN turbos

Stainless steel is the best way to go with turbo setups . I used 304 on my setup. it cost more than rust prone mild steel but will save u in the long run.

If u look at all formula one , indy , nascar you`ll notice they all run tubular headers. you know why ,tubular headers holds heat in better.

primary size depends on the heads u are running. i run 1 7/8" on my single turbo with 3" crossover pipe. i think you be ok with 1 3/4" with vortec heads.

go back to EFI..... forget carbs in forced induction applications.
daverr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 07:13 AM   #12
Member
 
UR50SLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 195
Car: 86 Turbo Camaro
Engine: 427LSX
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9" 3:25

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: What is everyones opinion on GN turbos

83 CrossFire had alot of good information there...

You will care how well it behaves on the street... larger primary's will slow exhaust gas speed and slow down spool.

Each stock GN turbo flows 550cfm and supports 350hp.
A TA49 (Next step up) flows 800cfm and supports 550hp.

There is a 2-300 rpm diffrence in spool. (Higher) with the TA49.

Anyway... keep your primary's at 1 1/2inch to 1 5/8 max. 1 3/4 only in much larger hp.
Log or tubular isn't going to make much difference. Downpipes should be free flowing and 2.5" Minimum.
Tuning is 95% of any turbo car. Carbs are fine for WOT but suck everywhere else especially on the street. EFI is the key to making a good power depenable car that get's decent MPG.
~Scott
__________________
427 RHS block 98mm turbo 4L80E going back to a torque arm. In progress!
UR50SLO is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 07:11 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
grover85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Germany, MN
Posts: 870
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: Nothing
Transmission: Nothing
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt W/ 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to grover85
Re: What is everyones opinion on GN turbos

You should look on turbomustangs.com. There is a guy with a third gen trans am that was running GN turbos. The thread was titled "How long till it granades?". It was even in car craft.
__________________
1986 Iroc-z with bolt ons
grover85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 07:11 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
gn, headers, research, s3, special, to4b, tubular, turboair, turbos, whats
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details