Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2007, 10:33 AM   #1
Member
 
RiggsLW81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 141
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 350 (5.7L)
Transmission: 700R4 (Auto)

Classifieds Rating: (4)
is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Hey all.. I had my car at a shop that did a motor rebuild (knowing it was going to receive a vortec supercharger after the build). well, without getting into a big long story..the shop didn't know their a$$ from their elbow and I took my car to a shop that is competent and treated me like a human being..my concern is that I recently found out the compression ratio is around 9.25:1 being too high to run the supercharger (vortec V2 kit) and still use pump gas. The shop cleaning up the mess from the other shop is concerned about this and let me know. We concluded the only thing to do is move ahead with the build and see what how it runs once everyhting is bolted on. Just lokoing for thoughts, opinions, and any remedies you may offer since I know many of oyu are quite knowledgable. Thanks in advance...
__________________
1987 Blue IROC-Z

5.7L 350 TPI w/ 700R4 Tranny - MODS: Edelbrock Headers, 3" exhaust: Magnaflow cat to Flowmaster muffler, Accel 8.8 wires, subframe connectors, Edelbrock Panhard Bar, Stage 2 Shift-Kit, '97 Seats (front/back), Nordskog Digital Gauges
RiggsLW81 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 11:08 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Barrington, Il
Posts: 206
Car: 89 ws6
Engine: 355 afr195, hsr,gmpp cam, hs rr,
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Believe it or not you are a at a perfect compression ration fro a srteet engine to have a power adder. Just remember the stock compression ratio on third gen 350's is 9.3 to 1. You can safely run 8 to 10 lbs of boost as long as you have a nice tune. You can run more aggressively with forged components, aluminum heads, an aftermarket efi to help tuneit in as well. The difference with a much lower compression is that you have to run more boost in order to make up for the loss of compression. I don't see any problem as long as you have aduqate fuel to go along with it.
shocker89bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 02:32 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
trumps2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bloomingdale, NJ
Posts: 434
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5 5 Spd
Axle/Gears: Built 10bolt w/3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to trumps2000
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

I'd say you're probably limited to 4-5PSI. This is a link to Holley's Supercharger PDF, its for a root's blower, but I think its a good rule of thumb for boosted engines. Look at page 3 for effective compression.

http://www.holley.com/data/TechServi...ech%20Info.pdf
trumps2000 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 03:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
92droptopws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sin city(702crew)
Posts: 709
Car: 96z28,95z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 6spd
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (6)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

you will be fine with that comp.ratio.just please use an intercooler.it will really help.....
92droptopws6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 04:46 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 3,920
Engine: 305ci DIY twin T3 50 trim
Transmission: 199x DIY 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

It sounds like it is already built. I would just run it and then install an intercooler or water/alky spray later on if you want more boost. Play with timing.

In terms of compression at 9.25.............it doesn't really matter without additional info. No one can throw out a decent guess without out knowing quench, chamber shape, chamber finish, cam duration/overlap.
junkcltr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 06:30 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago il
Posts: 333
Car: 1987 transam
Engine: 383 /w superram
Transmission: 700r4 /w 2800rpm stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to level
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

if you don't intercool that car you're going to chunk a piston from knock or be limited to 4-5lbs of boost with 15/16 degrees of PE timing.
5lbs of boost is going to put you somewhere around 11:5.1 if not 12:1 and you'd have to run 13/12 degrees of timing to prevent knock.
IF you intercool you'll be able to run about 8/10lbs with 18/24 degrees of timing depending on how good your tune is.

my gtp is running 13lbs of boost but its on a 8:5.1 motor and thats really at the absolute limit considering I get burst knock every so often.
level is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 06:59 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 600 yds out
Posts: 1,520
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by level View Post
if you don't intercool that car you're going to chunk a piston from knock or be limited to 4-5lbs of boost with 15/16 degrees of PE timing.
5lbs of boost is going to put you somewhere around 11:5.1 if not 12:1 and you'd have to run 13/12 degrees of timing to prevent knock.
IF you intercool you'll be able to run about 8/10lbs with 18/24 degrees of timing depending on how good your tune is.

my gtp is running 13lbs of boost but its on a 8:5.1 motor and thats really at the absolute limit considering I get burst knock every so often.
My shortblock is 9.2:1 compression and I run 6 psi with 30° timing. Cast pistons and crank hasn't blown up yet and I've been running the snot out of it.

Just make sure your tune starts with very little timing and alot of fuel. Work up to it. Doing this will try your patients but it's well worth it.
__________________
'96 Bronco: 302, 5-spd, 4wd, 32" tires
'84 Impala: 350 with Dart heads 200cc IR 72cc CC, Ferrea valves, 9.3:1 compression zero clearanced, Comp 276HR cam, 1.52 Pro Mag roller rockers, ported Torker II + 1" spacer, DIY 4bbl TBI, 95#/hr injectors, single GT45 turbo, boxed control arms holding a GM 8.5" G80 with 4.10's
V8Astro Captain is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 11:16 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago il
Posts: 333
Car: 1987 transam
Engine: 383 /w superram
Transmission: 700r4 /w 2800rpm stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to level
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Astro Captain View Post
My shortblock is 9.2:1 compression and I run 6 psi with 30° timing. Cast pistons and crank hasn't blown up yet and I've been running the snot out of it.

Just make sure your tune starts with very little timing and alot of fuel. Work up to it. Doing this will try your patients but it's well worth it.
you realise that if something happens and your motor starts knocking bad that at
30 degrees of timing the stock ECU won't be able to pull enough timing quick enough and your motor is gone right?
theres a very good reason alot of people run no more then 24 degrees of timing.
I'm not saying something WILL happen but IF something does then the potential for damage is much higher.

9:2.1 is that dynamic or static? if you have a descent sized cam thats believable because the dynamic will be much lower.

have you scanned your car for knock after tuning it and have you scanned it multible times considering the older ECU's have a very slow logging rate?

in any case you'd make more power if you cut 6 degrees off your timing and ran another pound of boost.
level is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 12:09 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boosted Land
Posts: 5,336
Car: 92 Vert
Engine: 383 LT1 w/ Novi 2000 SC
Transmission: Th400 PTC3500 converter
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9bolt

Classifieds Rating: (28)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

__________________
383 LT1 , Ported heads | Intake Drilled and running MSD Pro Billet Distrib.|Callies racemaster crank & rods | JE Pistons | Novi 2000 supercharger| Alloy Engineering Billet Strut Mounts | SLP Headers| TH400 w/ 10inch PTC 3500 converter | spohon adj. trq arm, cross member ,etc.. | 9bolt with 3.45's

* Gauging interest in selling supercharged 383 /th400 combo for a LSX T56 swap.* PM me if interested. Poss. Trade drive line for LSx t56 drive line*
FSTFBDY is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 12:21 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,941
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

how do you compare a GTP to a gen I small block?

with 8.5:1 CR you should be able to run much more than 13psi aftercooled but then again i am talking about a gen I and you are talking about some "other" engine


gotta love that thread TPI383 read the whole thing and it takes a LONG time
SpitotRs305 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 02:17 AM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago il
Posts: 333
Car: 1987 transam
Engine: 383 /w superram
Transmission: 700r4 /w 2800rpm stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to level
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpitotRs305 View Post
how do you compare a GTP to a gen I small block?

with 8.5:1 CR you should be able to run much more than 13psi aftercooled but then again i am talking about a gen I and you are talking about some "other" engine


gotta love that thread TPI383 read the whole thing and it takes a LONG time
who said I was comparing a gtp to a sbc? and you're right in that you should be able to run alot more then 13psi intercooled but you didn't read my reply properly because the 13psi number was for a non-intercooled roots/twin screw supercharger.
if you want to talk intercooled twinscrew then 26/30psi is "possible" with 9:2.1 compression but you'd need a cam with some serious bleedoff.

lets keep things atleast somewhat in perspective here but let me atleast touch on this for abit.
you say at 8:5.1 I should be able to run alot more then 13lbs? do you have any idea how hot a non-intercooled roots supercharger gets once you start spinning it past its efficiency range? IF my motor was stock I'd be around 20/22lbs but I obviously have enough done that it lowered the dynamic compression thus lowering my boost climax. I'm still limited in the amount of boost I can run because the outlet temps are just to high and I REALLY need and intercooler but I'm cheap

anyways, depending on this guys cam/head choice he MAY be able to run more but I was simply trying to advise him to start with a very low boost number and work from there BUT I didn't see this guy say ANYWHERE that he has anything other then stock heads/cam which WILL limit that amount he can run severely.

Last edited by level; 06-21-2007 at 02:32 AM.
level is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 06:11 AM   #12
86Z
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: CT
Posts: 1,639
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

if it has an intercooler it should be fine. i run a max of 14psi on my 305 with 9.5:1, but i have a 3 core intercooler and methanol injection, right now i'm running 19 degrees of timing, but i plan to up that.
__________________
1986 Camaro 305 TPI Conversion, Accel Base / Runners / AFPR, Holley 52mm TB, FMS 42# Injectors, 7749 with $59 3-bar map, WP 305 S/R Torquer Heads, Crane Powermax 2032 Roller cam, CompCams 1.6 Magnum Roller Rockers, Hedman Coated Headers, Edelbrock Cat-Back, Tremec TKO-600 with CF DF Clutch, Lakewood Scattershield, Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 Posi rear, Spohn LCA's & Relocation brackets, Lakewood adj panhard. 36/24 Swaybars, Spohn Subframe Connectors, Spohn TKO Crossmember with DS Loop, Spohn Steel Driveshaft, Hotchkis Strut Brace, Eibach Pro-Kit, Tokico Illumina Struts and Shocks, Procharger D1SC 12#'s, LS1 Brakes Front, Wilwood Pro Series Rear. 381HP/400FT/LB's on 10#'s of boost

04 Mazda6 S, v6, MTX
94 Jeep Grand Cherokee LTD 5.2

86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 04:59 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ct
Posts: 87
Car: 92rs
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

Keep the tune fat, your IATs low ( intercooler, meth injection) and up that boost. I'm running 8lbs on a cast 9.1:1 motor non-intercooled and have had no problems whatsoever in the last year and a half (driving it like I stole it). Up you timing little by little and listen for knock and when you hear some back it off 2degrees to play it safe. Good luck
whiteghost7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 05:06 PM   #14
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: is 9.25:1 compression too high for a Supercharger

I'm at 14psi with a stock 305, stock cam, and 9.3:1 (I guess, if GM built it per spec). No intercooler. With 35 total advance at WOT, and boost retard at a max of 15... I guess I'm running 20 advance WOT. This is using the Vortech kit with FMU and BTM, and 91 octane pump fuel. I started at 8psi and worked my way up from there, through tuning it. The previous owner of the engine also abused it with the same supercharger, and it has more than 100k miles on it now and the only thing I know is wrong with it is valve stem seals (typical GM). Only on very hot days (90+) have I noticed any knock retard going on.

Now with that said, without knowing what specs your engine was built at... hard to say what PSI you can run. 9.25 may be fine, with an appropriate cam and tune... or with an inappropriate cam and tune, and other engine dynamics it might be way too much. The Vortech kits dont come with any boost control though so you'd either need to install something or swap pullies and keep the RPM down or whatever. Best advice is start small and slowly work your way up, if you're stuck with the motor. Post up the cam and other engine specs, if you have them.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 05:06 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
121, 350, 92, 9251, 951, blower, boost, compression, gen, good, lbs, motor, ratio, sbc, screw, supercharger, superchargers, twin
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details