Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2007, 10:10 PM   #1
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
6-71 or 8-71

I just got ahold of a newly machined 400 small block. I plan on building it for my pro street trans am project. I want a roots style blower, and I also want to make somewhere around 800 horse power. i will be using stoke stroke with a 30 over bore. I already have dart pro 1 heads and I was thinking somewhere around 9-9.5-1 compression, too high? I don't care to use race fuel, not gonna drive it a whole lot anyway. Or maybe is that horsepower figure too high? i want to run a mechanical roller cam, not sure of the size yet. If that horsepower number is too high, what do I need to reach it. Not a big fan of turbo's but worth a thought Thanks
__________________
1987 Trans Am, 355, 215 Pro 1s, 750, Victor Jr, Lunati Cam 525/546 241/249, Turbo 400, 3800 Stall, 4.56
Best 1/8 mile ET: 6.76 Best 1/8 MPH: 101.6
Best 60': 1.49

Last edited by 87draggta; 12-02-2007 at 11:04 PM.
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 12:31 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Hows your current engine in sig working out? Just curious what timeslips you're getting?

I'd shoot for lower compression, boost is more fun than compression. Try for 8:1 or so, then use the 8-71 and you should hit your goal.

I'd look at a short fill on that block, and DEFINATELY use deck plugs. Probably sonic check the block.
I'd recommend o-ringing it too, especially if you want to re-use the nitrous setup.
Going for a new cam or re-using the voodoo?
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 01:37 PM   #3
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Well as far as the engine in my sig, I haven't got to run it yet. In fact I've only had my car for a few months. I got the body and title for pulling the 305 tpi and tranny. I haven't even fired the new one up yet. The 400 is my long term project for after I tub it, if I even do. I only get to work on it like an hour a week, but I'm hoping it runs good. If I like it I am going to reuse the voodoo, but if not then I will probably go solid roller with roller cam bearings and I like the idea of a clean pro street car that will run like stink to.
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 03:05 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twisted Edge Custom Powder Coating Bartonville Ill.
Posts: 1,176
Car: Z28
Engine: S/B
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Here is a B&M 420 in the Z/28, Dyers 6-71 in the truck and a Wieand 8-71 on the stand.

The 8-71 moves 430 CI of air per revolution vs the 6-71 moving 413 CI of air per revolution so as you can see you can spin the 8-71 slower and still get the same boost but with less heat.
The 8-71 on the stand is a +.030 350 has World Sportsman II heads and 8.5:1 comp. we are spinning it at about 9lbs boost and figure the H.P. est. is in the high 600's. It is running 93 octane fuel but is close to the edge in needing higher, if we were to spin it any faster for more H.P. like you are looking for it would definatly need higher octane fuel.



flrtin1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 03:21 PM   #5
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Well the 6-71 is cheaper. I was kinda hopin to make it with it. But the 8-71 isn't that much more. Like I said race fuel isn't that big of a deal. I have also been toying around with the idea of stroking to a 427, or would that make it more unreliable and prone to blowing
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 03:29 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twisted Edge Custom Powder Coating Bartonville Ill.
Posts: 1,176
Car: Z28
Engine: S/B
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

My theory is the KISS method, if you are not trying to get every ounce of power out of it for racing, keep it simple, you will have more power than you can use on the street just going with a basic setup and none of the extra cost/headaches
flrtin1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 03:47 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: princeton,west virginia
Posts: 136
Car: 89 trans am GTA,90 model trans am 350 tuneport,87 firebird
Engine: 355 small block
Transmission: 5 speed,auto 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by flrtin1 View Post
Here is a B&M 420 in the Z/28, Dyers 6-71 in the truck and a Wieand 8-71 on the stand.

The 8-71 moves 430 CI of air per revolution vs the 6-71 moving 413 CI of air per revolution so as you can see you can spin the 8-71 slower and still get the same boost but with less heat.
The 8-71 on the stand is a +.030 350 has World Sportsman II heads and 8.5:1 comp. we are spinning it at about 9lbs boost and figure the H.P. est. is in the high 600's. It is running 93 octane fuel but is close to the edge in needing higher, if we were to spin it any faster for more H.P. like you are looking for it would definatly need higher octane fuel.



Can I come live at your house,WOW,I want all those motors,Very nice!!!!!
__________________
355 small block,dartII heads with 205 valves,200 cc ,lunati cams,545/545-315/315,1.6 roller rockers,flowtech headers,toqurer 2 intake,1 in spacer,800cfm carb,keith black true flat tops,eagle steel crank,eagle steel rods,windgage tray,screened oil returns,balanced, 200 hp top shot nitrous kit 2 stage,100 hp 1st stage,100 hp 2nd stage
gary sanders is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 03:51 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twisted Edge Custom Powder Coating Bartonville Ill.
Posts: 1,176
Car: Z28
Engine: S/B
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary sanders View Post
Can I come live at your house,WOW,I want all those motors,Very nice!!!!!
Lol, the Z/28 is mine the truck and one on the stand are engines I built for a couple of friends
flrtin1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 04:11 PM   #9
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Yeah no joke, it has took me like 3 years and 3 different cars to get my engine where it is now. i hope to start on the other one next spring. That is one sharp setup you got there, any of them.
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 09:54 PM   #10
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

What is a manageable boost level for with ore, I was thinkin like 10 lbs or so, maybe less. I found link for a 400 small block with a 6-71 build up. http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...wer/index.html
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 10:19 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twisted Edge Custom Powder Coating Bartonville Ill.
Posts: 1,176
Car: Z28
Engine: S/B
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Any level of boost is manageable (to a point) with what level of octane you are willing to constantly run......it all begins with your static compression the closer to 7.0:1 to 7.5:1 you can get the easier it is to deal with detonation at higher levels of boost, going with aluminum heads will help also. The down side is the lower compression pistons are sometimes hard to find and usually get pretty pricey
flrtin1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:28 AM   #12
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

I'll probably be running 110 octane fuel, I was wanting around 10 lbs of boost, and probably like 8.5-9-1 compression. I already have aluminum heads. I would be happy, I mean estatic with like 700-750. That shouldn't be too hard to do. I actually wanted a procharger, but the more I look the more I like a big 8-71 blower sticken up, and I don't care which one is more efficient it still makes power
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 11:43 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
flrtin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twisted Edge Custom Powder Coating Bartonville Ill.
Posts: 1,176
Car: Z28
Engine: S/B
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87draggta View Post
I don't care which one is more efficient it still makes power
While the roots have a lower efficiency than the centrifical as far as making power it's like apples and oranges....if you get a chance to ride in a roots car then a centrifical car the difference in the torque graph will be crystal clear of course the downside is the acreage that is sticking out of the hood
flrtin1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 10:19 PM   #14
Member
 
87draggta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6-71 or 8-71

that is my favorite part. Yeah I have rode in a 6-71 car, my buddy had a 69 camaro with a real strong 454 in it. He took it out of the 69 and put it in a 57 that was tubbed and still couldn't hook. IT was scary. I have another friend with a built 400 small block in a 79. He pulled the wheels and grenaded the 4 speed about a week ago. I kinda like his set up to, a big solid roller with ported dart pro 1'a 13-1 tunnel ram and a 3.73 but I love a blower
87draggta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 10:19 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
355, 3rd, 400, 454, 671, 871, block, blower, camaro, fuel, gen, high, octane, small, stand
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details