Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-02-2009, 10:30 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

What would be a better platform for the standing mile: 91 up firebird or camaro?

I know a "stock" body firebird reached 300mph, but could a camaro with adequate power reach around 250mph safely with neccessary aero mods?
wilson34 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 11:08 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
ellocojorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 600
Car: 1991 camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: stock

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

this is just opinion, but i would think head light covers would be good, i think that are might act like mini parachutes and raise the front end or pop the hood
ellocojorge is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 11:50 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 115

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

i would go with the bird
mexicanknight is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 08:44 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Zdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 76
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 currently
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt Moser/Richmond 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

I run a standing mile car and the numbers you are talking are "salt flat" numbers. I don't run covers over my head lights. Both car have their pros and cons on aerodynamics and terminal velocity. Most F-body vehicles with power adders or big block conversions will run 195-225mph in the standing mile.

Good luck with your build!


Last edited by Zdaddy; 11-06-2009 at 08:47 AM.
Zdaddy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:33 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

Thanks zdaddy, I know they were salt flat numbers I was just trying to find out if the camaro could be a high speed platform because I can't get over the looks of the bird. I have a corvette right now and figure it would be way cheaper to run the mile in a third gen.

Where did you get your front lip also and how much work did it take to get it to fit up perfect?
Also, my setup will most likely end up being a lsx block with twin tc70s turbos running a tr6060 tranny. This is just a paper build as of now and won't be started until funds fall into place.
wilson34 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:45 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 119

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

Zdaddy - That car looks freakin sick...I love it!!!

Cam
killa66cam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:32 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Zdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 76
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 currently
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt Moser/Richmond 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilson34 View Post
Thanks zdaddy, I know they were salt flat numbers I was just trying to find out if the camaro could be a high speed platform because I can't get over the looks of the bird. I have a corvette right now and figure it would be way cheaper to run the mile in a third gen.

Where did you get your front lip also and how much work did it take to get it to fit up perfect?
Also, my setup will most likely end up being a lsx block with twin tc70s turbos running a tr6060 tranny. This is just a paper build as of now and won't be started until funds fall into place.
Custom fabbed in my shop. It's not that hard to make...just time consuming with a lots of fit checks. It was very needed when I felt the front begin to lift over 175mph. Top speed so far, 208 mph, hoping for another 10-15 mph in the spring. It takes 100+ RWHP for another 10 mph over 200 mph. Terminal Velocity is a bitch! When you start the build feel free to contact me for any build help.
Zdaddy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 07:14 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 1,118
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to paul_huryk
Re: Standing Mile Platform Suggestion

It's going to be a test of power, aerodynamics, weight, and transmission gearing to get an optimal full mile run.

The power is the easy one, although a forced induction car with an air to air intercooler is going to create a lot of cooling drag.

Aerodynamics are the key - you need to allow the car to cut through the air with as little resistance as possible without creating left. Zdaddy did a great job of controlling airflow under his car with the lower front spoiler and splitter, but (from what I can see from the pic) did not cover up the tires, which by body design stick into the airflow past the car and create major drag.

You really want a Camaro for one reason, you can use the nose air intakes for cooling, something that the Firebird doesn't have to eliminate the air dam under the car (a huge drag creator).

The car that ran 300mph had about 1,400hp or so and was massaged - so it wasn't stock.

Hot rod had an article in 1989 of a Trans Am that had a massaged body and a 650hp detuned NASCAR motor - ran 240mph, the same as the McLaren F1, which is a much smaller car with about 1,200lbs less to move around...
__________________
Come Visit the Thirdgen Blog! http://thirdgenfbody.wordpress.com/
paul_huryk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 07:14 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
3rd, 76, body, build, camaro, camero, gen, iroc, mile, nascar, nitrous, platform, rs, standing, stock, transmission
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details