Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Power Adder Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2002, 07:55 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 83

Classifieds Rating: (0)
building a small block for boost

Hi,

I was wondering if you used a 350 4 bolt block and used a forged crank with the same stroke as the cranks in the chevy 302 and longer rods and a reversed dome piston and a 72 or 76 cc chamber head also intercooled. With the shorter stroke and long rod combination couldnt you run a whole lot of boost with out running into detonation problems? Ive read articles about this being true with a naturally aspirated 400 block with a crank from a 327 and 6.2 rods makeing over a 12 compression ratio.
jijiandfarmgang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2002, 10:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Changing Tires
Posts: 5,676
Car: too many ...

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well its kind of a tradeoff ... you either have high compression and a low boost or you have low compression and alot of boost. If you had a 12;1 compression ratio and tried to run 15 psi I'm sure the engine would explode. Guys with the LS1 (around 11:1 compression I think? not sure) run 6-9 psi at the max .... and still make 500+ hp! So if you wanted high compression like 12:1, I wouldnt recommend anything higher than 6 psi (and it will still eventually blow up .. you can just prolong it). Some of the guys on the boards are leaving their compression ratio around 9:1 and running around 15 psi. That seems to be a solid configuration. The compression ratio on the engine in my SVO is 8:1 and they can take 17 psi no problem (I plan to push 25 psi with a reworked shortblock). It just depends on how you want to do it. For me I would rather leave my compression low and let the boost dictate how much power I want to make. Other people like to have the high compression and run a max of like 9 psi .... both ways work just depends on what you like. Another advantage of the low compression ratio's is you can run 87 octage gas!! woohoo!! hahahah.
__________________
CrazyHawaiian is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2002, 11:44 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
=)

I have been thinking about this alot. How to get teh most out of alot of boost. I have been doing alot of thinking on how to get low compression. The only thing I know that really works is the reverse dome pistons.

If anyone cna offer some guidence it would be greatly appreciated.

thanks:hail: :hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 11:49 AM   #4
RMK
Moderator
 
RMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,255
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: modded LB9
Transmission: Pro Built 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: =)

Quote:
Originally posted by Trux
I have been thinking about this alot. How to get teh most out of alot of boost. I have been doing alot of thinking on how to get low compression. The only thing I know that really works is the reverse dome pistons.

Dish pistons and larger chambers in the heads will both lower compression.
RMK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 05:09 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
=D

What about the bore of the block. How does that affect the compression?

thanks:hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 07:14 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 276
Car: Old Car - 1982 Vette. New Car - 1972 Vette Convertible
Engine: Old Car - 1200hp TTSBC 427. New Car - TT LS7X
Transmission: Old Car - 4L80E. New Car - TBD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Increasing the diameter of the bore, increases the static compression ratio, all else being equal.
__________________
Old Car
1982 Corvette
1200 hp/1000ft lb (pump gas)Twin Turbo SBC 427
4L80E/TCI T-COM

New Car
1972 Corvette Convertible
Twin Turbo LS7X in progress (1400+hp on pump gas goal)
Monty is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 07:55 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
oh,

thanks:hail: :hail: :hail:

How does the crank shaft size affect the compression?

like if I had a 400 crank in it (383 ci). How will that affect compression?


Thanks :hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 08:10 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 276
Car: Old Car - 1982 Vette. New Car - 1972 Vette Convertible
Engine: Old Car - 1200hp TTSBC 427. New Car - TT LS7X
Transmission: Old Car - 4L80E. New Car - TBD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Inreasing the stroke would increase compression, but it is usually not something that you would or could do. Without changing the length of the connecting rod and/or using pistons with the appropriate compression height, and/or changing the cylinder block's deck height, you would end up with piston to head contact. Normally, when you increase the stroke and/or upgrade to a longer rod, you will need pistons which have a shorter compression height.
__________________
Old Car
1982 Corvette
1200 hp/1000ft lb (pump gas)Twin Turbo SBC 427
4L80E/TCI T-COM

New Car
1972 Corvette Convertible
Twin Turbo LS7X in progress (1400+hp on pump gas goal)
Monty is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2002, 11:26 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
oh

Umm... so...umm...
Not sure how to ask it.

Ummm.... basically since you need lower compression pistons and shorter rods to make a stoker, it does not effect the compression that much?

thanks :hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2002, 04:08 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 83

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Hi again,

Crazy Hawaian,

What I meant was to use larger chamber heads like 72cc and 76cc and dished pistons so I would have a lower compression ratio prefferably less than 9.1 if possible wouldnt the longer rods be better?
jijiandfarmgang is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2002, 05:34 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Anderson, IN
Posts: 414
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Greasemonkey
Quote:
Ummm.... basically since you need lower compression pistons and shorter rods to make a stoker, it does not effect the compression that much?
It depends on what pistons you get. If you get the correct pistons for the chamber size the comp ratio will be around the same as what it was before you stroked it.
Quote:
What I meant was to use larger chamber heads like 72cc and 76cc and dished pistons so I would have a lower compression ratio prefferably less than 9.1 if possible wouldnt the longer rods be better?
The longer rods with everything else designed correctly would probably allow you to run a little more boost.
Greasemonkey is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2002, 11:55 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
ok

thanks for your help:hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 12:09 PM   #13
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,381
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: None / LS3
Transmission: None / 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
A stock 350 is 9.3:1 CR with 64cc heads. If i kept that CR and went with forged pistons (stock crank and rods) how much boost would I be able to safely run? I was thinking around 8 PSI (intercooled), does that sound right?
Omega is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 04:57 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 66
Car: camaro
Engine: 8-71 blown 355
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 9inch 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
if you are changing the pistons to a forged set why don't you get a dished blower piston. I am running a 22cc dish piston from J&E for my 355, it's a off the shelf piston, nothing custom.
Also, rod length has nothing to do with compression ratio. Just bore,stroke,head gasket thickness,piston dome + or -,how far the piston is below the deck at TDC affect compression ratio. Less compression and more boost is usually better than high compression ratio and less boost. don't go too low on the compression or you loose a little on the bottem before the boost comes in, usually. I'd probably shoot for 8:1 to 8:5:1 and 8-10lbs.
blown 83 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 04:59 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 66
Car: camaro
Engine: 8-71 blown 355
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 9inch 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
crap, i forgot the obvious, duh, volume of the head combustion chamber has a play at compression ratio. just didn't want someone saying I forgot somthing
blown 83 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 05:05 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, Maine USA
Posts: 591
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Trux Send a message via Yahoo to Trux
Question

does the loctaion of the piston rings change teh compression much?
I know you can have them custom made closer to the top or further down.

thanks:hail: :hail: :hail:
Trux is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 05:15 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Anderson, IN
Posts: 414
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Greasemonkey
Quote:
Also, rod length has nothing to do with compression ratio.
We know that. I'm not really sure of this, but I've always understood a longer rod (to a point) is better. I think it has something to do with the time near TDC, and the longer rod allows slightly more compression without detonation or more boost. One case of this I've seen people mention is a 400 destroked to a 350 w/ 6in rods that had over 11:1 compression and still ran on 87 octane.
Greasemonkey is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2002, 07:04 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 66
Car: camaro
Engine: 8-71 blown 355
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 9inch 4.30:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'm not real sure how long rods help in a blown engine. I am always hearing conflicting arguments about long vs. stock length rods. Some say helps in keeping it at TDC longer and helps against piston side loading. I have never had a long rod engine though so I am not real sure.
I do know though that when I bought my rotating assymbly I had heck of a time finding pistons for 6in rods with a reverse dome for a small block. I could get them custom, but I would have payed about double what a off the shelf piston would have been. I did look into it but it just seemed like for the price it just wasn't worth it. I finally went with a Eagle 4340 forged crank with a extra 1/4in keyway, Eagle 4340 5.7in H-beam rods, and J&E reverse dome fly cut blower pistons, and had it all balanced. To me it seemed strong enough for just about anything I would do. by the way I am running a Weiand 8-71
blown 83 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2002, 10:55 PM   #19
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,877
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
Re: building a small block for boost

Quote:
Originally posted by jijiandfarmgang
Hi,

I was wondering if you used a 350 4 bolt block and used a forged crank with the same stroke as the cranks in the chevy 302 and longer rods and a reversed dome piston and a 72 or 76 cc chamber head also intercooled. With the shorter stroke and long rod combination couldnt you run a whole lot of boost with out running into detonation problems? Ive read articles about this being true with a naturally aspirated 400 block with a crank from a 327 and 6.2 rods makeing over a 12 compression ratio.
I have calculated and re-calculated and the 4.030" bore X 3.00" stroke (302 chevy) motor with a dished piston lets assume around 19-21cc dish and a 72-76cc head will net you around like 6:1 or less compression. even a maximum style .430" dome piston would only give you about 9.9 to 10.5 with those heads and that bore and stroke.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mvc-015e1.jpg (8.1 KB, 152 views)

Last edited by B4Ctom1; 04-15-2002 at 10:59 PM.
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2002, 12:43 AM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Abilene/Lubbock, TX
Posts: 389

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to RyanSS
What is the best piston manufacturer out there? I have heard that TRW is good and that Speed pro is good, but what is the best, i mean something that will hold up beyond expectation.
RyanSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2002, 12:43 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Power Adder

Tags
21cc, 427, 64cc, bust, compression, cr, dome, equal, head, lock, piston, pistons, reverse, sbc, small
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details