Southern California AreaSouthern California Members.
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
Foreign objects on freeways
Years ago a pickup driver lost his spare tire. The last vehicle to hit it was a semi that flipped it over the guard rail of the 55 onto katella ave. A total of 5 cars were damaged by this tire. My brothers 442 took it nose first and sheered off the oil pan and bent the bumper.
So this TOOL, kkings whatever, is saying 6 drivers are in the wrong because they hit a foreign object on the road. DUH.
BTW the dummy that dropped the tire drives up to this scene in a VW and asks if anyone has seen a spare tire. The CHP on scene had a long meeting with this dummy and his ins co was not happy.
What is his opinion of the thousands of drivers, many long haul truckers, that hit deer and cattle on the road at night.
LOL! Were you shaking when you typed this? I’m 5’ 7” 330 and I’d be happy to “meet” you anytime sunshine.
Quote:
And it's quite obvious you're angry, otherwise you wouldn't be resulting to the usage of swear words.
Case in point! Again, you don’t know me or the way I communicate. Anyone that knows me, know that I swear a lot. So, for you to “ASSume” that just because I’m swearing I’m angry. Well that dovetails very nicely into my weak as puppy piss theory. You my friend are filled with teen angst and need precious release! Now it’s into the shower, up on the balls of your feet, balance yourself with shower head, and oh… oh…
Quote:
Tool? The babylon english dictionary defines tool as:
Tool (insult)
The word "tool" may be used as an insult, describing someone who is being used by an establishment willingly (as a sycophant), or unwillingly (as one who blindly conforms).
Now please explain which establishment am I willingly, or blindly being used by? Which establishment am I spewing my rhetoric forth on behalf of?
This falls into the whole “slang” thing. You see, people like you would be completely lost without text book definitions to live by. Which is why you have to have a text book answer for everything? My definition of tool is a dumbass no more, no less. It is more probable than not that you will not find that in a dictionary but I suppose you could always look under idiot.
Quote:
I honestly can't be the only one on here the feels the same as me, but I'm the only one that will tell you so and because of that you've come down with surprisingly ferocious rebuttal, admist that a string of immature and uncalled for insults that are not only false but are also an example of stereotyping.
Well it kind of looks like you are the only one that feels the way you do and you are entitled to your opinion no matter how worthless it may be. I’m sorry if you feel my communication with you is ferocious or immature but I’m not used to dealing with someone as delicate as you are. Maybe I’ll just give you a time out and take away your D&D costumes?
Quote:
Why is it so difficult to have an argument without getting so heated? Why can you not just maintain your calm and leave the insults at home? There is no need to get so heated.
Dude, you are like a kitten chasing a piece of dangling string. You will work your *** off trying to get something that you never will. Trust me… you would know if I was pissed. Your attempts to engage me are extremely entertaining. It’s like watching a dog chase his tail!
Hopefully you picked up the exhaust so you could salvage the cat to help pay for the repairs and then take the rest of his fart can exhaust out and use it for target practice.
yea great idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey Goose
Allow me to retort my little 19 year old prodigy…
First and foremost, attempting to argue the particulars of a series of events that you did not experience/witness first hand is not only laughable, it’s pathetic. Furthermore, to say that you are “referring to all of this in a matter of probability and chance” and then to immediately contradict yourself by saying that “I am quite sure of the sequence of events that occurred”. You are living and breathing proof that once again our public school system has and is continuing to fail the youth of this great nation of ours… You are the genuine article! You are the epitome of an idiot!
Ok sweetheart, grab your crayons and construction paper. Now try and keep up, I’m going to take you down a road of fact and actuality because I and the majority of human beings on this planet have never had the privilege of living life through “probability and chance”.
Fact: You were not there.
Fact: You do not know me and I do not know you so how could you possibly elaborate on the particulars let alone the very definition/proposed meaning of my vernacular. I guarantee you and I do not use the same “slang”. So your really bitchin attempt at deciphering my urban slang has only proven my point and that is your intellect is as weak as puppy piss.
Fact: Monday-Friday traffic on the northbound 5 freeway between Harbor and Euclid in Orange County consistently flows 35-40mph between 10-11AM with the exception of an occasional accident which would bring the freeway to a complete haut. This can be verified by any of the members that live in Orange County.
Fact: Vehicles traveling at 30-40mph travel in a much closer proximity than vehicles traveling at the maximum posted speed limit which in this case is 65mph. “if he was going at a slower, safer speed he could have either swerved or braked to avoid the exhaust system.” Pouring on negative acceleration in this particular situation would have placed the vehicle behind me in my trunk given the close proximity. But how could you know that? You weren’t there! Oh, and “swerving” at 35-40mph is called trading paint with the vehicle in the lane next to you. So once again your intellect and life experience has net you some additional idiot points!
Fact: I am a surgeon with my car at any speed and have been forced to negotiate circumstances far more difficult than this one. So for you to not only attempt to critique my actions, but make suggestions on how I could have avoided it is comical!
I don’t know who you think you are, or what you think you know but I do know this. In the 8 years that I have been on this board, you are without a doubt the most ignorant mother****er I have ever had the displeasure of experiencing. You don’t know me, so don’t attempt to advise me. I’m sure there are things you have expertise in like chronic masturbation, collecting stickers for your helmet, and licking the windows while riding on the short buss.
Now comes the friendly advice! Do not respond to this post because if you do I will destroy you. Believe me when I say that you are no match for me. Learn from your mistake and govern yourself accordingly.
is the fixin to get busted out
give him heck, i cant stand when people braf out fragments of crap on here in the form of words, put together to try to make some sence
You guys are being ridiculous. You act as if I'm cussing this guy out. It's simple, if GG had not been trying to pass he would have had more time to react to the exhaust laying in his lane. Which in turn would have given him more time to find an escape route.
How can you argue against that? You guys are so stubborn.
And to you injin or whatever your name is. No I'm not saying all those drivers that hit the wheel were at fault, because we don't know enough about the situation to make such an assumption, but we do know enough in this current situation, we know he was speeding up to pass which in turn gave him less time to react to the situation.
When 4 or 5 people tell you that your opinion is stupid most people, with intelligence, shut the fk up.
When you mature Butterfly, you should reread this dribble you insist is fact and if nature takes its normal course you will then realize how immature you are today.
How am I being immature? I'm arguing my point and belief. How is that immature? What about you guys that resort to immature insults and comebacks? Is that mature? I think you need to take a step back and reread the post.
You guys are being ridiculous. You act as if I'm cussing this guy out. It's simple, if GG had not been trying to pass he would have had more time to react to the exhaust laying in his lane. Which in turn would have given him more time to find an escape route.
How can you argue against that? You guys are so stubborn.
And to you injin or whatever your name is. No I'm not saying all those drivers that hit the wheel were at fault, because we don't know enough about the situation to make such an assumption, but we do know enough in this current situation, we know he was speeding up to pass which in turn gave him less time to react to the situation.
The one that's being ridiculous is the one you see when you look in the mirror. You are stuck on the fact that he was accelerating and by damn that's the way it should be based on 3 yrs of driving experience. What you are failing to grasp is the bigger picture.
Once again let me lay it out for you:
1. Yes he was accelerating, I'll give you that.
2. The reason he was accelerating was to give himself an escape route since he was boxed in by the van and the semi and an idiot was making erratic moves ahead of him.
3. Having one or more escape routes is recommended by any cop, insurance agent, driving instructor...whatever. At this point he had none.
4. At the point where GG was accelerating to get a safer vehicle position by mere coincidence alone the exhaust let loose.
Had GG not been accelerating and therefore been going slower (like you have so passionatly been preaching) there were no guarantees that he would have had an opportunity to gain any escape routes and possibly avoid hitting the exhaust all together. More than likely he would have had to hit his brakes and probably would have been rear ended in the process. Based on my 19 years of driving experience (coincedently the number of years you've been alive) with a good number of it in freeway traffic I would have to say what GG did was the correct maneuver, in that he sped up (he probably had the room because he was laying back) to get out of a boxed in situation and away from an idiot all the while gaining escape routes. It was just bad luck that the exhaust came off when it did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkingsrulee
if GG had not been trying to pass he would have had more time to react to the exhaust laying in his lane. Which in turn would have given him more time to find an escape route.
How can you argue against that? You guys are so stubborn.
Again my arguement is that he was already making maneuvers to get escape routes when the exhaust just happened to come off. I don't know how you can argue that he should have stayed boxed in and just gone slower and hoped for the best. That isn't even called defensive driving, that's just hope for the best driving.
for all you know the fact that he was going faster could of saved him, lets say he didnt do anything when rice boy farted on him, rice boys fart can and fart pipe fly off, and slide over to that 18 wheeler, 18 wheeler runs over fart pipe, fart pipe takes off like a rocket, goes through this guys windshield and kills him
ok another case same situations he ignores rice boy, has time to stop, get out, deposit cat and fart pipe in car, takes off again, goes to the scrap yard sells cat for some good green backs gets 2 cents for the rest of the fart pipe, now he wants to take his old lady out with the cash from the cat, so he goes home and gets her, on the way to dinner some soccer mom in a suv slams on brakes because there is a cup laying in the road (we all know how SUV' panic over nothing) 18 wheeler behind her slams on brakes jack knifes, our boy hits the 18 wheeler as a school bus full of sunday school childern comes over the hill sees the firey crash slams on brakes, spins out bust through the gaurd rail, rolls 30 times down the mountian, into a propane plant and blows up 3 city blocks
what im getting at is you nor me, nor anyone else on here knows what would of happened if he never got on it, only the man upstairs knows that, and your not him, so PLEASE leave it as it is
Tell me why in the hell would you try and pass someone that's "Weaving in and out of traffic" (obviously going faster than you) and trying to get your attention to race?
Would that not look like an acceptance of his challenge? Anyone with some common sense can see that it looks like he is accepting his challenge if you try and pass a guy that wants to race you.
The best course of action in this situation would be to keep going with the flow of traffic and LET THE GUY GO like I originally pointed out.
And you guys are acting as if the ***** was staying stationary in front of GG inhibiting his movement. No he was going faster than him as GG first said "weaving in and out of traffic", a series of maneuvers that can only be accomplished by going FASTER than the flow of traffic.
Since the ***** was going faster than GG the best decision would be to just maintain your speed and let him go like I first said.
is the 
fixin to get busted out
