Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2002, 07:46 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,619
Car: 2006 C6 Z06 (Black)
Engine: LS7
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
which prop. valve do I need?

if I have 1LE style brakes in the front and 89+ PBR brakes in the rear on a 1985 Z28? I noticed in the sticky 1LE thread that the two proportioning valves listed are broken down for 82-88 and 89+. It is not clear if this is because of the difference in the rear brakes (older style rears vs. PBR 1LE rears) or maybe because of routing or brake line changes.


thanks.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
"Everytime I walk by the Raider sticker it zaps my energy and I have to hurl." - Don L.
james_85Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-14-2002, 11:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mystikkal_69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,823
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 (350 TPI)
Transmission: MD8 (700 R4) + 3.42 LS1 Rear

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to mystikkal_69
according to andyz28 the 1LE combo valve.....

1st design 14089496 89.5' and older

if your existing line comes right out of the front of the valve, you will need to modify the existing hard line to make it work.
mystikkal_69 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2002, 10:23 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,619
Car: 2006 C6 Z06 (Black)
Engine: LS7
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
but he doesn't sate if the reason is because of plumbing differences or because of the diference in rear brake designs that are totally different. That's what I'm wondering. Yes I have an 85, but I have a 92 rear with 12" PBR brakes.
james_85Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2002, 12:28 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Dyno Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 3,771
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.63@108.69
Engine: 355 w/E-Tec 200's
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Dyno Don
Prop valve

It is not clear if this is because of the difference in the rear brakes (older style rears vs. PBR 1LE rears) or maybe because of routing or brake line changes.

It's brake design difference. Get the late style '89-'92.

Don>>>
Dyno Don is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2002, 12:56 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,619
Car: 2006 C6 Z06 (Black)
Engine: LS7
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (0)
thanks.
james_85Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2002, 07:34 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,493

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You will need the Proportioning Valve for the PBR rears a 89 to 92.
Z28DJP1987 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2002, 08:06 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
ebmiller88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,366
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the agenda
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to ebmiller88
I disagree fellas. The differences in the prop valves are based on the thread pitch of the tubing threads, not on year model brakes. James should use P/N 14089496.

The following quote is from Daniel Burke's site and (hopefully) should clear this up.

1LE Combo Valve (proportioning valve)

14089496 1989 1st design: M1.0 tube nut threads (For 1982 - early 1989 applications)

10136840 1989 2nd design: M1.5 tube nut threads (Late 1989)
10136840 1990-'92: M1.5 tube nut threads.

Measure your existing brake line tube nut threads before ordering. The Master cylinder tubes have one that is M1.5 and one that is M1.0 so don't worry about them. Worry about your existing brake lines to the calipers and rear axle.

I used the 14089496 1st design because my car was built in 1984.

Mine required some relocating of the rear disk brake line: My old combo valve had the line coming in the front, whereas the 1LE piece had it coming in from the bottom of the valve. My existing line bent with no problems. Be prepared to replace that line if it's at all corroded. It might crack.

Here's his site's link:
http://www.ws6transam.org/1LEbrake.html

It's some good reading.

Hope this helps. FWIW, I also ordered P/N 14089496 for my 1988 Iroc. I will be installing it this week.

Ed
ebmiller88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
14089496, brake, hard, line, prop, proportioning, t56, valve
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.