Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2003, 12:59 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
ceramic vs metallic pads, which is better?

Just as the title states, for a street/strip car which would be better and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages between the 2? I will be using stock rotors, calipers, and aluminum drums if it matters.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 04:12 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gainsville GA
Posts: 1,313
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Aviator857
well the ceramic do not create black dust that builds up on the wheels. This is the main plus and selling point for ceramic pads. However I haven't ran them, ceramic in general as a material will disipate heat very quickly, they use ceramic tiles as heat shilds on the shuttle. They also use ceramic rotors in some race classes. But I would say the performance would be about the same as carbon/metallic based pads when running stock rotors but without the dust. The only problem I can see with them is ceramic can fracture with vibration, but then so do metallic pads. But they are made to keep your wheels looking new. The getting slotted/cross drilled rotors would be a better solution for street use to help stopping power. I wouldn't use them on the rear drums since the drum traps most of the dust. I haven't seen a stoping distance comparance, has anyone?
__________________
A few pics and Info about My Car.


1989 Formula Firebird
For more See my cardomain Site.
Aviator857 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 05:10 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 118
Car: "My American Dream"
Engine: V8
Transmission: auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I don't know does this answer to question about ceramic brake pads but i give you what i have read:
In one Finnish magazine they tested trans am GTA with kevlar brake pads and found that stopping force had increased so much that it was even hard to brake with out locking wheels. Tests were performed on normal streets so thats maybe the reason why they locked wheels (streets- dust and dirt on the surface (small amounts, you don't see it but you know it's there) - no optium grip). The car they used had 4 wheel disks and they measured increased braking force with g-tech or similar equipment.
So yes, kevlar pads increase braking force. tested brake pads were EBC "green stuff" pads and soon as i get rear disks i will invest to these parts´!
Jukka is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 11:00 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 1,878
Car: 2000 astro, 1984 camaro z28
Engine: 4.3, 305
Transmission: A4, A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5's with 3.42 and 3.23 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to robertg Send a message via AIM to robertg Send a message via Yahoo to robertg
as far as i know, they don't make a ceramic brake shoe.

but indeed, the ceramic brake pads reduce brake dust significantly. i'm curious to try a set of our ceramix (i work at napa) brake pads when i do a c4 front brake swap on my coupe.
robertg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 11:15 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,370
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to D Stroy H8
They will help stopping distance, but only marginally without the right compliments (oversized/slotted rotor, upgraded calipers etc)
D Stroy H8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 05:55 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phillips Ranch
Posts: 18
Car: Camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: stick

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Carbon/Ceramic brake pads are the way to go for a vehicle of this weight and mild to heavy street use. They are low dust (like everyone has stated) and are easy on the rotors (they bed easily) and do not require warmup time like Carbon/Kevlar (semi race, and harder on rotors) and Carbon/Carbon pads do full race (need to be properly bedded and run at high heat temp constantly to work properly)

Metalic pads are basic everyday budget brake pads that wear long, but groove rotors over time.
CanAmCam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2003, 08:31 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
so you guys are saying ceramic is actually better that metallic? Besides the dust issue which sounds nice, which would stop better with everything else being equal?
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 08:13 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 1,878
Car: 2000 astro, 1984 camaro z28
Engine: 4.3, 305
Transmission: A4, A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5's with 3.42 and 3.23 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to robertg Send a message via AIM to robertg Send a message via Yahoo to robertg
for what its worth... one of my shops uses nothing but the ceramix pads for his customers....

my final word on them won't come until i actually use a set when i do the c4 brake kit.
robertg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 11:53 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,741

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Wow, thanks for the info guys. I dunno why, but I had always thought metallic was the better for performance, but I learn something new every day. Looks like the ceramic is a pretty viable option for me now.

I was looking at these. What do you guys think?

http://www.bendixbrakes.com/sell/ct3.pdf

Last edited by 25THRSS; 11-25-2003 at 11:55 PM.
25THRSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2003, 07:49 PM   #10
Moderator
 
OUTATIME GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 4,997
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ProCharged TPI 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27/9-bolt

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to OUTATIME GTA
I was going to get a set of these bosch ceramic fronts:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=2444304344

says 1989-1992 FIREBIRD ALL W/ 2 PISTON CALIPER W REAR DISC.

i've got all discs, not sure about the "2 piston caliper", these should work, right?
__________________
'89 Trans Am GTA (L98) | '88 Firebird (Z20 Package)

| Homepage link to my GTA |
OUTATIME GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2003, 12:43 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
I plan on picking up a set of raybestos ceramic pads next time I need new brake pads. I put the 1le brakes on the front and have the pbr discs in the rear. I spent tons of time refinishing my aluminum rims to make them all nice and pretty. I plan on trying the ceramic pads without even worrying about the performance difference. I'm running stock pads right now, and I have to constantly clean my front rims due to the continuous buildup of the damn brake dust! I think this problem alone makes it worth purchasing ceramic pads if you have a nice set of wheels that you'd like to keep looking nice!
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2003, 12:43 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
2000, advantages, brake, brakes, camaro, carbon, ceramic, disadvantages, kevlar, metalic, metallic, pads, rotors, semi, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details