Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2004, 12:00 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nr London, England
Posts: 147

Classifieds Rating: (0)
IROC vs GTA... silly question time

I was just wondering if, apart from the softer spring rates for the GTA, there was any difference between the front springs for both cars...

seeing as I have got headers and alloy heads would having a set of GTA rather than IROC springs suit me better as a lowering option for my Z28?

further into the future I might lower the car further (company here offers a lowering service by means of a molten lead bath - they are spring manufactures and so not a bunch of muppets) for which I would probably use the same springs as I now have (namely GTA ones)... any comments
irocfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 09:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stouffville, Ontario
Posts: 1,708
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Eibach
George is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 09:09 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
ZZ42Fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rugby, England
Posts: 1,328
Car: 1988 IROC Vert
Engine: 305 Tpi
Transmission: T5 Manual

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Hi Patrick,

In a word, I don't think it would make any difference whatsoever. If I remember correctly your car is sitting high at the front- how about cutting half a coil? Mine has Alloy heads too and sits fine (not sure what difference headers would make?)

Regards,
Felix
ZZ42Fast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 09:22 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,562
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Dewey316 Send a message via AIM to Dewey316 Send a message via MSN to Dewey316 Send a message via Yahoo to Dewey316
to keep your spring rates matched front/rear. and get the height you desire, you are probably best off going with the ws6 springs, and trimming them a bit to get your desired height. the problem you get into with swaping springs rates, is your car may take on handling charactoristics you do not want.
Dewey316 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 06:34 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nr London, England
Posts: 147

Classifieds Rating: (0)
yeap ZZ42... you are correct... my front bits are sort of waving in the air so to speak... I've managed to lay my hands on some GTA springs (2nd hand) for £20 and so figured it was worth a punt... happy to spend another £40ish to get them heated (via the afore mentioned molten lead bath) and lowered a little more... just seem to recall that the GTA had similar rave reviews on the handling front to the IROC and being as I have a lighter front than standard (aparently headers save a little weight too) a little softer may not be an altogether bad idea

as for handling at the moment it isn't the most stable car I've ever driven, can get downright "interesting" figure almost anything has to be better than that (front-end lift at 90+ isn't the most comfortable feeling!!!)

will let you all know how it goes... not for a few months yet though probably - will be having a friend do the wor while I watch and assist
irocfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 11:09 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
ZZ42Fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rugby, England
Posts: 1,328
Car: 1988 IROC Vert
Engine: 305 Tpi
Transmission: T5 Manual

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Good luck. Can't be bad for a score (£20)

See you at the Spring Nats perhaps.

Just a note, the IROC feels solid at speeds of 110-120 no worries, it will be down to your springs I'd imagine.

Cheers,
felix
ZZ42Fast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 02:18 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nr London, England
Posts: 147

Classifieds Rating: (0)
certainly plan to be at the spring & summer nats in the 'maro too!
irocfan is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 02:18 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
1988, gta, iroc, irocz, springs, suspension, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details